Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1021 - 1040 of 1042
VISIT TO QATAR : REPORT OF THE INDEPENDENT EXPERT ON HUMAN RIGHTS AND INTERNATIONAL SOLIDARITY
VISIT TO QATAR : REPORT OF THE INDEPENDENT EXPERT ON HUMAN RIGHTS AND INTERNATIONAL SOLIDARITY A/HRC/44/44/ADD.1 NULL 2020 05 27T00:00:00 IE International solidarity United Nations A/HRC/44/44/Add.1 General Assembly Distr.: General 27 May 2020 Original: UHRIA/HRC/44/44/ADD.1https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/4b7af3a4-2d20-49b3-a002-883bdd8de79e
VISIT TO TO MONGOLIA - REPORT OF THE SPECIAL RAPPORTEUR ON THE SITUATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS DEFENDERS
VISIT TO TO MONGOLIA REPORT OF THE SPECIAL RAPPORTEUR ON THE SITUATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS DEFENDERS A/HRC/43/51/ADD.2 NULL 2019 12 26T00:00:00 SR HR Defenders United Nations A/HRC/43/51/Add.2 General Assembly Distr.: General 26 December 2019 Original: UHRIA/HRC/43/51/ADD.2https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/0ac7c77e-30e1-43cf-9557-1c71ec086964
VISIT TO UZBEKISTAN - REPORT OF THE SPECIAL RAPPORTEUR ON THE INDEPENDENCE OF JUDGES AND LAWYERS
VISIT TO UZBEKISTAN REPORT OF THE SPECIAL RAPPORTEUR ON THE INDEPENDENCE OF JUDGES AND LAWYERS A/HRC/44/47/ADD.1 NULL 2020 04 20T00:00:00 SR Independence of judges United Nations A/HRC/44/47/Add.1 General Assembly Distr.: General 20 April 2020 Original: UHRIA/HRC/44/47/ADD.1https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/08c34eb5-b125-4a78-b87a-52cd3ee6e682
VISSER v. the Netherlands
VISSER v. the Netherlands NLD 14/02/2002 00:00:00 27/10/2016 17:05:40 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair trial resulting in a conviction based on decisive extent on the use of an anonymous witness statement as EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4461
W.E.O. v. Sweden
W.E.O. v. Sweden CCPR/C/129/D/2741/2016 Communication number s : 2741/2016 Author: W.E.O. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 129 Country Sweden Submission date 26 Feb 2016 Date of decision 23 Jul 2020 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/129/D/2741/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2844/en-US
Winkler v. Austria
Winkler v. Austria CCPR/C/90/D/1468/2006 Communication number s : 1468/2006 Author: Hermann Winkler Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 90 Country Austria Submission date 31 Jan 2006 Date of decision 24 Jul 2007 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/90/D/1468/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1382/en-US
Working Group on Arbitrary Detention
Report to HRC e/cn.4/2003/8/add.2 from 24 May 2002 to 6 June 2002 24 October 2002 Working Group on Arbitrary Detention Australia E UNITED NATIONS Economic and Social Distr. Council GENERAL E/CN.4/2003/8/Add.2 24 October 2002 Original: ENGLISH COMMISSION UNSPe/cn.4/2003/8/add.2https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=e%2fcn.4%2f2003%2f8%2fadd.2&Lang=en
Working Group on Arbitrary Detention
Report to HRC E/CN.4/2003/8/Add.3 from 27 October 2002 to 10 November 2002 17 December 2002 Working Group on Arbitrary Detention Mexico E UNITED NATIONS Economic and Social Distr. Council GENERAL E/CN.4/2003/8/Add.3 17 December 2002 ENGLISH Original: UNSPE/CN.4/2003/8/Add.3https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=E%2fCN.4%2f2003%2f8%2fAdd.3&Lang=en
Working Group on Arbitrary Detention
Report to HRC E/CN.4/1999/63/Add.2 from 26 January 1998 to 6 February 1998 11 January 1999 Working Group on Arbitrary Detention Peru UNITED NATIONS E Distr. Economic and Social GENERAL Council E/CN.4/1999/63/Add.2 11 January 1999 ENGLISH Original: UNSPE/CN.4/1999/63/Add.2https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=E%2fCN.4%2f1999%2f63%2fAdd.2&Lang=en
Working Group on Enforced or Involuntary Disappearances
Report to HRC E/CN.4/2006/56/Add.1 from 5 July 2005 to 13 July 2005 17 January 2006 Working Group on Enforced or Involuntary Disappearances Colombia UNITED NATIONS E Economic and Social Distr. GENERAL Council E/CN.4/2006/56/Add.1 17 January 2006 Original: UNSPE/CN.4/2006/56/Add.1https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=E%2fCN.4%2f2006%2f56%2fAdd.1&Lang=en
