Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 6281 - 6300 of 6449
Sylvie Bakatu-Bia v. Sweden
Sylvie Bakatu Bia v. Sweden CAT/C/46/D/379/2009 Communication number s : 379/2009 Author: Sylvie Bakatu Bia Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 46 Country Sweden Submission date 26 Mar 2009 Date of decision 03 Jun 2011 Comment: This document JUTBCAT/C/46/D/379/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1792/en-US
T. A. v. Sweden
T. A. v. Sweden CAT/C/39/D/303/2006 Communication number s : 303/2006 Author: T. A. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 39 Country Sweden Submission date 15 Sep 2006 Date of decision 22 Nov 2007 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/39/D/303/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/88/en-US
T.A. v. Switzerland
T.A. v. Switzerland CAT/C/73/D/914/2019 Communication number s : 914/2019 Author: T.A. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 73 Country Switzerland Submission date 13 Feb 2019 Date of decision 28 Apr 2022 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/73/D/914/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3052/en-US
T.M. AND C.M. v. the Republic of Moldova
T.M. AND C.M. v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 28/04/2014 00:00:00 04/11/2016 14:25:58 Case Description: This group of cases mainly concerns the authorities failure to comply with their positive obligations under Article 3 on account of the manner of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14229
T.M. v. Sweden
T.M. v. Sweden CAT/C/68/D/860/2018 Communication number s : 860/2018 Author: T.M. represented by counsel Daniel Carnestedt Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 68 Country Sweden Submission date 21 Jan 2018 Date of decision 06 Dec 2019 Comment: JUTBCAT/C/68/D/860/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2702/en-US
T.P.F. v. Peru
T.P.F. v. Peru CEDAW/C/50/D/22/2009 Communication number s : 022/2009 Author: T.P.F. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 50 Country Peru Submission date 18 Jun 2009 Date of decision 17 Oct 2011 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/50/D/22/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1704/en-US
T v. Australia
T v. Australia CAT/C/58/D/599/2014 Communication number s : 599/2014 Author: T Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 58 Country Australia Submission date 30 Apr 2014 Date of decision 03 Aug 2016 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCAT/C/58/D/599/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3011/en-US
T. v. the Czech Republic
T. v. the Czech Republic CZE 17/10/2014 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:27:14 Case Description: Protection of family life: Authorities failure to ensure the maintenance of family ties between a father and his daughter who was placed in care following the death of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6372
TALPIS v. Italy
TALPIS v. Italy ITA 18/09/2017 00:00:00 03/10/2017 09:13:29 Case Description: This group of cases notably concerns violations of Articles 2 and 3 of the Convention because of the inertia of the authorities in handling the applicants complaints of domestic EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47825
TAPAYEVA AND OTHERS v. Russia
TAPAYEVA AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 23/02/2022 00:00:00 17/03/2022 16:35:22 Case Description: This case concerns the violation of the applicants right to family life on account of the authorities failure to enforce a domestic judgment ordering that the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-59929
TAVLI v. Turkey
TAVLI v. Turkey TUR 09/02/2007 00:00:00 28/10/2016 15:13:12 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Impossibility for the applicant to prevail himself before the national courts of DNA tests proving that he was not the father of his EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5574
TERNA v. Italy
TERNA v. Italy ITA 14/04/2021 00:00:00 30/04/2021 16:08:47 Case Description: The Terna group of cases concerns the authorities failure to make adequate and sufficient efforts to ensure respect of the applicants visiting rights under the conditions set by EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57509
TODOROVA v. Italy
TODOROVA v. Italy ITA 13/04/2009 00:00:00 28/11/2016 10:46:44 Case Description: Protection of family life: Authorities failure to ensure that the applicant s consent to giving up her children had been given in full knowledge of its implications and had EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-44575
TOMOV AND OTHERS v. Russia
TOMOV AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 09/07/2019 00:00:00 25/07/2019 15:06:12 Case Description: These cases concern a structural problem highlighted by the European Court applying the pilot judgment procedure of inhuman and degrading treatment caused by the poor EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52617
TONELLO v. Hungary
TONELLO v. Hungary HUN 24/04/2018 00:00:00 18/05/2018 11:04:24 Case Description: The Shaw group concerns violations of the applicants right to respect for their family life on account of the authorities failure to effectively address the issues arising EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49455
TROSIN v. Ukraine
TROSIN v. Ukraine UKR 23/05/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: Protection of private and family life / discrimination / cooperation with ECtHR: Disproportionate interference due to restrictions of family visits in prison as regards their EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31624
TSIKAKIS v. Germany
TSIKAKIS v. Germany DEU 10/05/2011 00:00:00 15/11/2016 14:32:10 Case Description: Protection of family life and excessive length of related proceedings: Domestic courts failure to take effective measures such as a coercive fine against the mother to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-38558
TSOURLAKIS v. Greece
TSOURLAKIS v. Greece GRC 01/03/2010 00:00:00 07/11/2016 09:36:22 Case Description: Lacking protection of private and family life: lack of access to a welfare report on the applicant s child s life conditions prepared by the Athens Child Welfare Society EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-22496
TSVETELIN PETKOV v. Bulgaria
TSVETELIN PETKOV v. Bulgaria BGR 15/10/2014 00:00:00 26/10/2016 15:12:04 Case Description: Protection of family life: Disproportionate interference due to the failure to properly summon the applicant in judicial paternity proceedings to a hearing in which EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1923
TUNIKOVA AND OTHERS v. Russia
TUNIKOVA AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 14/03/2022 00:00:00 31/03/2022 18:11:41 Case Description: The applicant women in this group of cases were victims of different forms of domestic violence from their male partners/ex partners including repeated assaults EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-60049