Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 1209
A.A. v. Sweden
A.A. v. Sweden CAT/C/72/D/918/2019 Communication number s : 918/2019 Author: A.A. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 72 Country Sweden Submission date 15 Feb 2019 Date of decision 24 Nov 2021 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCAT/C/72/D/918/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3078/en-US
A.E. v. Sweden
A.E. v. Sweden CCPR/C/128/D/3300/2019 Communication number s : 3300/2019 Author: A.E. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 128 Country Sweden Submission date 14 Jan 2019 Date of decision 13 Mar 2020 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/128/D/3300/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2830/en-US
A. R. and A. A. v. Canada
A. R. and A. A. v. Canada CAT/C/72/D/898/2018 Communication number s : 898/2018 Author: A. R. and A. A. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 72 Country Canada Submission date 16 Nov 2018 Date of decision 03 Dec 2021 Comment: This document JUTBCAT/C/72/D/898/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3112/en-US
Achabal Puertas v. Spain
Achabal Puertas v. Spain CCPR/C/107/D/1945/2010 Communication number s : 1945/2010 Author: Mar a Cruz Achabal Puertas Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 107 Country Spain Submission date 02 Nov 2009 Date of decision 27 Mar 2013 Comment: The JUTBCCPR/C/107/D/1945/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1317/en-US
Additional Protocol to the Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine concerning Genetic Testing for Health Purposes (CETS No. 203)
Additional Protocol to the Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine concerning Genetic Testing for Health Purposes CETS No. 203 203 Strasbourg 2008 11 27T00:00:00 Treaty open for signature by the Signatories to Treaty ETS 164 Strasbourg 2018 07 COECETS No. 203https://rm.coe.int/1680084824
Agiza v. Sweden
Agiza v. Sweden CAT/C/34/D/233/2003 Communication number s : 233/2003 Author: Ahmed Hussein Mustafa Kamil Agiza Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 34 Country Sweden Submission date 25 Jun 2003 Date of decision 20 May 2005 Comment: Decision on JUTBCAT/C/34/D/233/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/140/en-US
Alzery v. Sweden
Alzery v. Sweden CCPR/C/88/D/1416/2005 Communication number s : 1416/2005 Author: Mohammed Alzery Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 88 Country Sweden Submission date 29 Jul 2005 Date of decision 25 Oct 2006 Comment: Pursuant to rule 90 of JUTBCCPR/C/88/D/1416/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1300/en-US
Atasoy and Sarkut v. Türkiye
Atasoy and Sarkut v. T rkiye CCPR/C/104/D/1853 1854/2008 Communication number s : 1853/2008 1854/2008 Author: Cenk Atasoy and Arda Sarkut Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 104 Country T rkiye Submission date 08 Dec 2008 Date of decision 29 JUTBCCPR/C/104/D/1853-1854/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1627/en-US
B.B. v. Sweden
B.B. v. Sweden CCPR/C/131/D/3069/2017 Communication number s : 3069/2017 Author: B.B. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 131 Country Sweden Submission date 11 Dec 2017 Date of decision 16 Mar 2021 Comment: Joint opinion of Committee members JUTBCCPR/C/131/D/3069/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3248/en-US
BECKLES v. the United Kingdom
BECKLES v. the United Kingdom GBR 08/01/2003 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair hearing in criminal proceedings since the judge at the applicant s trial left the jury with the option of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2624
Bakhtiyari v. Australia
Bakhtiyari v. Australia CCPR/C/79/D/1069/2002 Communication number s : 1069/2002 Author: Ali Aqsar Bakhtiyari and Roqaiha Bakhtiyari Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 79 Country Australia Submission date 25 Mar 2002 Date of decision 29 Oct JUTBCCPR/C/79/D/1069/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1092/en-US
CASE OF A.A.M. v. SWEDEN
CASE OF A.A.M. v. SWEDEN 68519/10 LINDBERG C. O. SWE 4/3/2014 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Expulsion Conditional Iraq 350 620 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0403JUD006851910 FIFTH SECTION CASE OF A.A.M. v. SWEDEN Application ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0403JUD006851910https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-142085
CASE OF A AND B v. NORWAY
CASE OF A AND B v. NORWAY 24130/11 29758/11 KJELDAHL R. NOR 11/15/2016 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 Right not to be tried or punished twice general Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 Right not to be tried or punished twice Criminal ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1115JUD002413011https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-168972
CASE OF A. AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF A. AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 3455/05 BIRNBERG PIERCE AND PARTNERS GBR 2/19/2009 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 3 No violation of Art. 13 3 Preliminary objection rejected Government not precluded from raising defence under Art. 5 1 f or ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0219JUD000345505https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-91403
CASE OF A, B AND C v. IRELAND
CASE OF A B AND C v. IRELAND 25579/05 KAY J. IRL 12/16/2010 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed non exhaustion of domestic remedies Remainder inadmissible No violation of Art. 8 Violation of Art. 8 Non pecuniary damage award ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1216JUD002557905https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-102332
CASE OF A.B.V. v. RUSSIA
CASE OF A.B.V. v. RUSSIA 56987/15 THREEFOLD LEGAL ADVISORS LLC RUS 10/2/2018 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 Positive obligations Article 8 1 Respect for family life 451 634 425 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1002JUD005698715https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-186439
CASE OF A.B. v. THE NETHERLANDS
CASE OF A.B. v. THE NETHERLANDS 37328/97 N/A NLD 1/29/2002 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed non exhaustion Violation of Art. 8 in respect of control of correspondence with the Commission and with lawyer No violation of Art. 8 in respect of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0129JUD003732897https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-60019
CASE OF A.H. AND J.K. v. CYPRUS
CASE OF A.H. AND J.K. v. CYPRUS 41903/10 41911/10 CHARALAMBIDOU N. CYP 7/21/2015 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 5 Right to liberty and security Article 5 4 Review of lawfulness of detention Violation of Article 5 Right to liberty and security Article 5 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0721JUD004190310https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-156264
CASE OF A.K. v. LATVIA
CASE OF A.K. v. LATVIA 33011/08 OLSENA S. LVA 6/24/2014 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 Positive obligations Article 8 1 Respect for private life Pecuniary damage claim ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0624JUD003301108https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-145005
CASE OF A.L. v. AUSTRIA
CASE OF A.L. v. AUSTRIA 7788/11 ROSENKRANZ B. AUT 5/10/2012 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Expulsion Conditional Togo 350 620 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0510JUD000778811 FIRST SECTION CASE OF A.L. v. AUSTRIA Application no. ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0510JUD000778811https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-110803