Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 2121 - 2132 of 2132
Y.M. v. Russian Federation
Y.M. v. Russian Federation CCPR/C/116/D/2059/2011 Communication number s : 2059/2011 Author: Y.M. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 116 Country Russian Federation Submission date 05 Jul 2010 Date of decision 31 Mar 2016 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/116/D/2059/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2113/en-US
Y.W. v. Denmark
Y.W. v. Denmark CEDAW/C/60/D/51/2013 Communication number s : 051/2013 Author: Y.W. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 68 Country Denmark Submission date 02 Jan 2013 Date of decision 02 Mar 2015 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/60/D/51/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2052/en-US
Yakovitsky et al. v. Belarus
Yakovitsky et al. v. Belarus CCPR/C/128/D/2789/2016 Communication number s : 2789/2016 Author: Gennady Yakovitsky and Aleksandra Yakovitskaya Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 128 Country Belarus Submission date 15 Jul 2016 Date of decision JUTBCCPR/C/128/D/2789/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2825/en-US
Young v. Australia
Young v. Australia CCPR/C/78/D/941/2000 Communication number s : 941/2000 Author: Edward Young Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 78 Country Australia Submission date 29 Jun 1999 Date of decision 06 Aug 2003 Comment: Committee members Ruth JUTBCCPR/C/78/D/941/2000https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1076/en-US
Z.K. and A.K. v. Switzerland
Z.K. and A.K. v. Switzerland CAT/C/63/D/698/2015 Communication number s : 698/2015 Author: Z.K. and A.K. represented by counsel Stephanie Motz Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 63 Country Switzerland Submission date 20 Aug 2015 Date of JUTBCAT/C/63/D/698/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2722/en-US
Z. v. Australia
Z. v. Australia CAT/C/53/D/511/2012 Communication number s : 511/2012 Author: Z. represented by Norman Gibson Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 53 Country Australia Submission date 29 Sep 2011 Date of decision 26 Nov 2014 Comment: JUTBCAT/C/53/D/511/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2057/en-US
Z v. Australia
Z v. Australia CAT/C/71/D/802/2017 Communication number s : 802/2017 Author: Z Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 71 Country Australia Submission date 01 Feb 2017 Date of decision 21 Jul 2021 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCAT/C/71/D/802/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3368/en-US
Z v. Switzerland v. Switzerland
Z v. Switzerland v. Switzerland CAT/C/54/D/468/2011 Communication number s : 468/2011 Author: Z Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 54 Country Switzerland Submission date 20 Jun 2011 Date of decision 05 May 2015 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/54/D/468/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1981/en-US
Zhanysbek Khalmamatov v. Kyrgyzstan
Zhanysbek Khalmamatov v. Kyrgyzstan CCPR/C/128/D/2384/2014 Communication number s : 2384/2014 Author: Zhanysbek Khalmamatov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 128 Country Kyrgyzstan Submission date 13 Sep 2012 Date of decision 13 Mar 2020 JUTBCCPR/C/128/D/2384/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2818/en-US
Zwaan-de Vries v. Netherlands
Zwaan de Vries v. Netherlands CCPR/C/29/D/182/1984 Communication number s : 182/1984 Author: F.H. Zwaan de Vries Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 29 Country Netherlands Submission date 28 Sep 1984 Date of decision 09 Apr 1987 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/29/D/182/1984https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/532/en-US
fourth EVALUATION round Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament, judges and prosecutors SECOND COMPLIANCE REPORT LUXEMBOURG
fourth EVALUATION round Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament judges and prosecutors SECOND COMPLIANCE REPORT LUXEMBOURG LUX 2017 10 18 2017 10 20 I. INTRODUCTION The Second Compliance Report assesses the measures taken by the GRECOGrecoRC4-2017-17-Final-eng-Luxembourg-2ndRC-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=GrecoRC4-2017-17-Final-eng-Luxembourg-2ndRC-PUBLIC
fourth evaluation round Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament, judges and prosecutors COMPLIANCE REPORT LUXEMBOURG
fourth evaluation round Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament judges and prosecutors COMPLIANCE REPORT LUXEMBOURG LUX 2015 06 19 2015 07 01 I. INTRODUCTION The Compliance Report assesses the measures taken by the Luxembourg authorities GRECOGreco-RC-IV-2015-5E-Final-Luxembourg-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=Greco-RC-IV-2015-5E-Final-Luxembourg-PUBLIC