Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 853
2nd RC4 Spain
2nd RC4 Spain ESP 2021 03 25 2021 09 30 I. INTRODUCTION The Fourth Round Evaluation Report on Spain was adopted at GRECO s 62nd Plenary Meeting 6 December 2013 and made public on 15 January 2014 following authorisation by Spain. The Fourth Evaluation GRECOGrecoRC4(2021)3-Final-eng-Spain-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=GrecoRC4(2021)3-Final-eng-Spain-PUBLIC
3. International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 3. International Covenant on Economic Social and Cultural Rights New York 16 December 1966 Entry into force : 3 January 1976 in accordance with article 27. 1 Registration : 3 January 1976 No. UNIV-3https://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-3&chapter=4&clang=_en
4. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 4. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights New York 16 December 1966 Entry into force : 23 March 1976 in accordance with article 49 for all provisions except those of article 41 UNIV-4https://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-4&chapter=4&clang=_en
5th Round Evaluation Report on Poland
5th Round Evaluation Report on Poland POL 2018 12 07 2019 01 28 Adoption: 7 December 2018 Publication: 28 January 2019 Public GrecoEval5Rep 2018 1 FIFTH EVALUATION ROUND Preventing corruption and promoting integrity in central governments top executive GRECOGrecoEval5Rep(2018)1-Final-eng-Poland-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=GrecoEval5Rep(2018)1-Final-eng-Poland-PUBLIC
A.D. v. Spain
A.D. v. Spain CRC/C/83/D/21/2017 Communication number s : 021/2017 Author: A.D. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 83 Country Spain Submission date 02 Jun 2017 Date of decision 04 Feb 2020 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCRC/C/83/D/21/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2633/en-US
A.P. v. Finland
A.P. v. Finland CAT/C/60/D/465/2011 Communication number s : 465/2011 Author: A.P. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 60 Country Finland Submission date 14 Apr 2011 Date of decision 10 May 2017 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/60/D/465/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3432/en-US
AFANASYEV v. Ukraine
AFANASYEV v. Ukraine UKR 05/07/2005 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: These cases concern physical or psychological torture and/or ill treatment by the police mostly in order to obtain confessions substantive violations of Article 3 lack of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31348
Abbahah v. Morocco
Abbahah v. Morocco CAT/C/72/D/871/2018 Communication number s : 871/2018 Author: Sidi Abdallah Abbahah Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 72 Country Morocco Submission date 09 May 2018 Date of decision 24 Nov 2021 Comment: This document has JUTBCAT/C/72/D/871/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3120/en-US
Abdelli v. Tunisia
Abdelli v. Tunisia CAT/C/31/D/188/2001 Communication number s : 188/2001 Author: Imed Abdelli Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 31 Country Tunisia Submission date 29 Jun 2000 Date of decision 14 Nov 2003 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/31/D/188/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/167/en-US
BAHRAIN: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
BAHRAIN: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS E/C.12/BHR/CO/1 NULL 2022 08 03T00:00:00 CESCR United Nations E/C.12/BHR/CO/1 Economic and Social Council Distr.: General 4 August 2022 Original: English Committee on Economic Social and Cultural Rights Concluding UHRIE/C.12/BHR/CO/1https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/18e467c9-deff-4ae2-b9f4-cd401c8e7df1
BAK v. Poland
BAK v. Poland POL 16/04/2007 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: The cases of Bak and Majewski concern the excessive length of criminal and civil proceedings respectively violations of Article 6 1 . They also concern certain problems in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20594
BOLIVIA : OBSERVATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ADDRESSED TO THE STATE PARTY
BOLIVIA : OBSERVATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ADDRESSED TO THE STATE PARTY CAT/OP/BOL/3 NULL 2018 07 24T00:00:00 SPT United Nations CAT/OP/BOL/3 Optional Protocol to the Distr.: General Convention against Torture 24 July 2018 English and Other Cruel Inhuman UHRICAT/OP/BOL/3https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/aacac74c-f65f-4e75-9cba-b614550a2d14
BRAZIL: REPORT ON SPT VISIT
BRAZIL: REPORT ON SPT VISIT CAT/OP/BRA/3 NULL 2016 02 16T00:00:00 SPT United Nations CAT/OP/BRA/3 Optional Protocol to the Distr.: General Convention against Torture 16 February 2017 and Other Cruel Inhuman Original: English English French and Spanish UHRICAT/OP/BRA/3https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/f228c6bb-e0ac-4e18-8282-7544b8ab68a8
Bessis v. France
Bessis v. France CCPR/C/133/D/3215/2018 Communication number s : 3215/2018 Author: Philippe Rudyard Bessis Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 133 Country France Submission date 26 Oct 2017 Date of decision 13 Oct 2021 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/133/D/3215/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3114/en-US
CASE OF A AND B v. ROMANIA
CASE OF A AND B v. ROMANIA 48442/16 48831/16 DRAGOMIR D. E. ROU 6/2/2020 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objections dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Art. 35 3 a Abuse of the right of application No violation of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0602JUD004844216https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-202621
CASE OF A AND OTHERS v. DENMARK
CASE OF A AND OTHERS v. DENMARK 20826/92 N/A DNK 2/8/1996 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 6 1 A Eg C D E F and G No violation of Art. 6 1 Feldskov and Lykkeskov Jacobsen Non pecuniary damage financial award Costs and expenses partial award Convention ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0208JUD002082692https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57969
CASE OF A, B AND C v. LATVIA
CASE OF A B AND C v. LATVIA 30808/11 MOLA I. LVA 3/31/2016 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed Article 34 Victim No violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 Positive obligations Article 8 1 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0331JUD003080811https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-161741
CASE OF A.K. v. LATVIA
CASE OF A.K. v. LATVIA 33011/08 OLSENA S. LVA 6/24/2014 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 Positive obligations Article 8 1 Respect for private life Pecuniary damage claim ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0624JUD003301108https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-145005
CASE OF A. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF A. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 35373/97 N/A GBR 12/17/2002 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 6 1 as regards parliamentary immunity No violation of Art. 6 1 as regards lack of legal aid No violation of Art. 8 No violation of Art. 14 6 No violation of Art. ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:1217JUD003537397https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-60822
CASE OF ABDULAZIZ, CABALES AND BALKANDALI v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF ABDULAZIZ CABALES AND BALKANDALI v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 9214/80 9473/81 9474/81 N/A GBR 5/28/1985 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 14 8 Violation of Art. 13 Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Costs and expenses award Convention ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1985:0528JUD000921480https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57416