Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1641 - 1660 of 2276
Gavrilin v. Belarus
Gavrilin v. Belarus CCPR/C/89/D/1342/2005 Communication number s : 1342/2005 Author: Maksim Gavrilin Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 89 Country Belarus Submission date 28 Oct 2004 Date of decision 28 Mar 2007 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/89/D/1342/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1348/en-US
Gelazauskas v. Lithuania
Gelazauskas v. Lithuania CCPR/C/77/D/836/1998 Communication number s : 836/1998 Author: Kestutis Gelazauskas Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 77 Country Lithuania Submission date 14 Apr 1997 Date of decision 17 Mar 2003 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/77/D/836/1998https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1036/en-US
General Agreement on Privileges and Immunities of the Council of Europe (ETS No. 002)
General Agreement on Privileges and Immunities of the Council of Europe ETS No. 002 002 Paris 1949 09 02T00:00:00 Paris 1952 09 10T00:00:00 7 Ratifications. The Agreement concluded in accordance with the provisions of the Statute of the Council of Europe COEETS No. 002https://rm.coe.int/1680063729
Gombert v. France
Gombert v. France CCPR/C/77/D/987/2001 Communication number s : 987/2001 Author: Philippe Gombert Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 77 Country France Submission date 24 Sep 1999 Date of decision 18 Mar 2003 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/77/D/987/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1045/en-US
Government comments on the fourth report on Latvia
Government comments on the fourth report on Latvia LVA 2011 12 09 2012 02 21 Government comments on the report on LATVIA APPENDIX: GOVERNMENT S VIEWPOINT APPENDIXThe following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the ECRILVA-COM-IV-2012-003-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=LVA-COM-IV-2012-003-ENG
Government comments on the fourth report on Turkey
Government comments on the fourth report on Turkey TUR 2010 12 10 2011 02 08 Government comments on the report on TURKEY APPENDIX: GOVERNMENT S VIEWPOINT APPENDIXThe following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the ECRITUR-COM-IV-2011-005-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=TUR-COM-IV-2011-005-ENG
Government comments on the fourth report on the United Kingdom
Government comments on the fourth report on the United Kingdom GBR 2009 01 17 2010 03 02 Government comments on the report on THE UNITED KINGDOM APPENDIX: GOVERNMENT S VIEWPOINT APPENDIXThe following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and ECRIGBR-COM-IV-2010-004-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=GBR-COM-IV-2010-004-ENG
Government comments on the second report on Italy
Government comments on the second report on Italy ITA 2001 06 22 2002 04 23 The following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in Italy. APPENDIX ECRI wishes to point out that the analysis contained in its ECRIITA-COM-II-2002-004-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=ITA-COM-II-2002-004-ENG
Government comments on the third report on Denmark
Government comments on the third report on Denmark DNK 2005 12 16 2006 05 16 APPENDIX The following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in Denmark ECRI wishes to point out that the analysis contained in ECRIDNK-COM-III-2006-018-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=DNK-COM-III-2006-018-ENG
Government comments on the third report on Italy
Government comments on the third report on Italy ITA 2005 12 16 2006 05 16 APPENDIX The following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in Italy ECRI wishes to point out that the analysis contained in its ECRIITA-COM-III-2006-019-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=ITA-COM-III-2006-019-ENG
Government comments on the third report on Slovenia
Government comments on the third report on Slovenia SVN 2006 06 30 2007 02 13 APPENDIX The following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in Slovenia ECRI wishes to point out that the analysis contained in ECRISVN-COM-III-2007-005-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=SVN-COM-III-2007-005-ENG
Government comments on the third report on Sweden
Government comments on the third report on Sweden SWE 2004 12 17 2005 06 14 APPENDIX The following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in Sweden ECRI wishes to point out that the analysis contained in its ECRISWE-COM-III-2005-026-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=SWE-COM-III-2005-026-ENG
Government comments on the third report on the Russian Federation
Government comments on the third report on the Russian Federation RUS 2005 12 16 2006 05 16 APPENDIX The following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in the Russian Federation ECRI wishes to point out ECRIRUS-COM-III-2006-021-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=RUS-COM-III-2006-021-ENG
H.R.E.S. v. Switzerland
H.R.E.S. v. Switzerland CAT/C/64/D/783/2016 Communication number s : 783/2016 Author: H.R.E.S. represented by counsel Angela Stettler and Urs Ebn ther Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 64 Country Switzerland Submission date 15 Nov 2016 Date JUTBCAT/C/64/D/783/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2466/en-US
H.S. v. Australia
H.S. v. Australia CCPR/C/113/D/2015/2010 Communication number s : 2015/2010 Author: H.S. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 113 Country Australia Submission date 19 Feb 2010 Date of decision 30 Mar 2015 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/113/D/2015/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1925/en-US
HOLY SEE : CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
HOLY SEE : CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CAT/C/VAT/CO/1 NULL 2014 06 16T00:00:00 CAT United Nations CAT/C/VAT/CO/1 Convention against Torture Distr.: General 17 June 2014 and Other Cruel Inhuman or Degrading Treatment Original: English or Punishment Committee UHRICAT/C/VAT/CO/1https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/5021c659-b418-4bb4-bef6-f99ba3b6d06d
Hew Raymond Griffiths v. Australia
Hew Raymond Griffiths v. Australia CCPR/C/112/D/1973/2010 Communication number s : 1973/2010 Author: Hew Raymond Griffiths represented by counsels Joanna Mansfield and Nicolas Patrick Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 112 Country Australia JUTBCCPR/C/112/D/1973/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1893/en-US
Hincapié Dávila v. Colombia
Hincapi D vila v. Colombia CCPR/C/122/D/2490/2014 Communication number s : 2490/2014 Author: Vivian Maritza Hincapi D vila Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 122 Country Colombia Submission date 15 Nov 2013 Date of decision 06 Apr 2018 JUTBCCPR/C/122/D/2490/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3317/en-US
Horvath v. Australia
Horvath v. Australia CCPR/C/110/D/1885/2009 Communication number s : 1885/2009 Author: Corinna Horvath Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 110 Country Australia Submission date 19 Aug 2008 Date of decision 27 Mar 2014 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/110/D/1885/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1802/en-US
I.D.M. v. Colombia
I.D.M. v. Colombia CCPR/C/123/D/2414/2014 Communication number s : 2414/2014 Author: I.D.M. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 123 Country Colombia Submission date 14 May 2013 Date of decision 25 Jul 2018 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/123/D/2414/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2500/en-US