Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 3276
11. b Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the involvement of children in armed conflict
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 11. b Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the involvement of children in armed conflict New York 25 May 2000 Entry into force : 12 February 2002 in accordance UNIV-11-bhttps://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-11-b&chapter=4&clang=_en
3rd General Report on GREVIO’s activities
3rd General Report on GREVIO s activities 2022 06 14 2022 06 14 cyclePhraseHere Publication date: 14/06/2022 3rd GENERAL REPORT ON GREVIO S ACTIVITIES GREVIO Group of Experts on Action against Violence against Women and Domestic Violence covering the GREVIO3rd_General_Report_ENG_HUDOChttps://hudoc.grevio.coe.int/eng?i=3rd_General_Report_ENG_HUDOC
A.W.K. v. New Zealand
A.W.K. v. New Zealand CCPR/C/112/D/1998/2010 Communication number s : 1998/2010 Author: A.W.K. represented by counsel Frank Deliu Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 112 Country New Zealand Submission date 02 Aug 2010 Date of decision 28 JUTBCCPR/C/112/D/1998/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1896/en-US
ABRAMOVA v. Ukraine
ABRAMOVA v. Ukraine UKR 18/12/2018 00:00:00 07/01/2019 11:55:18 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of access to a court due to the courts failure to examine the applicant s defamation claim against the prosecutor s EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-51049
AFANASYEV v. Ukraine
AFANASYEV v. Ukraine UKR 05/07/2005 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: These cases concern physical or psychological torture and/or ill treatment by the police mostly in order to obtain confessions substantive violations of Article 3 lack of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31348
AGROKOMPLEKS v. Ukraine
AGROKOMPLEKS v. Ukraine UKR 08/03/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Unfair insolvency proceedings against an oil refinery in which the State was a major shareholder due to the lack of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31565
AKOPYAN v. Ukraine
AKOPYAN v. Ukraine UKR 05/09/2014 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention and of family life: Unlawful and lengthy involuntary confinement in a psychiatric hospital following a wrong diagnosis and lack of effective EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31202
ALBUL AND OTHERS v. Ukraine
ALBUL AND OTHERS v. Ukraine UKR 18/06/2020 00:00:00 19/06/2020 16:03:34 Case Description: Functioning of justice: Excessive length of criminal/civil proceedings as well as the lack of effective remedy in this respect. Article 6 1 and 13 Status of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55423
ALEKSANDROV v. Ukraine
ALEKSANDROV v. Ukraine UKR 09/01/2020 00:00:00 17/01/2020 18:25:44 Case Description: Cooperation with the European Court: Refusal by the authorities to provide the applicant with an effective access to the documents from his criminal file needed to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54545
ALIYEV v. Ukraine
ALIYEV v. Ukraine UKR 10/06/2021 00:00:00 11/06/2021 17:47:07 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Unjustified interference due to the revocation in 2010 of the applicant s residence permit and the issuance of an expulsion order with a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57741
ANDREY YAKOVENKO v. Ukraine
ANDREY YAKOVENKO v. Ukraine UKR 13/06/2014 00:00:00 07/11/2016 13:42:50 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment right to liberty and security as well as functioning of justice: Poor material conditions in detention and in transit between EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-26019
ANDRIY RUDENKO v. Ukraine
ANDRIY RUDENKO v. Ukraine UKR 21/03/2011 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: Protection of property: Unlawful interference due to a domestic court s decisions to terminate a title to a part of a flat a husband had jointly owned with his former EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31618
ARCELORMITTAL AMBALAJ CELIGI SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI v. Ukraine
ARCELORMITTAL AMBALAJ CELIGI SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI v. Ukraine UKR 15/07/2021 00:00:00 06/08/2021 16:22:04 Case Description: Functioning of justice: Unfair civil proceedings on account of the domestic courts failure to address the applicant EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58183
ARSKAYA v. Ukraine
ARSKAYA v. Ukraine UKR 05/03/2014 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: The present group of cases concerns principally the failure of the domestic authorities to carry out effective investigations into allegations of medical negligence by EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31636
AVIAKOMPANIYA A.T.I., ZAT v. Ukraine
AVIAKOMPANIYA A.T.I. ZAT v. Ukraine UKR 05/01/2018 00:00:00 15/01/2018 16:40:37 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair proceedings due to the quashing by the Supreme Court acting as second cassation court of decisions of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-48649
AZALIYA, TOV v. Ukraine
AZALIYA TOV v. Ukraine UKR 09/03/2023 00:00:00 20/03/2023 09:18:50 Case Description: Interference with the applicant companies peaceful enjoyment of its possessions devoid of any legal basis and incompatible with the principle of the rule of law EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-62845
BALATSKYY v. Ukraine
BALATSKYY v. Ukraine UKR 25/01/2008 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of access to a court due to the domestic courts failure to take a formal final decision in the proceedings concerning EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31575
BALITSKIY v. Ukraine
BALITSKIY v. Ukraine UKR 03/02/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the convictions of the applicants between 2002 and 2011 on the basis of self incriminating statements made in the absence of a lawyer and in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31116
BARSKYY v. Ukraine
BARSKYY v. Ukraine UKR 28/09/2017 00:00:00 02/10/2017 14:27:00 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Excessive length of pre trial detention. Article 5 3 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: Individual measures: Just EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47787
BARSOVA v. Russia
BARSOVA v. Russia RUS 22/10/2019 00:00:00 25/10/2019 16:33:48 Case Description: The applicant women in this group of cases were victims of different forms of domestic violence from their male partners/ex partners including repeated assaults abusive and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54105