Search

Displaying 161 - 180 of 452

Fourth Opinion on Azerbaijan

Fourth Opinion on Azerbaijan AZE ACFC/OP/IV 2017 006 2017 11 08 ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES Restricted ACFC/OP/IV 2017 006 Fourth Opinion on Azerbaijan adopted on 8 November 2017 Summary Society FCNMACFC/OP/IV(2017)006

https://hudoc.fcnm.coe.int/eng?i=4th_OP_Azerbaijan_en

Fourth Opinion on Bosnia and Herzegovina

Fourth Opinion on Bosnia and Herzegovina BIH ACFC/OP/IV 2017 007 2017 11 09 ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES ACFC/OP/IV 2017 007 Fourth Opinion on Bosnia and Herzegovina adopted on 9 November 2017 FCNMACFC/OP/IV(2017)007

https://hudoc.fcnm.coe.int/eng?i=4th_OP_BiH_en

Fourth Opinion on Germany

Fourth Opinion on Germany DEU ACFC/OP/IV 2015 003 2015 03 19 ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES Strasbourg 19 March 2015 ACFC/OP/IV 2015 003 Fourth Opinion on Germany adopted on 19 March 2015 EXECUTIVE FCNMACFC/OP/IV(2015)003

https://hudoc.fcnm.coe.int/eng?i=4th_OP_Germany_en

Fourth Opinion on Lithuania

Fourth Opinion on Lithuania LTU ACFC/OP/IV 2018 004 2018 05 30 ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES Restricted ACFC/OP/IV 2018 004 Fourth Opinion on Lithuania adopted on 30 May 2018 Summary Lithuanian FCNMACFC/OP/IV(2018)004

https://hudoc.fcnm.coe.int/eng?i=4th_OP_Lithuania_en

Fourth Opinion on Poland

Fourth Opinion on Poland POL ACFC/OP/IV 2019 003 2019 11 06 2020 01 23 ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES ACFC/OP/IV 2019 003 Fourth Opinion on Poland adopted on 6 November 2019 Summary Persons FCNMACFC/OP/IV(2019)003

https://hudoc.fcnm.coe.int/eng?i=4th_Op_Poland_EN

Fourth Opinion on the United Kingdom

Fourth Opinion on the United Kingdom GBR ACFC/OP/IV 2016 005 2016 05 25 ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES Strasbourg 27 February 2017 ACFC/OP/IV 2016 005 Fourth Opinion on the United Kingdom adopted FCNMACFC/OP/IV(2016)005

https://hudoc.fcnm.coe.int/eng?i=4th_OP_UnitedKingdom_en

Fourth report on Romania

Fourth report on Romania ROU 2014 03 19 2014 06 03 CRI 2014 19 ECRI REPORT ON Romania fourth monitoring cycle Adopted on 19 March 2014 Published on 3 June 2014 ECRI Secretariat Directorate General II Democracy Council of Europe F 67075 STRASBOURG Cedex ECRIROU-CbC-IV-2014-019-ENG

https://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=ROU-CbC-IV-2014-019-ENG

Gemma Beasley v. Australia

Gemma Beasley v. Australia CRPD/C/15/D/11/2013 Communication number s : 011/2013 Author: Gemma Beasley Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 15 Country Australia Submission date 29 Apr 2013 Date of decision 01 Apr 2016 Comment: This document has JUTBCRPD/C/15/D/11/2013

https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2142/en-US

Government comments on the first report on Serbia

Government comments on the first report on Serbia SRB 2007 12 14 2008 04 29 APPENDIX The following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in Serbia ECRI wishes to point out that the analysis contained in its ECRISRB-COM-III-2008-025-ENG

https://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=SRB-COM-III-2008-025-ENG

Government comments on the fourth report on Latvia

Government comments on the fourth report on Latvia LVA 2011 12 09 2012 02 21 Government comments on the report on LATVIA APPENDIX: GOVERNMENT S VIEWPOINT APPENDIXThe following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the ECRILVA-COM-IV-2012-003-ENG

https://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=LVA-COM-IV-2012-003-ENG

Government comments on the second report on Poland

Government comments on the second report on Poland POL 1999 12 10 2000 06 27 The following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in Poland. APPENDIX ECRI wishes to point out that the analysis contained in ECRIPOL-COM-II-2002-034-ENG

https://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=POL-COM-II-2002-034-ENG

Government comments on the third report on Italy

Government comments on the third report on Italy ITA 2005 12 16 2006 05 16 APPENDIX The following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in Italy ECRI wishes to point out that the analysis contained in its ECRIITA-COM-III-2006-019-ENG

https://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=ITA-COM-III-2006-019-ENG

H. E-M. v. Canada

H. E M. v. Canada CAT/C/46/D/395/2009 Communication number s : 395/2009 Author: H. E M. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 46 Country Canada Submission date 17 Aug 2009 Date of decision 23 May 2011 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/46/D/395/2009

https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/54/en-US

H.I.A. v. Sweden

H.I.A. v. Sweden CAT/C/30/D/216/2002 Communication number s : 216/2002 Author: H.I.A. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 30 Country Sweden Submission date 02 Aug 2002 Date of decision 02 May 2003 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/30/D/216/2002

https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/170/en-US

H.L. v. Australia

H.L. v. Australia CAT/C/71/D/754/2016 Communication number s : 754/2016 Author: H.L. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 71 Country Australia Submission date 27 Apr 2016 Date of decision 22 Jul 2021 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/71/D/754/2016

https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3358/en-US

H.O. v. Sweden

H.O. v. Sweden CAT/C/27/D/178/2001 Communication number s : 178/2001 Author: H.O. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 27 Country Sweden Submission date 11 Jan 2001 Date of decision 13 Nov 2001 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCAT/C/27/D/178/2001

https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/179/en-US

Human Rights Council adopts outcomes of Universal Periodic Review on Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Sudan and Hungary

Human Rights Council MORNING 23 September 2011 Continues General Debate on Human Rights Situations that Require the Council s Attention The Human Rights Council this morning adopted the outcomes of the Universal Periodic Review on Saint Vincent and the UPR

https://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2011/09/human-rights-council-adopts-outcomes-universal-periodic-review-saint-vincent

Human Rights Council holds separate general debates on the universal periodic review, and on the situation of human rights in Palestine and other occupied arab territories

30 September 2020 The Human Rights Council this morning held separate general debates on the Universal Periodic Review and on the situation of human rights in Palestine and other occupied Arab territories. Speaking in the general debate on the Universal UPR

https://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2020/09/human-rights-council-holds-separate-general-debates-universal-periodic

I.A.K. v. Denmark,Iraq

I.A.K. v. Denmark Iraq CCPR/C/118/D/2115/2011 Communication number s : 2115/2011 Author: I.A.K. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 118 Country Denmark Iraq Submission date 01 Jun 2011 Date of decision 03 Nov 2016 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/118/D/2115/2011

https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2241/en-US

ISRAEL: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS

ISRAEL: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CCPR/C/ISR/CO/5 NULL 2022 05 05T00:00:00 CCPR United Nations CCPR/C/ISR/CO/5 International Covenant on Distr.: General 5 May 2022 Civil and Political Rights Original: English Human Rights Committee Concluding observations UHRICCPR/C/ISR/CO/5

https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/ece19710-5d03-4bbb-bf45-0d8f941df75c

Data source

EU member states

Other countries

Keywords

Tags