Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 76
12. Second Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, aiming at the abolition of the death penalty
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 12. Second Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights aiming at the abolition of the death penalty New York 15 December 1989 Entry into force : 11 July 1991 UNIV-12https://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-12&chapter=4&clang=_en
4. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 4. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights New York 16 December 1966 Entry into force : 23 March 1976 in accordance with article 49 for all provisions except those of article 41 UNIV-4https://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-4&chapter=4&clang=_en
A v. New Zealand
A v. New Zealand CCPR/C/66/D/754/1997 Communication number s : 754/1997 Author: A Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 66 Country New Zealand Submission date 19 Apr 1996 Date of decision 15 Jul 1999 Comment: Individual opinion submitted by JUTBCCPR/C/66/D/754/1997https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/802/en-US
Ali Aarrass v. Morocco
Ali Aarrass v. Morocco CAT/C/68/D/817/2017 Communication number s : 817/2017 Author: Ali Aarrass represented by counsel Dounia Alamat and Christophe Marchand Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 68 Country Morocco Submission date 17 Mar 2017 JUTBCAT/C/68/D/817/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2695/en-US
B.A. et al. v. Austria
B.A. et al. v. Austria CCPR/C/127/D/2956/2017 Communication number s : 2956/2017 Author: B.A. et al. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 127 Country Austria Submission date 08 Feb 2017 Date of decision 08 Nov 2019 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/127/D/2956/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2805/en-US
Benali v. Netherlands
Benali v. Netherlands CCPR/C/81/D/1272/2004 Communication number s : 1272/2004 Author: Fatima Benali Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 81 Country Netherlands Submission date 23 Jun 2003 Date of decision 23 Jul 2004 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/81/D/1272/2004https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/958/en-US
CASE OF AGGERHOLM v. DENMARK
CASE OF AGGERHOLM v. DENMARK 45439/18 JENSEN T. DNK 9/15/2020 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Degrading treatment Inhuman treatment Non pecuniary damage award Article 41 Non pecuniary damage Just satisfaction 350 90 193 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0915JUD004543918https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-204602
CASE OF ARMANI DA SILVA v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF ARMANI DA SILVA v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 5878/08 WISTRICH H. GBR 3/30/2016 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible No violation of Article 2 Right to life Article 2 1 Effective investigation Procedural aspect Offences under the Health and Safety at Work ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0330JUD000587808https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-161975
CASE OF BIG BROTHER WATCH AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF BIG BROTHER WATCH AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 58170/13 62322/14 24960/15 CAREY D. CURLING R. NORTON E. GBR 9/13/2018 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Manifestly ill founded Violation of Article 8 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0913JUD005817013https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-186048
CASE OF BUJAK v. POLAND
CASE OF BUJAK v. POLAND 686/12 SLUPSKA UCZKIEWICZ B. POL 3/21/2017 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Degrading treatment Inhuman treatment Substantive aspect No violation of Article 5 Right to liberty and security Article ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0321JUD000068612https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-172103
CASE OF BULLEN AND SONEJI v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF BULLEN AND SONEJI v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 3383/06 SEELEY N. GBR 1/8/2009 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 6 Right to a fair trial 445 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0108JUD000338306 FOURTH SECTION CASE OF BULLEN AND SONEJI v. THE UNITED KINGDOM Application no. ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0108JUD000338306https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-90398
CASE OF ÖCALAN v. TURKEY
CASE OF CALAN v. TURKEY 46221/99 KENTRIDGE Sir Sydney MULLER Mark OTTY Timothy TUGLUK Aysel TUR 5/12/2005 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Article 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Violation of Article 5 Right to liberty and security Article ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0512JUD004622199https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-69022
CASE OF ÖCALAN v. TURKEY
CASE OF CALAN v. TURKEY 46221/99 N/A TUR 3/12/2003 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Article 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Violation of Article 5 Right to liberty and security Article 5 4 Review of lawfulness of detention Violation of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0312JUD004622199https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-60979
CASE OF F.G. v. SWEDEN
CASE OF F.G. v. SWEDEN 43611/11 LOVEDAY D. SWE 3/23/2016 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible No violation of Article 2 Right to life Article 2 Expulsion Conditional Iran No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Expulsion Conditional Iran ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0323JUD004361111https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-161829
CASE OF HASSAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF HASSAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 29750/09 SHINER P. OTTY T. HICKMAN T. GBR 9/16/2014 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible No violation of Article 5 Right to liberty and security Article 5 1 Deprivation of liberty Lawful arrest or detention No violation ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0916JUD002975009https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-146501
CASE OF JONES AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF JONES AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 34356/06 40528/06 CUKIER G. ALLEN T. GBR 1/14/2014 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 6 Right to a fair trial Article 6 Criminal proceedings Article 6 1 Access to court No violation of Article 6 Right to a ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0114JUD003435606https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-140005
CASE OF KEHOE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF KEHOE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 2010/06 WHITFIELD L. GBR 6/17/2008 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 6 No violation of Art. 13 Child Support Act 1991 445 7 40 444 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0617JUD000201006 FOURTH SECTION CASE OF KEHOE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0617JUD000201006https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-86980
CASE OF LUSTIG-PREAN AND BECKETT v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF LUSTIG PREAN AND BECKETT v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 31417/96 32377/96 N/A GBR 9/27/1999 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 8 No separate issue under Art. 14 8 Just satisfaction reserved Army Act 1955 Air Force Act 1955 Naval Discipline Act 1957 Sexual ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0927JUD003141796https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58407
CASE OF McGINLEY AND EGAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF McGINLEY AND EGAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 21825/93 23414/94 N/A GBR 6/9/1998 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection allowed non exhaustion of domestic remedies No violation of Art. 6 1 No violation of Art. 8 Not necessary to examine Art. 13 445 7 310 451 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0609JUD002182593https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58175
CASE OF SARGSYAN v. AZERBAIJAN
CASE OF SARGSYAN v. AZERBAIJAN 40167/06 GASPARYAN N. OHANYAN K. AZE 6/16/2015 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Article 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Preliminary objection dismissed Article 35 3 Continuing situation Preliminary objection ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0616JUD004016706https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-155662