Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 901 - 918 of 918
Third Evaluation Round Evaluation Report on Romania on Transparency of Party Funding (Theme II)
Third Evaluation Round Evaluation Report on Romania on Transparency of Party Funding Theme II ROU 2010 12 03 2011 03 15 Directorate General of Human Rights and Legal Affairs Directorate of Monitoring Strasbourg 3 December 2010 Public Greco Eval III Rep GRECOGreco-Eval-III-Rep-2010-1E-Final-Romania-PF-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=Greco-Eval-III-Rep-2010-1E-Final-Romania-PF-PUBLIC
Third Evaluation Round Evaluation Report on the Russian Federation Transparency of Party Funding (Theme II)
Third Evaluation Round Evaluation Report on the Russian Federation Transparency of Party Funding Theme II RUS 2012 03 23 2012 08 13 Strasbourg 22 March 2012 Public Greco Eval III Rep 2011 6E Theme II Third Evaluation Round Evaluation Report on the Russian GRECOGreco-Eval-III-Rep-2011-6E-Final-RussianFed-PF-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=Greco-Eval-III-Rep-2011-6E-Final-RussianFed-PF-PUBLIC
Third Evaluation Round Interim Compliance Report on Luxembourg “Incriminations (ETS 173 and 191, GPC 2)” * * * “Transparency of Political Party Funding”
Third Evaluation Round Interim Compliance Report on Luxembourg Incriminations ETS 173 and 191 GPC 2 Transparency of Political Party Funding LUX 2011 04 01 2011 04 05 Directorate General of Human Rights and Legal Affairs directorate of monitoring GRECOGreco-RC-III-2010-4E-Final-Interim-Rapp-Luxembourg-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=Greco-RC-III-2010-4E-Final-Interim-Rapp-Luxembourg-PUBLIC
Third Evaluation Round Second Compliance Report on Romania ”Incriminations (ETS 173 and 191, GPC 2)” * * * ”Transparency of Party Funding”
Third Evaluation Round Second Compliance Report on Romania Incriminations ETS 173 and 191 GPC 2 Transparency of Party Funding ROU 2014 12 12 2015 04 14 Adoption: 12 December 2014 Public Publication: 14 April 2015 Greco RC III 2014 22E Second Compliance GRECOGreco-RC-III-2014-22E-Final-Second-RC-Romania-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=Greco-RC-III-2014-22E-Final-Second-RC-Romania-PUBLIC
Third Opinion on Bulgaria
Third Opinion on Bulgaria BGR ACFC/OP/III 2014 001 2014 02 11 Strasbourg 30 July 2014 Public ACFC/OP/III 2014 001 ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES Third Opinion on Bulgaria adopted on 11 February FCNMACFC/OP/III(2014)001https://hudoc.fcnm.coe.int/eng?i=3rd_OP_Bulgaria_en
Third report on Poland
Third report on Poland POL 2004 12 17 2005 06 14 CRI 2005 25 Council of Europe European Commission against Racism and Intolerance Third report on Poland Adopted on 17 December 2004 Strasbourg 14 June 2005 Table of contents ECRIPOL-CbC-III-2005-025-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=POL-CbC-III-2005-025-ENG
Third report on Romania
Third report on Romania ROU 2005 06 24 2006 02 21 CRI 2006 3 Council of Europe European Commission against Racism and Intolerance Third report on Romania Adopted on 24 June 2005 Strasbourg 21 February 2006 Table of contents Foreword Executive summary I. ECRIROU-CbC-III-2006-003-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=ROU-CbC-III-2006-003-ENG
Third report on the Russian Federation
Third report on the Russian Federation RUS 2005 12 16 2006 05 16 CRI 2006 21 Council of Europe European Commission against Racism and Intolerance Third report on the Russian Federation Adopted on 16 December 2005 Strasbourg 16 May 2006 Table of contents ECRIRUS-CbC-III-2006-021-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=RUS-CbC-III-2006-021-ENG
Titiahonjo v. Cameroon
Titiahonjo v. Cameroon CCPR/C/91/D/1186/2003 Communication number s : 1186/2003 Author: Dorothy Kakem Titiahonjo Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 91 Country Cameroon Submission date 31 Jul 2002 Date of decision 26 Oct 2007 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/91/D/1186/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1359/en-US
