Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 3281 - 3300 of 3805
GREVIO’s (Baseline) Evaluation Report on legislative and other measures giving effect to the provisions of the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence (Istanbul Convention) PORTUGAL
GREVIO s Baseline Evaluation Report on legislative and other measures giving effect to the provisions of the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence Istanbul Convention PORTUGAL PRT a111a a13 GREVIOGREVIO-Inf(2018)16_Portugal_Baseline_Evaluation_Report_enghttps://hudoc.grevio.coe.int/eng?i=GREVIO-Inf(2018)16_Portugal_Baseline_Evaluation_Report_eng
GREVIO’s (Baseline) Evaluation Report on legislative and other measures giving effect to the provisions of the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence (Istanbul Convention) - SWITZERLAND
GREVIO s Baseline Evaluation Report on legislative and other measures giving effect to the provisions of the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence Istanbul Convention SWITZERLAND CHE a112 a9 GREVIOGREVIO-Inf(2022)27_Switzerland_Baseline_Evaluation_Report_enghttps://hudoc.grevio.coe.int/eng?i=GREVIO-Inf(2022)27_Switzerland_Baseline_Evaluation_Report_eng
Gallardo Martínez et al. v. Mexico
Gallardo Mart nez et al. v. Mexico CAT/C/72/D/992/2020 Communication number s : 992/2020 Author: Dami n Gallardo Mart nez on his own behalf and on that of his four minor children Yolanda Barranco Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 72 Country JUTBCAT/C/72/D/992/2020https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3340/en-US
Gauthier v. Canada
Gauthier v. Canada CCPR/C/65/D/633/1995 Communication number s : 633/1995 Author: Robert Gauthier Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 65 Country Canada Submission date 01 Jan 1995 Date of decision 07 Apr 1999 Comment: Exact date of submission JUTBCCPR/C/65/D/633/1995https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/768/en-US
Gelazauskas v. Lithuania
Gelazauskas v. Lithuania CCPR/C/77/D/836/1998 Communication number s : 836/1998 Author: Kestutis Gelazauskas Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 77 Country Lithuania Submission date 14 Apr 1997 Date of decision 17 Mar 2003 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/77/D/836/1998https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1036/en-US
Gemma Beasley v. Australia
Gemma Beasley v. Australia CRPD/C/15/D/11/2013 Communication number s : 011/2013 Author: Gemma Beasley Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 15 Country Australia Submission date 29 Apr 2013 Date of decision 01 Apr 2016 Comment: This document has JUTBCRPD/C/15/D/11/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2142/en-US
Georgopoulos, Georgopoulou and their seven children v. Greece
Georgopoulos Georgopoulou and their seven children v. Greece CCPR/C/99/D/1799/2008 Communication number s : 1799/2008 Author: Antonios Georgopoulos Chrysafo Georgopoulou and their seven children Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 99 Country JUTBCCPR/C/99/D/1799/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1629/en-US
Gillot et al. v. France
Gillot et al. v. France CCPR/C/75/D/932/2000 Communication number s : 932/2000 Author: Marie H l ne Gillot et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 75 Country France Submission date 25 Jun 1999 Date of decision 15 Jul 2002 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/75/D/932/2000https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1011/en-US
Gintaras Jagminas v. Lithuania
Gintaras Jagminas v. Lithuania CCPR/C/126/D/2670/2015 Communication number s : 2670/2015 Author: Gintaras Jagminas Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 126 Country Lithuania Submission date 05 Feb 2015 Date of decision 24 Jul 2019 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/126/D/2670/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2795/en-US
Government comments on the fourth report on Norway
Government comments on the fourth report on Norway NOR 2008 06 20 2009 02 24 Government comments on the report on NORWAY APPENDIX APPENDIXThe following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in Norway ECRI ECRINOR-COM-IV-2009-004-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=NOR-COM-IV-2009-004-ENG
Government comments on the second report on Italy
Government comments on the second report on Italy ITA 2001 06 22 2002 04 23 The following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in Italy. APPENDIX ECRI wishes to point out that the analysis contained in its ECRIITA-COM-II-2002-004-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=ITA-COM-II-2002-004-ENG
Government comments on the third report on Cyprus
Government comments on the third report on Cyprus CYP 2005 12 16 2006 05 16 APPENDIX The following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in Cyprus ECRI wishes to point out that the analysis contained in its ECRICYP-COM-III-2006-017-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=CYP-COM-III-2006-017-ENG
Government comments on the third report on Latvia
Government comments on the third report on Latvia LVA 2007 06 29 2008 02 12 APPENDIX The following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in Latvia ECRI wishes to point out that the analysis contained in its ECRILVA-COM-III-2008-002-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=LVA-COM-III-2008-002-ENG
Government comments on the third report on Ukraine
Government comments on the third report on Ukraine UKR 2007 06 29 2008 02 12 APPENDIX The following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in Ukraine ECRI wishes to point out that the analysis contained in ECRIUKR-COM-III-2008-004-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=UKR-COM-III-2008-004-ENG
Gruca v. Poland
Gruca v. Poland CCPR/C/114/D/2183/2012 Communication number s : 2183/2012 Author: Gruca Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 114 Country Poland Submission date 15 Apr 2012 Date of decision 23 Jul 2015 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/114/D/2183/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1956/en-US
Guengueng et al. v. Senegal
Guengueng et al. v. Senegal CAT/C/36/D/181/2001 Communication number s : 181/2001 Author: Suleymane Guengueng et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 36 Country Senegal Submission date 18 Apr 2001 Date of decision 17 May 2006 Comment: In JUTBCAT/C/36/D/181/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/116/en-US
Guezout and Rakik v. Algeria
Guezout and Rakik v. Algeria CCPR/C/105/D/1753/2008 Communication number s : 1753/2008 Author: Yamina Guezout and her two sons Abderrahim and Bachir Rakik Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 105 Country Algeria Submission date 22 Nov 2007 Date JUTBCCPR/C/105/D/1753/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1653/en-US
H.A. and G.H. v. Netherlands
H.A. and G.H. v. Netherlands CAT/C/63/D/719/2015 Communication number s : 719/2015 Author: H.A. and G.H. represented by counsel P.J. Schuller Type of decision: Admissibility decision Session No 63 Country Netherlands Submission date 02 Dec 2015 Date of JUTBCAT/C/63/D/719/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2745/en-US
H.L. v. Australia
H.L. v. Australia CAT/C/71/D/754/2016 Communication number s : 754/2016 Author: H.L. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 71 Country Australia Submission date 27 Apr 2016 Date of decision 22 Jul 2021 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/71/D/754/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3358/en-US
H.R.E.S. v. Switzerland
H.R.E.S. v. Switzerland CAT/C/64/D/783/2016 Communication number s : 783/2016 Author: H.R.E.S. represented by counsel Angela Stettler and Urs Ebn ther Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 64 Country Switzerland Submission date 15 Nov 2016 Date JUTBCAT/C/64/D/783/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2466/en-US