Working Group on the issue of human rights and transnational corporations and other business enterprises
State comment on Report A/HRC/29/28/Add.4 from 18 August 2014 to 27 August 2014 15 May 2015 Working Group on the issue of human rights and transnational corporations and other business enterprises Azerbaijan United Nations A/HRC/29/28/Add.4 General UNSPA/HRC/29/28/Add.4https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f29%2f28%2fAdd.4&Lang=en
Working Group on the issue of human rights and transnational corporations and other business enterprises
Report to HRC A/HRC/29/28/Add.1 from 18 August 2014 to 27 August 2014 3 June 2015 Working Group on the issue of human rights and transnational corporations and other business enterprises Azerbaijan United Nations A/HRC/29/28/Add.1 General Assembly Distr.: UNSPA/HRC/29/28/Add.1https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f29%2f28%2fAdd.1&Lang=en
Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self-determination
Report to HRC A/HRC/33/43/Add.1 from 1 July 2015 to 8 July 2015 2 August 2016 Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self determination Tunisia United Nations UNSPA/HRC/33/43/Add.1https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f33%2f43%2fAdd.1&Lang=en
X, Y, A, B, C and D v. Greece
X Y A B C and D v. Greece CCPR/C/126/D/2701/2015 Communication number s : 2701/2015 Author: X Y A B C and D Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 126 Country Greece Submission date 25 Sep 2015 Date of decision 26 Jul 2019 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/126/D/2701/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2899/en-US
X and Y v. Switzerland
X and Y v. Switzerland CAT/C/66/D/776/2016 Communication number s : 776/2016 Author: X and Y represented by counsel Marcel Zirngast Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 66 Country Switzerland Submission date 19 Oct 2016 Date of decision 23 Apr JUTBCAT/C/66/D/776/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2581/en-US
X and Y v. Switzerland
X and Y v. Switzerland CAT/C/71/D/807/2017 Communication number s : 807/2017 Author: X and Y Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 71 Country Switzerland Submission date 27 Sep 2016 Date of decision 19 Jul 2021 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/71/D/807/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3372/en-US
X. v. Netherlands
X. v. Netherlands CCPR/C/107/D/1886/2009 Communication number s : 1886/2009 Author: X. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 107 Country Netherlands Submission date 22 Oct 2005 Date of decision 28 Mar 2013 Comment: Pursuant to rule 90 of JUTBCCPR/C/107/D/1886/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1279/en-US
Yasseen and Thomas v. Guyana
Yasseen and Thomas v. Guyana CCPR/C/62/D/676/1996 Communication number s : 676/1996 Author: Abdool Saleem Yasseen and Noel Thomas Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 62 Country Guyana Submission date 02 Feb 1996 Date of decision 30 Mar 1998 JUTBCCPR/C/62/D/676/1996https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/836/en-US
Yelitze Lisbeth Moreno de Castillo v. Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of)
Yelitze Lisbeth Moreno de Castillo v. Venezuela Bolivarian Republic of CCPR/C/121/D/2610/2015 Communication number s : 2610/2015 Author: Yelitze Lisbeth Moreno de Castillo Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 121 Country Venezuela Bolivarian JUTBCCPR/C/121/D/2610/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2478/en-US
Zare v. Sweden
Zare v. Sweden CAT/C/36/D/256/2004 Communication number s : 256/2004 Author: Mehdi Zare Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 36 Country Sweden Submission date 22 Sep 2004 Date of decision 12 May 2006 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/36/D/256/2004https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/114/en-US