Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 2001 - 2012 of 2012
Working Group on Arbitrary Detention (Country visit)
Report to HRC A/HRC/10/21/Add.4 from 22 October 2008 to 11 November 2008 9 February 2009 Working Group on Arbitrary Detention Country visit Ukraine UNITED NATIONS A Distr. GENERAL General Assembly A/HRC/10/21/Add.4 9 February 2009 Original: ENGLISH HUMAN UNSPA/HRC/10/21/Add.4https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f10%2f21%2fAdd.4&Lang=en
Working Group on Enforced or Involuntary Disappearances
Report to HRC A/HRC/27/49/Add.1 from 23 September 2013 to 30 September 2013 2 July 2014 Working Group on Enforced or Involuntary Disappearances Spain United Nations A/HRC/27/49/Add.1 General Assembly Distr.: General 2 July 2014 English Original: Spanish UNSPA/HRC/27/49/Add.1https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f27%2f49%2fAdd.1&Lang=en
Working Group on Enforced or Involuntary Disappearances
Report to HRC A/HRC/39/46/Add.2 from 27 June 2014 to 30 June 2014 10 September 2018 Working Group on Enforced or Involuntary Disappearances Montenegro United Nations A/HRC/39/46/Add.2 General Assembly Distr.: General 10 September 2018 English only Human UNSPA/HRC/39/46/Add.2https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f39%2f46%2fAdd.2&Lang=en
X. v. Austria
X. v. Austria CEDAW/C/64/D/67/2014 Communication number s : 067/2014 Author: X. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 64 Country Austria Submission date 15 Nov 2013 Date of decision 11 Jul 2016 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/64/D/67/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2108/en-US
X. v. Czech Republic v. Czech Republic
X. v. Czech Republic v. Czech Republic CCPR/C/113/D/1961/2010 Communication number s : 1961/2010 Author: X Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 113 Country Czech Republic Submission date 04 Jan 2010 Date of decision 02 Apr 2015 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/113/D/1961/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1952/en-US
X v. Switzerland
X v. Switzerland CAT/C/65/D/765/2016 Communication number s : 765/2016 Author: X represented by counsel Tarig Hassan Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 65 Country Switzerland Submission date 15 Aug 2016 Date of decision 23 Nov 2018 Comment: JUTBCAT/C/65/D/765/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2591/en-US
X v. Switzerland
X v. Switzerland CAT/C/71/D/900/2018 Communication number s : 900/2018 Author: X Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 71 Country Switzerland Submission date 04 Dec 2018 Date of decision 22 Jul 2021 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/71/D/900/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3362/en-US
X v. Switzerland
X v. Switzerland CAT/C/59/D/686/2015 Communication number s : 686/2015 Author: X Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 58 Country Switzerland Submission date 02 Jun 2015 Date of decision 05 Dec 2016 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/59/D/686/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2183/en-US
Young v. Australia
Young v. Australia CCPR/C/78/D/941/2000 Communication number s : 941/2000 Author: Edward Young Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 78 Country Australia Submission date 29 Jun 1999 Date of decision 06 Aug 2003 Comment: Committee members Ruth JUTBCCPR/C/78/D/941/2000https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1076/en-US
Z.K. and A.K. v. Switzerland
Z.K. and A.K. v. Switzerland CAT/C/63/D/698/2015 Communication number s : 698/2015 Author: Z.K. and A.K. represented by counsel Stephanie Motz Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 63 Country Switzerland Submission date 20 Aug 2015 Date of JUTBCAT/C/63/D/698/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2722/en-US
fourth EVALUATION round Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament, judges and prosecutors SECOND COMPLIANCE REPORT LUXEMBOURG
fourth EVALUATION round Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament judges and prosecutors SECOND COMPLIANCE REPORT LUXEMBOURG LUX 2017 10 18 2017 10 20 I. INTRODUCTION The Second Compliance Report assesses the measures taken by the GRECOGrecoRC4-2017-17-Final-eng-Luxembourg-2ndRC-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=GrecoRC4-2017-17-Final-eng-Luxembourg-2ndRC-PUBLIC
fourth evaluation round Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament, judges and prosecutors COMPLIANCE REPORT LUXEMBOURG
fourth evaluation round Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament judges and prosecutors COMPLIANCE REPORT LUXEMBOURG LUX 2015 06 19 2015 07 01 I. INTRODUCTION The Compliance Report assesses the measures taken by the Luxembourg authorities GRECOGreco-RC-IV-2015-5E-Final-Luxembourg-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=Greco-RC-IV-2015-5E-Final-Luxembourg-PUBLIC