Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 47
11. b Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the involvement of children in armed conflict
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 11. b Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the involvement of children in armed conflict New York 25 May 2000 Entry into force : 12 February 2002 in accordance UNIV-11-bhttps://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-11-b&chapter=4&clang=_en
A.M.M. v. Switzerland
A.M.M. v. Switzerland CERD/C/84/D/50/2012 Communication number s : 050/2012 Author: A.M.M. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 84 Country Switzerland Submission date 08 Jan 2012 Date of decision 18 Feb 2014 Comment: This document has no JUTBCERD/C/84/D/50/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1799/en-US
CASE OF AGGERHOLM v. DENMARK
CASE OF AGGERHOLM v. DENMARK 45439/18 JENSEN T. DNK 9/15/2020 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Degrading treatment Inhuman treatment Non pecuniary damage award Article 41 Non pecuniary damage Just satisfaction 350 90 193 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0915JUD004543918https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-204602
CASE OF ARMANI DA SILVA v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF ARMANI DA SILVA v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 5878/08 WISTRICH H. GBR 3/30/2016 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible No violation of Article 2 Right to life Article 2 1 Effective investigation Procedural aspect Offences under the Health and Safety at Work ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0330JUD000587808https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-161975
CASE OF BIG BROTHER WATCH AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF BIG BROTHER WATCH AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 58170/13 62322/14 24960/15 CAREY D. CURLING R. NORTON E. GBR 9/13/2018 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Manifestly ill founded Violation of Article 8 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0913JUD005817013https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-186048
CASE OF BIG BROTHER WATCH AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF BIG BROTHER WATCH AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 58170/13 62322/14 24960/15 CAREY D. CURLING R. NORTON E. GBR 5/25/2021 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 34 Individual applications Art. 34 Victim Violation of Article 8 Right to ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0525JUD005817013https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-210077
CASE OF CHRISTINE GOODWIN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF CHRISTINE GOODWIN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 28957/95 N/A GBR 7/11/2002 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 8 Violation of Art. 12 No separate issue under Art. 14 No violation of Art. 13 Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Costs and expenses ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0711JUD002895795https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-60596
CASE OF HANIF AND KHAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF HANIF AND KHAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 52999/08 61779/08 HOWELLS GBR 12/20/2011 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 6 1 Pecuniary and non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Juries Act 1974 1974 Act 445 76 180 216 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1220JUD005299908https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-108168
CASE OF HASSAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF HASSAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 29750/09 SHINER P. OTTY T. HICKMAN T. GBR 9/16/2014 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible No violation of Article 5 Right to liberty and security Article 5 1 Deprivation of liberty Lawful arrest or detention No violation ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0916JUD002975009https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-146501
CASE OF I. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF I. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 25680/94 GBR 7/11/2002 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 8 Violation of Art. 12 No separate issue under Art. 14 Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient 451 429 310 450 240 343 216 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0711JUD002568094https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-60595
CASE OF LIBERTY AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF LIBERTY AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 58243/00 GASK A. GBR 7/1/2008 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 8 Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Sections 1 10 of the Interception of Communications Act 1985 Sections 2 5 and 16 of the ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0701JUD005824300https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-87207
CASE OF SARGSYAN v. AZERBAIJAN
CASE OF SARGSYAN v. AZERBAIJAN 40167/06 GASPARYAN N. OHANYAN K. AZE 6/16/2015 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Article 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Preliminary objection dismissed Article 35 3 Continuing situation Preliminary objection ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0616JUD004016706https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-155662
CASE OF TIRAMAVIA S.R.L. AND OTHERS v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
CASE OF TIRAMAVIA S.R.L. AND OTHERS v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA 54115/09 55707/09 55770/09 PADURARU I. MDA 9/4/2018 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 Protection of property Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 Peaceful enjoyment of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0904JUD005411509https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-186021
CASE OF X v. LATVIA
CASE OF X v. LATVIA 27853/09 STRAUSS R. LVA 11/26/2013 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 Positive obligations Article 8 1 Respect for family life Section 644 of the Latvian Civil Procedure Act 451 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1126JUD002785309https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-138992
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament, judges and prosecutors EVALUATION REPORT DENMARK
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament judges and prosecutors EVALUATION REPORT DENMARK DNK 2014 03 28 2014 04 16 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I. INTRODUCTION AND METHODOLOGY II. CONTEXT III. CORRUPTION GRECOGreco-Eval-IV-Rep-2013-6E-Final-Denmark-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=Greco-Eval-IV-Rep-2013-6E-Final-Denmark-PUBLIC
Fifth Round Evaluation Report on Denmark
Fifth Round Evaluation Report on Denmark DNK 2019 06 21 2019 09 04 Adoption: 21.06.2019 Publication: 04.09.2019 Public GrecoEval5Rep 2018 8 FIFTH EVALUATION ROUND Preventing corruption and promoting integrity in central governments top executive functions GRECOGrecoEval5Rep(2018)8-Final-eng-Denmark-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=GrecoEval5Rep(2018)8-Final-eng-Denmark-PUBLIC
Follow-up report v. Australia,Bosnia and Herzegovina,Morocco,New Zealand,Russian Federation,Spain,Sweden,Switzerland
Follow up report v. Australia Bosnia and Herzegovina Morocco New Zealand Russian Federation Spain Sweden Switzerland CAT/C/71/2 Communication number s : 637/2014 817/2017 852/2017 882/2018 854/2017 818/2017 729/2016 681/2015 Author: Type of decision: JUTBCAT/C/71/2https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3588/en-US
L.G. v. Republic of Korea
L.G. v. Republic of Korea CERD/C/86/D/51/2012 Communication number s : 51/2012 Author: L.G. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 86 Country Republic of Korea Submission date 12 Dec 2012 Date of decision 01 May 2015 Comment: This document has no JUTBCERD/C/86/D/51/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3019/en-US
Mann Singh v. France
Mann Singh v. France CCPR/C/108/D/1928/2010 Communication number s : 1928/2010 Author: Shingara Mann Singh Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 108 Country France Submission date 15 Dec 2008 Date of decision 19 Jul 2013 Comment: Pursuant to JUTBCCPR/C/108/D/1928/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1671/en-US
O.K. v. Latvia
O.K. v. Latvia CCPR/C/110/D/1935/2010 Communication number s : 1935/2010 Author: O.K. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 110 Country Latvia Submission date 13 Nov 2009 Date of decision 19 Mar 2014 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/110/D/1935/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1810/en-US