Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 381 - 400 of 17554
BALSAN v. Romania
BALSAN v. Romania ROU 23/08/2017 00:00:00 15/09/2017 15:07:24 Case Description: This case concerns the failure of the investigating prosecuting and judicial authorities to comply with their positive obligation under Article 3 to protect the applicant from EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47601
BALSAN v. the Czech Republic
BALSAN v. the Czech Republic CZE 18/10/2006 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:27:14 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Lack of a fair trial because of the refusal to grant the applicant the right to question or have questioned the co EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6208
BALTAJI v. Bulgaria
BALTAJI v. Bulgaria BGR 12/10/2011 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: Expulsion / deportation Protection of private life and lack of effective remedy lack of procedural safeguards against expulsion: Arbitrariness in expulsion proceedings based EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4017
BALTEANU v. Romania
BALTEANU v. Romania ROU 16/10/2013 00:00:00 04/11/2016 08:34:40 Case Description: The case has been closed. You can access the final resolution via the case documents tab . Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: Individual measures: just EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13487
BALTIC MASTER LTD. v. Lithuania
BALTIC MASTER LTD. v. Lithuania LTU 16/04/2019 00:00:00 25/04/2019 11:23:50 Case Description: Functioning of justice: Unfair administrative proceedings due to the lack of adequate reasoning for a refusal of the domestic courts in 2016 to refer a question EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-51955
BALTINS v. Latvia
BALTINS v. Latvia LVA 08/04/2013 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:32:42 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Domestic courts failure to properly address the incitement plea in criminal proceedings raised by the applicant who claimed EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31154
BANNIKOV v. Latvia
BANNIKOV v. Latvia LVA 11/09/2013 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:49 Case Description: Excessive length of pre trial detention: lack of sufficient grounds to justify the applicant s continued detention. Status of Execution: On 1 October 2005 the provisions of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31106
BAOTIC v. Bosnia and Herzegovina
BAOTIC v. Bosnia and Herzegovina BIH 18/10/2022 00:00:00 18/10/2022 14:54:25 Case Description: This case concerns a violation of the applicant s right to a fair hearing on account of the failure of the Constitutional Court to enable the applicant to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-61627
BARABOI AND GABURA v. the Republic of Moldova
BARABOI AND GABURA v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 27/04/2021 00:00:00 30/04/2021 16:08:47 Case Description: Right to liberty and security: Unlawful detention on remand and house arrest for more than five months on suspicion of having committed the offence EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57499
BARAN v. Poland
BARAN v. Poland POL 28/08/2013 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:13:46 Case Description: Unlawful deprivation of liberty in a psychiatric hospital refusal of civil claim for compensation by the domestic courts disregarding a final judicial decision in another set of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-19529
BARANOWSKI PIOTR v. Poland
BARANOWSKI PIOTR v. Poland POL 02/01/2008 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:13:46 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Belated examination of the applicant s appeal against the prolongation of his detention on remand. Article 5 4 Status of Execution: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-18931
BARBIER v. France
BARBIER v. France FRA 17/04/2006 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:16:17 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of access to a court as a result of the failure by the prison service to transmit a detainee s note to appeal in due EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33251
BARBORSKI v. Bulgaria
BARBORSKI v. Bulgaria BGR 26/06/2013 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Unlawful detention of the applicant due to the lack of clarity in the regulations governing situations in which different types of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3896
BARBOSA ARAUJO v. Portugal
BARBOSA ARAUJO v. Portugal PRT 09/11/2000 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:02:55 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Excessive length of criminal proceedings in which the applicant had intervened as an auxiliary of the prosecuting EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-9439
BARBOTIN v. France
BARBOTIN v. France FRA 19/02/2021 00:00:00 03/03/2021 17:11:43 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment / conditions of detention / remedy: Ineffective compensation remedy in view of the low award made in respect of inhuman conditions of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56757
BARBU ANGHELESCU v. Romania (no 1)
BARBU ANGHELESCU v. Romania no 1 ROU 05/01/2005 00:00:00 06/11/2016 16:19:47 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment: Abuse suffered by the applicants or their relatives in police custody or upon arrest ineffectiveness of related criminal EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17496
BARBULESCU v. Romania
BARBULESCU v. Romania ROU 05/09/2017 00:00:00 20/09/2017 18:11:03 Case Description: Protection of private life and of correspondence: Disproportionate interference due to the monitoring of an employee s use of the Internet at his place of work and use of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47645
BARCZA AND OTHERS v. Hungary
BARCZA AND OTHERS v. Hungary HUN 11/01/2017 00:00:00 26/04/2017 16:15:53 Case Description: This group concerns lengthy expropriation proceedings hindering the use of the property in question. Barcza: Violation of the right to protection of property EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46703
BARRILLOT v. France
BARRILLOT v. France FRA 29/07/2003 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:10:23 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of criminal proceedings in particular excessive length of the pre trial investigation stage. Article 6 1 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-32553
BARSKYY v. Ukraine
BARSKYY v. Ukraine UKR 28/09/2017 00:00:00 02/10/2017 14:27:00 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Excessive length of pre trial detention. Article 5 3 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: Individual measures: Just EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47787