Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 55
Aalbersberg et al. v. Netherlands
Aalbersberg et al. v. Netherlands CCPR/C/87/D/1440/2005 Communication number s : 1440/2005 Author: Aalbersberg and 2 084 other Dutch citizens Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 87 Country Netherlands Submission date 02 Aug 2005 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/87/D/1440/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1291/en-US
Alzery v. Sweden
Alzery v. Sweden CCPR/C/88/D/1416/2005 Communication number s : 1416/2005 Author: Mohammed Alzery Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 88 Country Sweden Submission date 29 Jul 2005 Date of decision 25 Oct 2006 Comment: Pursuant to rule 90 of JUTBCCPR/C/88/D/1416/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1300/en-US
Brun v. France
Brun v. France CCPR/C/88/D/1453/2006 Communication number s : 1453/2006 Author: Andr Brun Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 88 Country France Submission date 15 Nov 2005 Date of decision 18 Oct 2006 Comment: Pursuant to rule 90 of the JUTBCCPR/C/88/D/1453/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1319/en-US
CASE OF BABAR AHMAD AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF BABAR AHMAD AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 24027/07 11949/08 36742/08 66911/09 67354/09 PEIRCE G. COOPER B. ARANI M. JONES A. BRANDON B. RAJA A. JONES J. GBR 4/10/2012 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0410JUD002402707https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-110267
CASE OF GEORGIA v. RUSSIA (II)
CASE OF GEORGIA v. RUSSIA II 38263/08 RUS 1/21/2021 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objections dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Ratione loci ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0121JUD003826308https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-207757
CASE OF HARKINS AND EDWARDS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF HARKINS AND EDWARDS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 9146/07 32650/07 Aslam Y. Rasool L. GBR 1/17/2012 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Extradition Conditional United States of America No violation ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0117JUD000914607https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-108599
CASE OF T. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF T. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 24724/94 N/A GBR 12/16/1999 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Article 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Degrading treatment Inhuman treatment ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:1216JUD002472494https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58593
CASE OF V. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF V. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 24888/94 N/A GBR 12/16/1999 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Article 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Degrading treatment Inhuman treatment ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:1216JUD002488894https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58594
CASE OF VINTER AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF VINTER AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 66069/09 130/10 3896/10 CREIGHTON S. WEATHERBY P. VAN ZYL SMIT D. WOODS B. HORWELL R. HINDMARSH L. CHIVERS SOLICITORS BINGLEY McKONE M. GBR 7/9/2013 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0709JUD006606909https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-122664
CASE OF VINTER AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF VINTER AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 66069/09 130/10 3896/10 CREIGHTON S. WOODS B. Chivers Solicitors GBR 1/17/2012 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Degrading punishment Inhuman ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0117JUD006606909https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-108610
Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (ETS No. 005)
Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms ETS No. 005 005 Rome 1950 11 04T00:00:00 Treaty open for signature by the member States of the Council of Europe and for accession by the European Union Rome 1953 09 03T00:00:00 10 COEETS No. 005https://rm.coe.int/1680a2353d
D.V. and H.V. v. Czech Republic
D.V. and H.V. v. Czech Republic CCPR/C/105/D/1848/2008 Communication number s : 1848/2008 Author: D.V. and H.V. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 105 Country Czech Republic Submission date 07 Sep 2006 Date of decision 23 Jul 2012 JUTBCCPR/C/105/D/1848/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1343/en-US
Dayras et al. v. France
Dayras et al. v. France CEDAW/C/44/D/13/2007 Communication number s : 013/2007 Author: Mich le Dayras Nelly Campo Trumel Sylvie Delange Fr d rique Remy Cremieu Micheline Zeghouani H l ne Muzard Fekkar and Ad le Daufrene Levrard Type of decision: JUTBCEDAW/C/44/D/13/2007https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1712/en-US
F.A.J. and B.M.R.A. v. Spain
F.A.J. and B.M.R.A. v. Spain CCPR/C/130/D/3599/2019 Communication number s : 3599/2019 Author: F.A.J. and B.M.R.A. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 130 Country Spain Submission date 14 Jan 2019 Date of decision 28 Oct 2020 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/130/D/3599/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3286/en-US
G. K. v. Netherlands
G. K. v. Netherlands CCPR/C/104/D/1801/2008 Communication number s : 1801/2008 Author: G. K. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 104 Country Netherlands Submission date 30 Jul 2008 Date of decision 22 Mar 2012 Comment: Pursuant to rule 90 of JUTBCCPR/C/104/D/1801/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1660/en-US
G. v. Australia
G. v. Australia CCPR/C/119/D/2172/2012 Communication number s : 2172/2012 Author: G. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 119 Country Australia Submission date 02 Dec 2011 Date of decision 17 Mar 2017 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/119/D/2172/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2220/en-US
Gratzinger v. Czech Republic
Gratzinger v. Czech Republic CCPR/C/91/D/1463/2006 Communication number s : 1463/2006 Author: Peter and Eva Gratzinger Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 91 Country Czech Republic Submission date 12 Feb 2006 Date of decision 25 Oct 2007 JUTBCCPR/C/91/D/1463/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1383/en-US
Hamida v. Canada
Hamida v. Canada CCPR/C/98/D/1544/2007 Communication number s : 1544/2007 Author: Mehrez Ben Abde Hamida Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 98 Country Canada Submission date 22 Jan 2007 Date of decision 18 Mar 2010 Comment: Pursuant to rule JUTBCCPR/C/98/D/1544/2007https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1562/en-US
Human Rights Council adopts the outcomes of the Universal Periodic Review of Belize, Chad, China and Malta
Human Rights CouncilMORNING 15 March 2019 The Human Rights Council this morning adopted the Universal Periodic Review outcomes of Belize Chad China and Malta. Raineldo Urbina First Secretary at the Embassy of Belize in Brussels said Belize had reviewed UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/news/2019/03/human-rights-council-adopts-outcomes-universal-periodic-review-belize-chad-china-and
“I Elpida” — The Cultural Association of Greek Gypsies from Halandri and Suburbs, and Stylianos Kalamiotis v. Greece
I Elpida The Cultural Association of Greek Gypsies from Halandri and Suburbs and Stylianos Kalamiotis v. Greece CCPR/C/118/D/2242/2013 Communication number s : 2242/2013 Author: I Elpida The Cultural Association of Greek Gypsies from Halandri and Suburbs JUTBCCPR/C/118/D/2242/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2180/en-US