URUGUAY: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
URUGUAY: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CAT/C/URY/CO/4 NULL 2022 10 04T00:00:00 CAT United Nations CAT/C/URY/CO/4 Convention against Torture Distr.: General 4 October 2022 and Other Cruel Inhuman English or Degrading Treatment Original: Spanish or Punishment UHRICAT/C/URY/CO/4https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/5c1b3551-72fa-40e4-a4c7-98655a880f31
W.K. v. Canada
W.K. v. Canada CCPR/C/122/D/2292/2013 Communication number s : 2292/2013 Author: W.K. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 122 Country Canada Submission date 23 Oct 2013 Date of decision 27 Mar 2018 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/122/D/2292/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2442/en-US
Winata and Li v. Australia
Winata and Li v. Australia CCPR/C/72/D/930/2000 Communication number s : 930/2000 Author: Hendrick Winata and So Lan Li Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 72 Country Australia Submission date 11 May 2000 Date of decision 26 Jul 2001 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/72/D/930/2000https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/929/en-US
Working Group on Arbitrary Detention
Report to HRC A/HRC/7/4/Add.2 from 23 April 2007 to 2 May 2007 11 October 2007 Working Group on Arbitrary Detention Norway UNITED NATIONS A General Assembly Distr. GENERAL A/HRC/7/4/Add.2 11 October 2007 Original: ENGLISH HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL Seventh UNSPA/HRC/7/4/Add.2https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f7%2f4%2fAdd.2&Lang=en
Working Group on Arbitrary Detention
Report to HRC A/HRC/4/40/Add.2 from 12 February 2006 to 22 February 2006 26 October 2006 Working Group on Arbitrary Detention Ecuador UNITED NATIONS A General Assembly Distr. GENERAL A/HRC/4/40/Add.2 26 October 2006 ENGLISH Original: SPANISH HUMAN RIGHTS UNSPA/HRC/4/40/Add.2https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f4%2f40%2fAdd.2&Lang=en
Working Group on Enforced or Involuntary Disappearances
Report to HRC A/HRC/27/49/Add.1 from 23 September 2013 to 30 September 2013 2 July 2014 Working Group on Enforced or Involuntary Disappearances Spain United Nations A/HRC/27/49/Add.1 General Assembly Distr.: General 2 July 2014 English Original: Spanish UNSPA/HRC/27/49/Add.1https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f27%2f49%2fAdd.1&Lang=en
X. v. Czech Republic v. Czech Republic
X. v. Czech Republic v. Czech Republic CCPR/C/113/D/1961/2010 Communication number s : 1961/2010 Author: X Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 113 Country Czech Republic Submission date 04 Jan 2010 Date of decision 02 Apr 2015 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/113/D/1961/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1952/en-US
fourth EVALUATION round Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament, judges and prosecutors SECOND COMPLIANCE REPORT LUXEMBOURG
fourth EVALUATION round Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament judges and prosecutors SECOND COMPLIANCE REPORT LUXEMBOURG LUX 2017 10 18 2017 10 20 I. INTRODUCTION The Second Compliance Report assesses the measures taken by the GRECOGrecoRC4-2017-17-Final-eng-Luxembourg-2ndRC-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=GrecoRC4-2017-17-Final-eng-Luxembourg-2ndRC-PUBLIC
fourth evaluation round Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament, judges and prosecutors COMPLIANCE REPORT LUXEMBOURG
fourth evaluation round Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament judges and prosecutors COMPLIANCE REPORT LUXEMBOURG LUX 2015 06 19 2015 07 01 I. INTRODUCTION The Compliance Report assesses the measures taken by the Luxembourg authorities GRECOGreco-RC-IV-2015-5E-Final-Luxembourg-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=Greco-RC-IV-2015-5E-Final-Luxembourg-PUBLIC