Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 31
Aden et al. v. Denmark
Aden et al. v. Denmark CCPR/C/126/D/2531/2015 Communication number s : 2531/2015 Author: Nimo Mohamed Aden and Liban Muhammed Hassan Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 126 Country Denmark Submission date 15 Sep 2014 Date of decision 25 Jul JUTBCCPR/C/126/D/2531/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2791/en-US
Alzery v. Sweden
Alzery v. Sweden CCPR/C/88/D/1416/2005 Communication number s : 1416/2005 Author: Mohammed Alzery Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 88 Country Sweden Submission date 29 Jul 2005 Date of decision 25 Oct 2006 Comment: Pursuant to rule 90 of JUTBCCPR/C/88/D/1416/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1300/en-US
CASE OF BABAR AHMAD AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF BABAR AHMAD AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 24027/07 11949/08 36742/08 66911/09 67354/09 PEIRCE G. COOPER B. ARANI M. JONES A. BRANDON B. RAJA A. JONES J. GBR 4/10/2012 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0410JUD002402707https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-110267
CASE OF CARSON AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF CARSON AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 42184/05 OTTY T. OLBOURNE B. TUNLEY M. P. GRAY H. GBR 3/16/2010 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed non exhaustion of domestic remedies Preliminary objection allowed non exhaustion of domestic ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0316JUD004218405https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-97704
CASE OF CARSON AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF CARSON AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 42184/05 OTTY T. OLBOURNE B. GBR 11/4/2008 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible No violation of Art. 14 P1 1 238 343 100 258 369 311 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1104JUD004218405 FOURTH SECTION CASE OF CARSON AND OTHERS ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1104JUD004218405https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-89309
CASE OF GEORGIA v. RUSSIA (II)
CASE OF GEORGIA v. RUSSIA II 38263/08 RUS 1/21/2021 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objections dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Ratione loci ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0121JUD003826308https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-207757
CASE OF MONT BLANC TRADING LTD AND ANTARES TITANIUM TRADING LTD v. UKRAINE
CASE OF MONT BLANC TRADING LTD AND ANTARES TITANIUM TRADING LTD v. UKRAINE 11161/08 LANDOLT P. UKR 1/14/2021 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 6 Right to a fair trial Article 6 Civil proceedings Article 6 1 Fair hearing Equality of arms Violation of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0114JUD001116108https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-207406
CASE OF PELLADOAH v. THE NETHERLANDS
CASE OF PELLADOAH v. THE NETHERLANDS 16737/90 N/A NLD 9/22/1994 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 6 1 6 3 c Not necessary to examine Art. 6 2 Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Code of Criminal Procedure Articles 270 339 348 399 403 500h 445 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:0922JUD001673790https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57902
CASE OF SUKHOVETSKYY v. UKRAINE
CASE OF SUKHOVETSKYY v. UKRAINE 13716/02 N/A UKR 3/28/2006 12:00:00 AM No violation of P1 3 Not necessary to examine under Art. 14 P1 3 Article 43 of the Law on Parliamentary Elections 2001 Article 24 of the Constitution 343 100 353 574 476 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0328JUD001371602https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-72893
CASE OF T. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF T. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 24724/94 N/A GBR 12/16/1999 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Article 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Degrading treatment Inhuman treatment ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:1216JUD002472494https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58593
CASE OF V. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF V. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 24888/94 N/A GBR 12/16/1999 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Article 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Degrading treatment Inhuman treatment ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:1216JUD002488894https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58594
CASE OF VALIULIENĖ v. LITHUANIA
CASE OF VALIULIEN v. LITHUANIA 33234/07 MICKEVICIUS H. LTU 3/26/2013 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Positive obligations Substantive aspect Non pecuniary damage award Article 116 of the old Criminal Code Article 140 1 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0326JUD003323407https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-117636
CASE OF VINTER AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF VINTER AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 66069/09 130/10 3896/10 CREIGHTON S. WEATHERBY P. VAN ZYL SMIT D. WOODS B. HORWELL R. HINDMARSH L. CHIVERS SOLICITORS BINGLEY McKONE M. GBR 7/9/2013 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0709JUD006606909https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-122664
Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (ETS No. 005)
Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms ETS No. 005 005 Rome 1950 11 04T00:00:00 Treaty open for signature by the member States of the Council of Europe and for accession by the European Union Rome 1953 09 03T00:00:00 10 COEETS No. 005https://rm.coe.int/1680a2353d
Dayras et al. v. France
Dayras et al. v. France CEDAW/C/44/D/13/2007 Communication number s : 013/2007 Author: Mich le Dayras Nelly Campo Trumel Sylvie Delange Fr d rique Remy Cremieu Micheline Zeghouani H l ne Muzard Fekkar and Ad le Daufrene Levrard Type of decision: JUTBCEDAW/C/44/D/13/2007https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1712/en-US
Dranichnikov v. Australia
Dranichnikov v. Australia CCPR/C/88/D/1291/2004 Communication number s : 1291/2004 Author: Olga Dranichnikov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 88 Country Australia Submission date 01 Jun 2004 Date of decision 20 Oct 2006 Comment: Pursuant to JUTBCCPR/C/88/D/1291/2004https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1327/en-US
G. K. v. Netherlands
G. K. v. Netherlands CCPR/C/104/D/1801/2008 Communication number s : 1801/2008 Author: G. K. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 104 Country Netherlands Submission date 30 Jul 2008 Date of decision 22 Mar 2012 Comment: Pursuant to rule 90 of JUTBCCPR/C/104/D/1801/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1660/en-US
G. v. Australia
G. v. Australia CCPR/C/119/D/2172/2012 Communication number s : 2172/2012 Author: G. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 119 Country Australia Submission date 02 Dec 2011 Date of decision 17 Mar 2017 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/119/D/2172/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2220/en-US
Jazairi v. Canada
Jazairi v. Canada CCPR/C/82/D/958/2000 Communication number s : 958/2000 Author: Nuri Jazairi Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 82 Country Canada Submission date 10 Aug 2000 Date of decision 26 Oct 2004 Comment: Under Rule 90 of the JUTBCCPR/C/82/D/958/2000https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1140/en-US
Kibale v. Canada
Kibale v. Canada CCPR/C/93/D/1562/2007 Communication number s : 1562/2007 Author: Guillaume Kibale Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 93 Country Canada Submission date 23 Aug 2005 Date of decision 22 Jul 2008 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/93/D/1562/2007https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1480/en-US