Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 3144
11. b Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the involvement of children in armed conflict
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 11. b Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the involvement of children in armed conflict New York 25 May 2000 Entry into force : 12 February 2002 in accordance UNIV-11-bhttps://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-11-b&chapter=4&clang=_en
A.B. and B.D. v. Poland
A.B. and B.D. v. Poland CCPR/C/135/D/3017/2017 Communication number s : 3017/2017 Author: A.B. and B.D. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 135 Country Poland Submission date 24 Aug 2017 Date of decision 21 Jul 2022 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/135/D/3017/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3673/en-US
A.B. v. the Netherlands
A.B. v. the Netherlands NLD 29/04/2002 00:00:00 27/10/2016 17:05:40 Case Description: Protection of correspondence: Unjustified interference due to the control of a detainee s correspondence with the European Commission of Human Rights by prison EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4373
A.M.M. v. Switzerland
A.M.M. v. Switzerland CERD/C/84/D/50/2012 Communication number s : 050/2012 Author: A.M.M. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 84 Country Switzerland Submission date 08 Jan 2012 Date of decision 18 Feb 2014 Comment: This document has no JUTBCERD/C/84/D/50/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1799/en-US
A.M. v. Democratic Republic of the Congo,France
A.M. v. Democratic Republic of the Congo France CAT/C/44/D/302/2006 Communication number s : 302/2006 Author: A.M. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 44 Country Democratic Republic of the Congo France Submission date 25 Sep 2006 Date of JUTBCAT/C/44/D/302/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/72/en-US
AL NASHIRI v. Romania
AL NASHIRI v. Romania ROU 08/10/2018 00:00:00 10/12/2018 09:38:46 Case Description: The case concerns violations of a number of Convention rights arising from the fact that the applicant was the victim of an extraordinary rendition operation. The European EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50873
ALPARSLAN ALTAN v. Turkey
ALPARSLAN ALTAN v. Turkey TUR 09/09/2019 00:00:00 25/09/2019 10:40:24 Case Description: The Alparslan Altan group of cases concerns violations of the right to liberty and security in the immediate aftermath of the coup attempt on 15 July 2016 due to the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52779
ARSKAYA v. Ukraine
ARSKAYA v. Ukraine UKR 05/03/2014 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: The present group of cases concerns principally the failure of the domestic authorities to carry out effective investigations into allegations of medical negligence by EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31636
Ali v. Tunisia
Ali v. Tunisia CAT/C/41/D/291/2006 Communication number s : 291/2006 Author: Saadia Ali Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 41 Country Tunisia Submission date 02 Mar 2006 Date of decision 21 Nov 2008 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/41/D/291/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/71/en-US
Amanda Jane Mellet v. Ireland
Amanda Jane Mellet v. Ireland CCPR/C/116/D/2324/2013 Communication number s : 2324/2013 Author: Amanda Jane Mellet Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 116 Country Ireland Submission date 11 Nov 2013 Date of decision 31 Mar 2016 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/116/D/2324/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2152/en-US
BAKA v. Hungary
BAKA v. Hungary HUN 23/06/2016 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:32:51 Case Description: The European Court found violations of the Convention on account of the undue and premature termination of the applicants mandates as President Baka case and Vice President Erm EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10859
BANNIKOV v. Latvia
BANNIKOV v. Latvia LVA 11/09/2013 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:49 Case Description: Excessive length of pre trial detention: lack of sufficient grounds to justify the applicant s continued detention. Status of Execution: On 1 October 2005 the provisions of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31106
BARBORSKI v. Bulgaria
BARBORSKI v. Bulgaria BGR 26/06/2013 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Unlawful detention of the applicant due to the lack of clarity in the regulations governing situations in which different types of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3896
BARBU ANGHELESCU v. Romania (no 1)
BARBU ANGHELESCU v. Romania no 1 ROU 05/01/2005 00:00:00 06/11/2016 16:19:47 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment: Abuse suffered by the applicants or their relatives in police custody or upon arrest ineffectiveness of related criminal EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17496
BERARU v. Romania
BERARU v. Romania ROU 08/09/2014 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: The case concerns a breach of the applicant s right to a fair trial due to an irregularity in the composition of the panel of the first instance court the limited access of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13312
BOYKO v. Russia
BOYKO v. Russia RUS 20/02/2018 00:00:00 09/03/2018 16:28:42 Case Description: Violation of the right to freedom of religion because during the applicant s detention on remand in Moscow in 2007 and 2008 the investigator refused him to see priests Article 9 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49083
BRACCI v. Italy
BRACCI v. Italy ITA 15/02/2006 00:00:00 10/11/2016 09:49:20 Case Description: Unfairness of criminal proceedings: convictions based to a decisive extent on statements by witnesses collected during the investigation without the applicants having had the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-36550
BUCUR AND TOMA v. Romania
BUCUR AND TOMA v. Romania ROU 08/04/2013 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: This case concerns the disclosure by the first applicant a military official in the Romanian Intelligence Service SRI of information on wide scale illegal telephone EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12840
BURMYCH AND OTHERS v. Ukraine
BURMYCH AND OTHERS v. Ukraine UKR 12/10/2017 00:00:00 19/10/2017 17:05:32 Case Description: These cases relate to the major structural problem of non enforcement or delayed enforcement of domestic judicial decisions concerning both pecuniary and non EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47973
Baban v. Australia
Baban v. Australia CCPR/C/78/D/1014/2001 Communication number s : 1014/2001 Author: Omar Sharif Baban Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 78 Country Australia Submission date 19 Dec 2000 Date of decision 06 Aug 2003 Comment: Under rule 86 of JUTBCCPR/C/78/D/1014/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1057/en-US