Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 101 - 120 of 1004
CASE OF BERNH LARSEN HOLDING AS AND OTHERS v. NORWAY
CASE OF BERNH LARSEN HOLDING AS AND OTHERS v. NORWAY 24117/08 HATLAND T. NOR 3/14/2013 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 1 Respect for correspondence Respect for home Section 3 5 1 3 6 1 and sub ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0314JUD002411708https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-117133
CASE OF BEUZE v. BELGIUM
CASE OF BEUZE v. BELGIUM 71409/10 PACI D. BEL 11/9/2018 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 6 Right to a fair trial Article 6 Criminal proceedings Article 6 1 Fair hearing Article 6 3 Rights of defence Article 6 3 c Defence through legal assistance Non ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1109JUD007140910https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-187802
CASE OF BEYELER v. ITALY
CASE OF BEYELER v. ITALY 33202/96 N/A ITA 1/5/2000 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection rejected estoppel Violation of P1 1 Not necessary to examine Art. 14 No separate issue under Art. 18 Just satisfaction reserved Law no. 1089 of 1 June 1939 sections 3 30 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0105JUD003320296https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58832
CASE OF BEZICHERI v. ITALY
CASE OF BEZICHERI v. ITALY 11400/85 N/A ITA 10/25/1989 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 5 4 Pecuniary damage claim dismissed Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Costs and expenses claim dismissed 448 474 481 216 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1989:1025JUD001140085https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57439
CASE OF BIANCARDI v. ITALY
CASE OF BIANCARDI v. ITALY 77419/16 FRANCESCHELLI M. ITA 11/25/2021 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 10 Freedom of expression general Article 10 1 Freedom of expression Article 11 of Legislative Decree no. 196 of 2003 451 429 149 148 265 579 379 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1125JUD007741916https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-213827
CASE OF BIG BROTHER WATCH AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF BIG BROTHER WATCH AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 58170/13 62322/14 24960/15 CAREY D. CURLING R. NORTON E. GBR 9/13/2018 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Manifestly ill founded Violation of Article 8 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0913JUD005817013https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-186048
CASE OF BIG BROTHER WATCH AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF BIG BROTHER WATCH AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 58170/13 62322/14 24960/15 CAREY D. CURLING R. NORTON E. GBR 5/25/2021 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 34 Individual applications Art. 34 Victim Violation of Article 8 Right to ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0525JUD005817013https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-210077
CASE OF BILGIN v. TURKEY
CASE OF BILGIN v. TURKEY 23819/94 N/A TUR 11/16/2000 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 3 Violation of Art. 8 P1 1 Violation of Art. 13 No violation of Art. 14 or 18 Failure to comply with obligations under former Art. 25 1 Art. 34 Pecuniary damage financial ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:1116JUD002381994https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58987
CASE OF BLADET TROMSØ AND STENSAAS v. NORWAY
CASE OF BLADET TROMS AND STENSAAS v. NORWAY 21980/93 N/A NOR 5/20/1999 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 10 Pecuniary damage financial award Costs and expenses award domestic proceedings Costs and expenses award Convention proceedings Penal Code Articles 247 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0520JUD002198093https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58369
CASE OF BLAKE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF BLAKE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 68890/01 Ms MOLE N. AIRE Centre Mr TUGENDHAT M. Q.C. Messrs CHRISTIE I. and WHALE S. counsel Messrs BIRNBERG B. RIZVI R. lawyers Pr. SIMPSON B. Q.C. FBA FAAS and Pr. JONES G. Q.C. GBR 9/26/2006 12:00:00 AM Violation of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0926JUD006889001https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-76995
CASE OF BORGERS v. BELGIUM
CASE OF BORGERS v. BELGIUM 12005/86 N/A BEL 10/30/1991 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 6 1 Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Costs and expenses award Convention proceedings Judicial Code Articles 141 409 413 418 1107 1109 445 136 119 440 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1991:1030JUD001200586https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57720
CASE OF BOZANO v. FRANCE
CASE OF BOZANO v. FRANCE 9990/82 N/A FRA 12/18/1986 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection rejected incompatibility Preliminary objection rejected non exhaustion of domestic remedies Violation of Art. 5 1 Not necessary to examine Art. 18 5 1 and P4 2 Pecuniary ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1986:1218JUD000999082https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57448
CASE OF BRANDSTETTER v. AUSTRIA
CASE OF BRANDSTETTER v. AUSTRIA 11170/84 12876/87 13468/87 N/A AUT 8/28/1991 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection rejected non exhaustion of domestic remedies Violation of Art. 6 1 No violation of Art. 6 1 6 3 d No violation of Art. 6 3 c Pecuniary damage ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1991:0828JUD001117084https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57683
CASE OF BRICMONT v. BELGIUM
CASE OF BRICMONT v. BELGIUM 10857/84 N/A BEL 7/7/1989 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection rejected non exhaustion Violation of Art. 6 Pecuniary damage claim dismissed Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Costs and expenses award domestic ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1989:0707JUD001085784https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57611
CASE OF BRINCAT v. ITALY
CASE OF BRINCAT v. ITALY 13867/88 N/A ITA 11/26/1992 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 5 3 Pecuniary damage claim dismissed Non pecuniary damage financial award Costs and expenses partial award domestic proceedings Costs and expenses partial award Convention ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1992:1126JUD001386788https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57769
CASE OF BRITISH-AMERICAN TOBACCO COMPANY LTD v. THE NETHERLANDS
CASE OF BRITISH AMERICAN TOBACCO COMPANY LTD v. THE NETHERLANDS 19589/92 N/A NLD 11/20/1995 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 6 1 Not necessary to examine Art. 13 No separate issue under P1 1 Act concerning administrative jurisdiction as to decisions of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:1120JUD001958992https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57953
CASE OF BROGAN AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF BROGAN AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 11209/84 11234/84 11266/84 11386/85 N/A GBR 11/29/1988 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 5 3 Violation of Art. 5 5 No violation of Art. 5 1 No violation of Art. 5 4 Not necessary to examine Art. 13 Just ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1988:1129JUD001120984https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57450
CASE OF BROZICEK v. ITALY
CASE OF BROZICEK v. ITALY 10964/84 N/A ITA 12/19/1989 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection rejected non exhaustion Violation of Art. 6 1 Violation of Art. 6 3 a Pecuniary damage claim dismissed Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Costs and ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1989:1219JUD001096484https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57612
CASE OF BRUMARESCU v. ROMANIA
CASE OF BRUMARESCU v. ROMANIA 28342/95 N/A ROU 10/28/1999 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 6 1 by reason of lack of fair hearing Violation of Art. 6 1 by reason of refusal of right of access to court Violation of P1 1 Just satisfaction reserved Decree no. ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:1028JUD002834295https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58337
CASE OF BRYAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF BRYAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 19178/91 N/A GBR 11/22/1995 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 6 1 Town and Country Planning Act 1990 sections 172 174 2 175 3 289 Planning Inspectorate Executive Agency Framework Document 1992 Town and Country Planning ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:1122JUD001917891https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57954