Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1681 - 1700 of 1849
KOCH v. Germany
KOCH v. Germany DEU 17/12/2012 00:00:00 15/11/2016 14:24:56 Case Description: Protection of private life: Procedural violation due to domestic courts refusal to examine the merits the applicant s motion to declare unlawful the rejection by the Federal EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-38218
Kell v. Canada
Kell v. Canada CEDAW/C/51/D/19/2008 Communication number s : 019/2008 Author: Cecilia Kell Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 51 Country Canada Submission date 24 Jun 2008 Date of decision 28 Feb 2012 Comment: The text of one individual JUTBCEDAW/C/51/D/19/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1718/en-US
L.G. v. Republic of Korea
L.G. v. Republic of Korea CERD/C/86/D/51/2012 Communication number s : 51/2012 Author: L.G. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 86 Country Republic of Korea Submission date 12 Dec 2012 Date of decision 01 May 2015 Comment: This document has no JUTBCERD/C/86/D/51/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3019/en-US
L. J. R. v. Australia
L. J. R. v. Australia CAT/C/41/D/316/2007 Communication number s : 316/2007 Author: L. J. R. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 41 Country Australia Submission date 05 Apr 2007 Date of decision 10 Nov 2008 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/41/D/316/2007https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/75/en-US
L.M. v. Canada
L.M. v. Canada CAT/C/63/D/488/2012 Communication number s : 488/2012 Author: L.M. represented by counsel Johanne Doyon and Philippe Larochelle Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 63 Country Canada Submission date 10 Jan 2012 Date of decision JUTBCAT/C/63/D/488/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2735/en-US
Laaroussi v. Morocco
Laaroussi v. Morocco CAT/C/74/D/891/2018 Communication number s : 891/2018 Author: Abdel Jalil Laaroussi Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 74 Country Morocco Submission date 19 Oct 2018 Date of decision 15 Jul 2022 Comment: This document has JUTBCAT/C/74/D/891/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3615/en-US
Loor Chila v. Spain
Loor Chila v. Spain E/C.12/70/D/102/2019 Communication number s : 102/2019 Author: Gladis Patricia Loor Chila Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 70 To be confirmed Country Spain Submission date Date of decision 12 Oct 2021 Comment: This JUTBE/C.12/70/D/102/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2972/en-US
M.C. v. Guinea,Netherlands
M.C. v. Guinea Netherlands CAT/C/56/D/569/2013 Communication number s : 569/2013 Author: M.C. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 56 Country Guinea Netherlands Submission date 17 Jun 2013 Date of decision 13 Nov 2015 Comment: This document has JUTBCAT/C/56/D/569/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2247/en-US
M. G. C. v. Romania
M. G. C. v. Romania ROU 15/06/2016 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: Judgments: M.G.C. v. Romania No. 61495/11 final on 15/06/2016 I.C. v. Romania No. 36934/08 final on 24/08/2016 These cases concern breaches of the State s positive EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13219
M.I. v. Sweden
M.I. v. Sweden CCPR/C/130/D/3246/2018 Communication number s : 3246/2018 Author: M.I. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 130 Country Sweden Submission date 18 Sep 2018 Date of decision 06 Nov 2020 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/130/D/3246/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3253/en-US
M v. Ukraine
M v. Ukraine UKR 19/07/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: These cases concern a lack of proper and fair procedure for authorisation of admission and subsequent retention in the course of civil involuntary hospitalisation between 2000 and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31581
MILADINOV AND OTHERS v. "THE FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA"
MILADINOV AND OTHERS v. THE FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA 46398/09 50570/09 50576/09 GODZO D. GODZO A. MKD 4/24/2014 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 5 Right to liberty and security Article 5 3 Reasonableness of pre trial detention Violation of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0424JUD004639809https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-142521
MURADYAN v. Armenia
MURADYAN v. Armenia ARM 24/02/2017 00:00:00 24/03/2017 11:39:16 Case Description: These cases concern the authorities failure to comply with their positive obligation to protect the applicants sons right to life during their military service as well as EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46287
Mayantie Jasmina Soumahoro v. Netherlands
Mayantie Jasmina Soumahoro v. Netherlands CAT/C/66/D/757/2016 Communication number s : 757/2016 Author: Mayantie Jasmina Soumahoro represented by counsel G.I.Dijkman Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 66 Country Netherlands Submission date 10 JUTBCAT/C/66/D/757/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2575/en-US
N.K. v. Netherlands
N.K. v. Netherlands CCPR/C/120/D/2326/2013 Communication number s : 2326/2013 Author: N.K. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 120 Country Netherlands Submission date 10 Dec 2013 Date of decision 18 Jul 2017 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/120/D/2326/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3103/en-US
N.K. v. Netherlands
N.K. v. Netherlands CCPR/C/120/D/2326/2013/REV.1 Communication number s : 2326/2013 Author: N.K. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 120 Country Netherlands Submission date 10 Dec 2013 Date of decision 18 Jul 2017 Comment: Annex: Individual JUTBCCPR/C/120/D/2326/2013/REV.1https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2317/en-US
N.S. v. Russian Federation
N.S. v. Russian Federation CCPR/C/113/D/2192/2012 Communication number s : 2192/2012 Author: N.S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 113 Country Russian Federation Submission date 21 Aug 2012 Date of decision 27 Mar 2015 Comment: Violation of JUTBCCPR/C/113/D/2192/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3089/en-US
N. v. Finland
N. v. Finland FIN 30/11/2005 00:00:00 28/10/2016 09:14:44 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment deportation/asylum: Risk of ill treatment in case of enforcement of the order to deport the applicant to the Republic of Congo despite his having EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4920
NASR AND GHALI v. Italy
NASR AND GHALI v. Italy ITA 23/05/2016 00:00:00 30/01/2018 12:28:48 Case Description: The case concerns violations arising from an extraordinary rendition operation against the first applicant an Egyptian cleric suspected of terrorism related offences EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28282
NEDIM SENER v. Turkey
NEDIM SENER v. Turkey TUR 08/10/2014 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:04:14 Case Description: These groups mainly concern unjustified and disproportionate interferences with the applicants freedom of expression on account of criminal proceedings for having EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37296