Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 41 - 60 of 4100
A.M. v. Democratic Republic of the Congo,France
A.M. v. Democratic Republic of the Congo France CAT/C/44/D/302/2006 Communication number s : 302/2006 Author: A.M. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 44 Country Democratic Republic of the Congo France Submission date 25 Sep 2006 Date of JUTBCAT/C/44/D/302/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/72/en-US
A.N.A. v. Denmark
A.N.A. v. Denmark CEDAW/C/73/D/94/2015 Communication number s : 094/2015 Author: A.N.A. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 73 Country Denmark Submission date 14 Sep 2015 Date of decision 15 Jul 2019 Comment: This document has no JUTBCEDAW/C/73/D/94/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2656/en-US
A.N. v. Burundi
A.N. v. Burundi CAT/C/60/D/612/2014 Communication number s : 612/2014 Author: A.N. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 60 Country Burundi Submission date 24 Mar 2014 Date of decision 02 May 2017 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/60/D/612/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3018/en-US
A.P.J. v. Denmark
A.P.J. v. Denmark CCPR/C/119/D/2253/2013 Communication number s : 2253/2013 Author: A.P.J. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 119 Country Denmark Submission date 10 Jun 2013 Date of decision 16 Mar 2017 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/119/D/2253/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2266/en-US
A.P. v. Russian Federation
A.P. v. Russian Federation CCPR/C/107/D/1857/2008 Communication number s : 1857/2008 Author: A.P. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 107 Country Russian Federation Submission date 20 May 2008 Date of decision 28 Mar 2013 Comment: The JUTBCCPR/C/107/D/1857/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1326/en-US
A. P. v. Ukraine
A. P. v. Ukraine CCPR/C/105/D/1834/2008 Communication number s : 1834/2008 Author: A. P. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 105 Country Ukraine Submission date 01 Nov 2007 Date of decision 23 Jul 2012 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/105/D/1834/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1537/en-US
A.R.U. v. Netherlands
A.R.U. v. Netherlands CCPR/C/49/D/509/1992 Communication number s : 509/1992 Author: A.R.U. name deleted Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 49 Country Netherlands Submission date 21 Apr 1992 Date of decision 19 Oct 1993 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/49/D/509/1992https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/393/en-US
A.S., D.I., O.I. and G.D. v. Italy
A.S. D.I. O.I. and G.D. v. Italy CCPR/C/130/D/3042/2017 Communication number s : 3042/2017 Author: A.S. D.I. O.I. and G.D. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 130 Country Italy Submission date 19 May 2017 Date of decision 04 Nov 2020 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/130/D/3042/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3275/en-US
A.S.G.M. v. Denmark
A.S.G.M. v. Denmark CCPR/C/121/D/2612/2015 Communication number s : 2612/2015 Author: A.S.G.M. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 121 Country Denmark Submission date 13 May 2015 Date of decision 09 Nov 2017 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/121/D/2612/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2356/en-US
A.S.M. and R.A.H. v. Denmark,Italy
A.S.M. and R.A.H. v. Denmark Italy CCPR/C/117/D/2378/2014 Communication number s : 2378/2014 Author: A.S.M. and R.A.H. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 117 Country Denmark Italy Submission date 14 Apr 2014 Date of decision 07 Jul 2016 JUTBCCPR/C/117/D/2378/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2245/en-US
A.S. v. Denmark
A.S. v. Denmark CEDAW/C/69/D/80/2015 Communication number s : 080/2014 Author: A.S. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 69 Country Denmark Submission date Date of decision 26 Feb 2018 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCEDAW/C/69/D/80/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2425/en-US
A.S. v. Denmark
A.S. v. Denmark CEDAW/C/69/D/80/2015 Communication number s : 080/2015 Author: A.S. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 69 Country Denmark Submission date 28 Jan 2015 Date of decision 26 Feb 2018 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/69/D/80/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2636/en-US
A.S. v. Sweden
A.S. v. Sweden CAT/C/74/D/949/2019 Communication number s : 949/2019 Author: A.S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 74 Country Sweden Submission date 26 Jul 2019 Date of decision 27 Jul 2022 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCAT/C/74/D/949/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3611/en-US
A.W.K. v. New Zealand
A.W.K. v. New Zealand CCPR/C/112/D/1998/2010 Communication number s : 1998/2010 Author: A.W.K. represented by counsel Frank Deliu Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 112 Country New Zealand Submission date 02 Aug 2010 Date of decision 28 JUTBCCPR/C/112/D/1998/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1896/en-US
A and B v. Azerbaijan
A and B v. Azerbaijan CAT/C/74/D/905/2018 Communication number s : 905/2018 Author: A and B Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 74 Country Azerbaijan Submission date 22 Dec 2018 Date of decision 27 Jul 2022 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/74/D/905/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3586/en-US
A v. New Zealand
A v. New Zealand CCPR/C/66/D/754/1997 Communication number s : 754/1997 Author: A Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 66 Country New Zealand Submission date 19 Apr 1996 Date of decision 15 Jul 1999 Comment: Individual opinion submitted by JUTBCCPR/C/66/D/754/1997https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/802/en-US
ADOPTED CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS: MONGOLIA
ADOPTED CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS: MONGOLIA CEDAW/C/MNG/CO/8 9 NULL 2016 03 10T00:00:00 CEDAW United Nations CEDAW/C/MNG/CO/8 9 Convention on the Elimination Distr.: General of All Forms of Discrimination 10 March 2016 against Women Original: English UHRICEDAW/C/MNG/CO/8-9https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/bae2a50c-8d7c-4b1e-beee-e65270d191f1
ALTUG TANER AKCAM v. Turkey
ALTUG TANER AKCAM v. Turkey TUR 25/01/2012 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:45:20 Case Description: These groups mainly concern unjustified and disproportionate interferences with the applicants freedom of expression on account of criminal proceedings for having EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37188
ANNUAL REPORT OF THE WORKING GROUP ON THE USE OF MERCENARIES AS A MEANS OF VIOLATING HUMAN RIGHTS AND IMPEDING THE EXERCISE OF THE RIGHT OF PEOPLES TO SELF-DETERMINATION ADDENDUM : MISSION TO HONDURAS
ANNUAL REPORT OF THE WORKING GROUP ON THE USE OF MERCENARIES AS A MEANS OF VIOLATING HUMAN RIGHTS AND IMPEDING THE EXERCISE OF THE RIGHT OF PEOPLES TO SELF DETERMINATION ADDENDUM : MISSION TO HONDURAS A/HRC/24/45/Add.1 NULL 2013 08 05T00:00:00 WG UHRIA/HRC/24/45/Add.1https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/3da0110e-6a50-4290-bd4f-20e5594b1e7b
ARMENIA: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
ARMENIA: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CAT/C/ARM/CO/4 NULL 2017 01 26T00:00:00 CAT United Nations CAT/C/ARM/CO/4 Convention against Torture Distr.: General 26 January 2017 and Other Cruel Inhuman or Degrading Treatment Original: English or Punishment Committee UHRICAT/C/ARM/CO/4https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/2c00e5eb-b65c-44c9-91b8-fda4bf8af126