Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 3743
A.R. v. Netherlands
A.R. v. Netherlands CAT/C/31/D/203/2002 Communication number s : 203/2002 Author: A.R. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 31 Country Netherlands Submission date 14 Mar 2002 Date of decision 14 Nov 2003 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/31/D/203/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/159/en-US
A.Y. v. Switzerland
A.Y. v. Switzerland CAT/C/74/D/887/2018 Communication number s : 887/2018 Author: A.Y. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 74 Country Switzerland Submission date 11 Oct 2018 Date of decision 22 Jul 2022 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/74/D/887/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3620/en-US
A.Y. v. Switzerland
A.Y. v. Switzerland CAT/C/74/D/887/2018 Communication number s : 887/2018 Author: A.Y. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 74 Country Switzerland Submission date 11 Oct 2018 Date of decision 22 Jul 2022 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/74/D/887/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3614/en-US
ABDOLKHANI AND KARIMNIA v. Turkey
ABDOLKHANI AND KARIMNIA v. Turkey TUR 01/03/2010 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:53:30 Case Description: Right to liberty and security / deportation and extradition protection against ill treatment / conditions of detention: absence of clear legal provisions EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37254
ADEM SERKAN GUNDOGDU v. Turkey
ADEM SERKAN GUNDOGDU v. Turkey TUR 16/04/2018 00:00:00 18/05/2018 11:04:24 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Failure to provide the accused applicant a copy of the public prosecutor s opinion on his continued pre trial detention. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49405
AERTS v. Belgium
AERTS v. Belgium BEL 30/07/1998 00:00:00 25/10/2016 14:46:28 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention / access to and effective functioning of justice: Lawfulness of the applicant s detention in a psychiatric wing of a prison pending his EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1369
ALEKSEYEV v. Russia
ALEKSEYEV v. Russia RUS 11/04/2011 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: The group of cases Alekseyev concerns the disproportionate interference with the applicants right to freedom of assembly due to the repeated bans on the holding of gay EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14136
ALPARSLAN ALTAN v. Turkey
ALPARSLAN ALTAN v. Turkey TUR 09/09/2019 00:00:00 25/09/2019 10:40:24 Case Description: The Alparslan Altan group of cases concerns violations of the right to liberty and security in the immediate aftermath of the coup attempt on 15 July 2016 due to the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52779
ASSENOV AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria
ASSENOV AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria BGR 28/10/1998 00:00:00 04/11/2016 14:40:21 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention protection against detention lack of a remedy: Lack of judicial review of the decision to detain the applicant on remand and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14265
Agiza v. Sweden
Agiza v. Sweden CAT/C/34/D/233/2003 Communication number s : 233/2003 Author: Ahmed Hussein Mustafa Kamil Agiza Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 34 Country Sweden Submission date 25 Jun 2003 Date of decision 20 May 2005 Comment: Decision on JUTBCAT/C/34/D/233/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/140/en-US
Alakuş v. Türkiye
Alaku v. T rkiye CCPR/C/135/D/3736/2020 Communication number s : 3736/2020 Author: Mukadder Alaku Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 135 Country T rkiye Submission date 23 Dec 2019 Date of decision 26 Jul 2022 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/135/D/3736/2020https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3737/en-US
B.H. v. Austria
B.H. v. Austria CCPR/C/119/D/2088/2011 Communication number s : 2088/2011 Author: B.H. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 119 Country Austria Submission date 14 Feb 2005 Date of decision 28 Mar 2017 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/119/D/2088/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2257/en-US
BASU v. Germany
BASU v. Germany DEU 18/01/2023 00:00:00 03/02/2023 17:20:59 Case Description: This case concerns the authorities failure to ascertain through an independent body that an effective investigation is carried out by the State authorities into the applicant s EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-62530
BATALINY v. Russia
BATALINY v. Russia RUS 14/12/2015 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This case concerns the inhuman and degrading treatment of the first applicant on account of his forced psychiatric treatment in the absence of an established medical need EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13974
BAYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia
BAYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 13/11/2017 00:00:00 28/11/2017 10:01:20 Case Description: The case of Alekseyev concerns the disproportionate interference with the applicant s right to freedom of assembly due to the repeated bans over a period of three EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-48317
BAYRAM v. Turkey
BAYRAM v. Turkey TUR 24/11/2020 00:00:00 19/01/2021 08:26:12 Case Description: The case concerns the violation of the right to liberty and security on account of the inability of the applicant to access the investigation file in the context of review EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56553
BERDZENISHVILI AND OTHERS v. Russia
BERDZENISHVILI AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 20/03/2017 00:00:00 06/04/2017 15:55:09 Case Description: These cases concern the arbitrary arrest detention and collective expulsion from the Russian Federation of Georgian nationals in autumn 2006. In EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46587
BOLAT v. Russia
BOLAT v. Russia RUS 05/01/2007 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: The case concerns two violations of the Convention relating to unlawful actions by executive authorities: The first violation relates to the freedom of movement of the applicant EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13741
BTS HOLDING, A.S. v. Slovakia
BTS HOLDING A.S. v. Slovakia SVK 30/09/2022 00:00:00 20/01/2023 18:00:32 Case Description: The case concerns the unjustified refusal of the domestic courts to allow enforcement of a final and binding international arbitration award made by the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-62398
Baban v. Australia
Baban v. Australia CCPR/C/78/D/1014/2001 Communication number s : 1014/2001 Author: Omar Sharif Baban Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 78 Country Australia Submission date 19 Dec 2000 Date of decision 06 Aug 2003 Comment: Under rule 86 of JUTBCCPR/C/78/D/1014/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1057/en-US