Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 85
15. Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 15. Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities New York 13 December 2006 Entry into force : 3 May 2008 in accordance with article 45 1 . Registration : 3 May 2008 No. 44910 Status : UNIV-15https://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-15&chapter=4&clang=_en
A.H.G. v. Canada
A.H.G. v. Canada CCPR/C/113/D/2091/2011 Communication number s : 2091/2011 Author: A.H.G. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 113 Country Canada Submission date 28 Aug 2011 Date of decision 25 Mar 2015 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/113/D/2091/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1926/en-US
A.W.P v. Denmark
A.W.P v. Denmark CCPR/C/109/D/1879/2009 Communication number s : 1879/2009 Author: A.W.P Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 109 Country Denmark Submission date 26 Mar 2009 Date of decision 01 Nov 2013 Comment: The text of an individual JUTBCCPR/C/109/D/1879/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1678/en-US
Abbassi v. Algeria
Abbassi v. Algeria CCPR/C/89/D/1172/2003 Communication number s : 1172/2003 Author: Salim Abbassi Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 89 Country Algeria Submission date 31 Mar 2003 Date of decision 28 Mar 2007 Comment: Individual opinions JUTBCCPR/C/89/D/1172/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1354/en-US
Ahani v. Canada
Ahani v. Canada CCPR/C/80/D/1051/2002 Communication number s : 1051/2002 Author: Mansour Ahani Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 80 Country Canada Submission date 10 Jan 2002 Date of decision 29 Mar 2004 Comment: Three individual opinions JUTBCCPR/C/80/D/1051/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1108/en-US
Brun v. France
Brun v. France CCPR/C/88/D/1453/2006 Communication number s : 1453/2006 Author: Andr Brun Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 88 Country France Submission date 15 Nov 2005 Date of decision 18 Oct 2006 Comment: Pursuant to rule 90 of the JUTBCCPR/C/88/D/1453/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1319/en-US
CASE OF BIG BROTHER WATCH AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF BIG BROTHER WATCH AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 58170/13 62322/14 24960/15 CAREY D. CURLING R. NORTON E. GBR 9/13/2018 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Manifestly ill founded Violation of Article 8 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0913JUD005817013https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-186048
CASE OF BIG BROTHER WATCH AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF BIG BROTHER WATCH AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 58170/13 62322/14 24960/15 CAREY D. CURLING R. NORTON E. GBR 5/25/2021 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 34 Individual applications Art. 34 Victim Violation of Article 8 Right to ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0525JUD005817013https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-210077
CASE OF BOUYID v. BELGIUM
CASE OF BOUYID v. BELGIUM 23380/09 MARCHAND C CHIHAOUI Z. BEL 9/28/2015 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Degrading treatment Substantive aspect Violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Effective ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0928JUD002338009https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-157670
CASE OF CHIRAGOV AND OTHERS v. ARMENIA
CASE OF CHIRAGOV AND OTHERS v. ARMENIA 13216/05 MULLER M. VINE C. BUTLER M. IVERS M. POYNOR B. SWAROOP S. YILDIZ K. ARM 6/16/2015 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objections dismissed Article 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Article 35 3 Ratione loci ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0616JUD001321605https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-155353
CASE OF M.C. v. BULGARIA
CASE OF M.C. v. BULGARIA 39272/98 N/A BGR 12/4/2003 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 3 and 8 No separate issue under Art. 13 Not necessary to examine Art. 14 Non pecuniary damage financial award Costs and expenses partial award Convention proceedings ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:1204JUD003927298https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-61521
CASE OF MÜLLER AND OTHERS v. SWITZERLAND
CASE OF M LLER AND OTHERS v. SWITZERLAND 10737/84 N/A CHE 5/24/1988 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 10 Swiss Criminal Code Article 204 149 148 316 265 356 362 379 ECLI:CE:ECHR:1988:0524JUD001073784 COURT CHAMBER CASE OF M LLER AND OTHERS v. SWITZERLAND ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1988:0524JUD001073784https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57487
CASE OF M.M. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF M.M. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 24029/07 KENNEDY B. GBR 11/13/2012 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Article 35 1 Effective domestic remedy Violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 1 Respect for private ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1113JUD002402907https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-114517
CASE OF MAGYAR JETI ZRT v. HUNGARY
CASE OF MAGYAR JETI ZRT v. HUNGARY 11257/16 VERMEER V. HUN 12/4/2018 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 10 Freedom of expression general Article 10 1 Freedom of expression Pecuniary damage award Article 41 Pecuniary damage Just satisfaction 451 429 149 148 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1204JUD001125716https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-187930
CASE OF MOUVEMENT RAËLIEN SUISSE v. SWITZERLAND
CASE OF MOUVEMENT RA LIEN SUISSE v. SWITZERLAND 16354/06 ELKAIM E. CHE 7/13/2012 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Article 35 3 Manifestly ill founded No violation of Article 10 Freedom of expression General Article 10 1 Freedom of expression ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0713JUD001635406https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-112165
CASE OF MURŠIĆ v. CROATIA
CASE OF MUR I v. CROATIA 7334/13 VIDOVIC Z. HRV 10/20/2016 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Article 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Degrading treatment Substantive aspect No violation ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1020JUD000733413https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-167483
CASE OF McELHINNEY v. IRELAND
CASE OF McELHINNEY v. IRELAND 31253/96 IRL 11/21/2001 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 6 1 445 41 7 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:1121JUD003125396 CASE OF McELHINNEY v. IRELAND Application no. 31253/96 JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 21 November 2001 This judgment may be subject ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:1121JUD003125396https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-59887
CASE OF McGINLEY AND EGAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF McGINLEY AND EGAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 21825/93 23414/94 N/A GBR 6/9/1998 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection allowed non exhaustion of domestic remedies No violation of Art. 6 1 No violation of Art. 8 Not necessary to examine Art. 13 445 7 310 451 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0609JUD002182593https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58175
CASE OF NAÏT-LIMAN v. SWITZERLAND
CASE OF NA T LIMAN v. SWITZERLAND 51357/07 TRIAL INTERNATIONAL CHE 3/15/2018 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 6 Right to a fair trial Article 6 Civil proceedings Article 6 1 Access to court Article 41 of the Swiss Code of Obligations Section 3 of the ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0315JUD005135707https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-181789
CASE OF PAVLOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
CASE OF PAVLOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA 31612/09 SOMMER U. RUS 10/11/2022 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1011JUD003161209https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-219640