Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 27
CASE OF AMANN v. SWITZERLAND
CASE OF AMANN v. SWITZERLAND 27798/95 N/A CHE 2/16/2000 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 8 with regard to interception of telephone call Violation of Art. 8 with regard to creation and storing of information card Preliminary objection dismissed Non pecuniary ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0216JUD002779895https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58497
CASE OF BAŞKAYA AND OKÇUOGLU v. TURKEY
CASE OF BA KAYA AND OK UOGLU v. TURKEY 23536/94 24408/94 N/A TUR 7/8/1999 12:00:00 AM Lack of jurisdiction to examine complaint under Art. 3 Lack of jurisdiction to examine complaint under Art. 14 No violation of Art. 7 first applicant Violation of Art. 7 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0708JUD002353694https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58276
CASE OF C.R. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF C.R. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 20190/92 N/A GBR 11/22/1995 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 7 1 Sexual Offences Amendment Act 1976 section 1 1 a Court of Appeal Criminal Division R. v. R. judgment of 14 March 1991 1991 2 All England Law Reports 257 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:1122JUD002019092https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57955
CASE OF CANTONI v. FRANCE
CASE OF CANTONI v. FRANCE 17862/91 N/A FRA 11/15/1996 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 7 Public Health Code Articles L. 511 512 L. 517 and L. 658 5 Court of Appeal of Douai judgments of 9 April 1987 20 February 1988 28 October 1988 and 23 March 1989 Court ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:1115JUD001786291https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58068
CASE OF COEME AND OTHERS v. BELGIUM
CASE OF COEME AND OTHERS v. BELGIUM 32492/96 32547/96 32548/96 33209/96 33210/96 N/A BEL 6/22/2000 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 6 1 in respect of Mr Coeme fair hearing Not necessary to examine Art. 6 2 and 6 3 Violation of Art. 6 1 tribunal established ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0622JUD003249296https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-59194
CASE OF DMITRIYEVSKIY v. RUSSIA
CASE OF DMITRIYEVSKIY v. RUSSIA 42168/06 SADOVSKAYA O. RUS 10/3/2017 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 10 Freedom of expression general Article 10 1 Freedom of expression Non pecuniary damage award Article 41 Non pecuniary damage Just satisfaction Article ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1003JUD004216806https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-177214
CASE OF EDITORIAL BOARD OF PRAVOYE DELO AND SHTEKEL v. UKRAINE
CASE OF EDITORIAL BOARD OF PRAVOYE DELO AND SHTEKEL v. UKRAINE 33014/05 OPRYSHKO L.V. UKR 5/5/2011 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed Violation of Article 10 Freedom of expression General Article 10 1 Freedom of expression ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0505JUD003301405https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-104685
CASE OF GORZELIK AND OTHERS v. POLAND
CASE OF GORZELIK AND OTHERS v. POLAND 44158/98 N/A POL 2/17/2004 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 11 Constitution of 1997 Articles 32 35 and 58 Civil Code Articles 5 and 8 The Law on Associations Articles 1 8 10 12 14 and 16 The 1993 Elections Act ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0217JUD004415898https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-61637
CASE OF HASHMAN AND HARRUP v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF HASHMAN AND HARRUP v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 25594/94 GBR 11/25/1999 12:00:00 AM Not necessary to examine Art. 11 Violation of Art. 10 Costs and expenses award Convention proceedings Justices of the Peace Act 1361 Magistrates Courts Act 1980 section ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:1125JUD002559494https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58365
CASE OF HERTEL v. SWITZERLAND
CASE OF HERTEL v. SWITZERLAND 25181/94 N/A CHE 8/25/1998 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 10 Not necessary to examine Art. 6 1 Not necessary to examine Art. 8 Pecuniary damage claim dismissed Costs and expenses partial award domestic proceedings Costs and ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0825JUD002518194https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-59366
CASE OF HILDA HAFSTEINSDOTTIR v. ICELAND
CASE OF HILDA HAFSTEINSDOTTIR v. ICELAND 40905/98 N/A ISL 6/8/2004 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 5 1 Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Costs and expenses partial award Convention proceedings Code of Criminal Procedure Articles 34 and 61 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0608JUD004090598https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-61813
CASE OF JULY AND SARL LIBERATION v. FRANCE [Extracts]
CASE OF JULY AND SARL LIBERATION v. FRANCE Extracts 20893/03 LECLERC H. Me BROUQUET CANALE FRA 2/14/2008 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 10 Remainder inadmissible Pecuniary damage award Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Chapter IV of the ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0214JUD002089303https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-85084
CASE OF LABITA v. ITALY
CASE OF LABITA v. ITALY 26772/95 N/A ITA 4/6/2000 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 3 with regard to alleged ill treatment Violation of Art. 3 with regard to lack of effective investigation No violation of Art. 3 with regard to conditions of transfer ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0406JUD002677295https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58559
CASE OF LAMBERT v. FRANCE
CASE OF LAMBERT v. FRANCE 23618/94 N/A FRA 8/24/1998 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 8 Not necessary to examine Art. 13 Non pecuniary damage financial award Costs and expenses award Convention proceedings Costs and expenses award domestic proceedings Code ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0824JUD002361894https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58219
CASE OF LINDON, OTCHAKOVSKY-LAURENS AND JULY v. FRANCE
CASE OF LINDON OTCHAKOVSKY LAURENS AND JULY v. FRANCE 21279/02 36448/02 LECLERC H. RAPPAPORT R. FRA 10/22/2007 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 10 No violation of Art. 6 1 Sections 29 32 1 and 42 of the Freedom of the Press Act of 29 July 1881 149 105 148 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1022JUD002127902https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-82846
CASE OF McLEOD v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF McLEOD v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 24755/94 N/A GBR 9/23/1998 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 8 Not necessary to examine P1 1 Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Costs and expenses partial award domestic proceedings Costs and expenses ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0923JUD002475594https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58241
CASE OF PANIOGLU v. ROMANIA
CASE OF PANIOGLU v. ROMANIA 33794/14 POPESCU C.L. ROU 12/8/2020 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 b No significant disadvantage Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Manifestly ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1208JUD003379414https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-206352
CASE OF REKVÉNYI v. HUNGARY
CASE OF REKV NYI v. HUNGARY 25390/94 N/A HUN 5/20/1999 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 10 No violation of Art. 11 No violation of Art. 14 10 No violation of Art. 14 11 Act no. 107 of 1993 on Certain Amendments to the Constitution Constitution Article ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0520JUD002539094https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58262
CASE OF ROTARU v. ROMANIA
CASE OF ROTARU v. ROMANIA 28341/95 N/A ROU 5/4/2000 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed victim Preliminary objection dismissed non exhaustion Violation of Art. 8 Violation of Art. 13 Violation of Art. 6 1 Non pecuniary damage financial award Costs ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0504JUD002834195https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58586
CASE OF S.W. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF S.W. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 20166/92 N/A GBR 11/22/1995 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 7 1 Sexual Offences Amendment Act 1976 section 1 1 a Court of Appeal Criminal Division R. v. R. judgment of 14 March 1991 1991 2 All England Law Reports 257 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:1122JUD002016692https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57965