Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 61 - 80 of 3412
BOCU v. Romania
BOCU v. Romania ROU 30/09/2020 00:00:00 15/10/2020 16:39:02 Case Description: This case concerns the failure of the domestic courts to protect the applicant s family life as a result of their refusal in 2013 to revise a judgment establishing his paternity EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56067
BOULTIF v. Switzerland
BOULTIF v. Switzerland CHE 02/11/2001 00:00:00 27/10/2016 18:58:12 Case Description: Protection of family life: Disproportionate interference due to the non renewal of a foreigner s residence permit following his criminal conviction resulting in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4702
BOUSARRA v. France
BOUSARRA v. France FRA 23/12/2010 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:14:44 Case Description: Protection of family life: Disproportionate interference due to expulsion of a Moroccan national on grounds of public order. Article 8 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33069
BOWMAN v. the United Kingdom
BOWMAN v. the United Kingdom GBR 19/02/1998 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to the applicant s prosecution for having distributed leaflets indicating that certain political candidates EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2434
BREZEC v. Croatia
BREZEC v. Croatia HRV 18/10/2013 00:00:00 03/11/2016 15:28:29 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Disproportionate interference into the applicant s right to a home due to domestic courts decisions ordering to vacate flats owned by EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12045
BRISC v. Romania
BRISC v. Romania ROU 11/03/2019 00:00:00 03/04/2019 15:10:37 Case Description: The case concerns the applicant s reprimand and consequent removal from the office of chief prosecutor in 2009 as a result of a disciplinary action instituted him on charges EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-51829
BRONIOWSKI v. Poland
BRONIOWSKI v. Poland POL 22/06/2004 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:13:46 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference due to the absence of an effective mechanism to enforce the applicant s right to compensation reaffirmed in the Land EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17801
BRUNET v. France
BRUNET v. France FRA 18/12/2014 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:16:33 Case Description: Protection of private life: Disproportionate interference due to the lack of a real possibility for seeking deletion of information recorded in a crime database despite the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-30069
BRZEZINSKI v. Poland
BRZEZINSKI v. Poland POL 25/07/2019 00:00:00 23/08/2019 14:58:08 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to a domestic court s decision to order the context of a municipal elections campaign the publication of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52633
BUZESCU v. Romania
BUZESCU v. Romania ROU 24/08/2005 00:00:00 06/11/2016 15:17:22 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and protection of property: Unfair proceedings initiated by a lawyer against the Lawyers Union s annulment of the Bar EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-16149
Benon Pjetri v. Switzerland
Benon Pjetri v. Switzerland CERD/C/91/D/53/2013 Communication number s : 053/2013 Author: Benon Pjetri Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 91 Country Switzerland Submission date 12 Dec 2012 Date of decision 05 Dec 2016 Comment: Opinion non JUTBCERD/C/91/D/53/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2186/en-US
Bronson Blessington and Matthew Elliot v. Australia
Bronson Blessington and Matthew Elliot v. Australia CCPR/C/112/D/1968/2010 Communication number s : 1968/2010 Author: Bronson Blessington and Matthew Elliot represented by Human Rights Law Centre Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 112 Country JUTBCCPR/C/112/D/1968/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1890/en-US
Byahuranga v. Denmark
Byahuranga v. Denmark CCPR/C/82/D/1222/2003 Communication number s : 1222/2003 Author: Jonny Rubin Byahuranga Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 82 Country Denmark Submission date 15 Aug 2003 Date of decision 01 Nov 2004 Comment: The JUTBCCPR/C/82/D/1222/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1148/en-US
C. C. v. Spain
C. C. v. Spain ESP 06/01/2010 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:12:44 Case Description: Disproportionate interference with private life: Disclosure of the applicant s identity and health state in a judgment delivered in civil proceedings between him and his EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3531
C.N. v. Burundi
C.N. v. Burundi CAT/C/60/D/579/2013 Communication number s : 579/2013 Author: G.N. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 60 Country Burundi Submission date 11 Dec 2013 Date of decision 01 May 2017 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/60/D/579/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3016/en-US
C. v. Australia
C. v. Australia CCPR/C/76/D/900/1999 Communication number s : 900/1999 Author: C. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 76 Country Australia Submission date 23 Nov 1999 Date of decision 28 Oct 2002 Comment: Under rule 85 of the Committee s rules JUTBCCPR/C/76/D/900/1999https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1026/en-US
C v. Australia
C v. Australia CCPR/C/119/D/2216/2012 Communication number s : 2216/2012 Author: C Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 119 Country Australia Submission date 27 Apr 2012 Date of decision 28 Mar 2017 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/119/D/2216/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2375/en-US
C. v. Croatia
C. v. Croatia HRV 08/01/2021 00:00:00 29/01/2021 19:13:35 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Disproportionate interference on account of a minor s flawed representation and failure to hear his views in custody proceedings. Article 8 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56653
CALDARELLA v. Italy
CALDARELLA v. Italy ITA 22/01/2013 00:00:00 28/11/2016 10:48:54 Case Description: Disproportionate interference with private life: due to the application of limitations to the applicant s personal capacity deriving from his being registered as bankrupt EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-43275
CALIN v. Romania
CALIN v. Romania ROU 05/07/2022 00:00:00 21/07/2022 09:43:28 Case Description: In C lin the police seized in April 2003 the applicant s apartment cars property documents and money in the context of a criminal investigation against him for unlawfully EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-60779