Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 37
A.B. v. Canada
A.B. v. Canada CCPR/C/117/D/2387/2014 Communication number s : 2387/2014 Author: A.B. represented by counsel Laura Brittain then Benjamin Liston Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 117 Country Canada Submission date 29 Apr 2014 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/117/D/2387/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2197/en-US
A/HRC/47/9: Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review - Saint Lucia
United Nations A/HRC/47/9 General Assembly Distr.: General 14 April 2021 Original: English Human Rights Council Forty seventh session 21 June 9 July 2021 Agenda item 6 Universal periodic review Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review UPRA/HRC/47/9https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/country-reports/ahrc479-report-working-group-universal-periodic-review-saint-lucia
CASE OF ABDULAZIZ, CABALES AND BALKANDALI v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF ABDULAZIZ CABALES AND BALKANDALI v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 9214/80 9473/81 9474/81 N/A GBR 5/28/1985 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 14 8 Violation of Art. 13 Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Costs and expenses award Convention ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1985:0528JUD000921480https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57416
CASE OF JALOUD v. THE NETHERLANDS
CASE OF JALOUD v. THE NETHERLANDS 47708/08 ZEGVELD L. EIKELBOOM A.W. NLD 11/20/2014 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 2 Right to life Article 2 Positive obligations Article 2 1 Effective investigation Procedural aspect Non pecuniary damage award Article 38 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1120JUD004770808https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-148367
CASE OF MAKTOUF AND DAMJANOVIĆ v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA
CASE OF MAKTOUF AND DAMJANOVI v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA 2312/08 34179/08 LOZO A. MEHIC I. BIH 7/18/2013 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 7 No punishment without law Article 7 1 Heavier penalty Retroactivity Pecuniary damage claim ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0718JUD000231208https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-122716
CASE OF MAMATKULOV AND ABDURASULOVIC v. TURKEY
CASE OF MAMATKULOV AND ABDURASULOVIC v. TURKEY 46827/99 46951/99 N/A TUR 2/6/2003 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 3 No violation of Art. 6 as regard the extradition proceedings No separate issue under Art. 6 as regard the other complaints Violation of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0206JUD004682799https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-60924
CASE OF MAMATKULOV AND ASKAROV v. TURKEY
CASE OF MAMATKULOV AND ASKAROV v. TURKEY 46827/99 46951/99 CARSANCAKLI I.S. TUR 2/4/2005 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 3 Not necessary to examine Art. 2 Inadmissible under Art. 6 concerning the exradition proceedings No violation of Art. 6 1 Failure to ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0204JUD004682799https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-68183
CASE OF RANTSEV v. CYPRUS AND RUSSIA
CASE OF RANTSEV v. CYPRUS AND RUSSIA 25965/04 CHURKINA L. M. CYP RUS 1/7/2010 12:00:00 AM Request for strike out rejected Preliminary objection dismissed ratione loci Preliminary objection joined to the merits ratione materiae Preliminary objection ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0107JUD002596504https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-96549
Engo v. Cameroon
Engo v. Cameroon CCPR/C/96/D/1397/2005 Communication number s : 1397/2005 Author: Pierre D sir Engo Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 96 Country Cameroon Submission date 30 Mar 2005 Date of decision 22 Jul 2009 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/96/D/1397/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1527/en-US
Government comments on the third report on Italy
Government comments on the third report on Italy ITA 2005 12 16 2006 05 16 APPENDIX The following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in Italy ECRI wishes to point out that the analysis contained in its ECRIITA-COM-III-2006-019-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=ITA-COM-III-2006-019-ENG
Kell v. Canada
Kell v. Canada CEDAW/C/51/D/19/2008 Communication number s : 019/2008 Author: Cecilia Kell Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 51 Country Canada Submission date 24 Jun 2008 Date of decision 28 Feb 2012 Comment: The text of one individual JUTBCEDAW/C/51/D/19/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1718/en-US
Natalya Pinchuk v. Belarus
Natalya Pinchuk v. Belarus CCPR/C/112/D/2165/2012 Communication number s : 2165/2012 Author: Natalya Pinchuk represented by counsel Antoine Bernard Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 112 Country Belarus Submission date 12 Apr 2012 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/112/D/2165/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1938/en-US
REPORT OF THE SPECIAL RAPPORTEUR ON THE HUMAN RIGHTS OF MIGRANTS, JORGE BUSTAMANTE : ADDENDUM: MISSION TO JAPAN
REPORT OF THE SPECIAL RAPPORTEUR ON THE HUMAN RIGHTS OF MIGRANTS JORGE BUSTAMANTE : ADDENDUM: MISSION TO JAPAN A/HRC/17/33/Add.3 NULL 2011 03 20T05:00:00 SR Migrants United Nations A/HRC/17/33/Add.3 Distr.: General 21 March 2011 General Assembly Original: UHRIA/HRC/17/33/Add.3https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/d1652c85-fa7a-4db5-b0bf-77ac3f88fbac
REPORT OF THE WG ON UPR - NEW ZEALAND
REPORT OF THE WG ON UPR NEW ZEALAND A/HRC/26/3 NULL 2014 04 06T00:00:00 UPR United Nations A/HRC/26/3 General Assembly Distr.: General 7 April 2014 Original: English Human Rights Council Twenty sixth session Agenda item 6 Universal Periodic Review Report UHRIA/HRC/26/3https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/29c890ae-519f-4b18-b9de-0df5c86ef7ff
REPORT OF THE WORKING GROUP ON THE UNIVERSAL PERIODIC REVIEW : BHUTAN
REPORT OF THE WORKING GROUP ON THE UNIVERSAL PERIODIC REVIEW : BHUTAN A/HRC/27/8 NULL 2014 06 30T00:00:00 UPR United Nations A/HRC/27/8 General Assembly Distr.: General 1 July 2014 Original: English Human Rights Council Twenty seventh session Agenda item UHRIA/HRC/27/8https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/67466378-ca74-4c38-9570-d80fa9ea7570
REPORT OF THE WORKING GROUP ON THE UNIVERSAL PERIODIC REVIEW : COTE D'IVOIRE
REPORT OF THE WORKING GROUP ON THE UNIVERSAL PERIODIC REVIEW : COTE D IVOIRE A/HRC/27/6 NULL 2014 07 06T00:00:00 UPR United Nations A/HRC/27/6 General Assembly Distr.: General 7 July 2014 English Original: English/French Human Rights Council Twenty UHRIA/HRC/27/6https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/e26c6acb-5d93-4125-8183-912df5b666fb
REPORT OF THE WORKING GROUP ON THE UNIVERSAL PERIODIC REVIEW : PORTUGAL
REPORT OF THE WORKING GROUP ON THE UNIVERSAL PERIODIC REVIEW : PORTUGAL A/HRC/27/7 NULL 2014 07 06T00:00:00 UPR United Nations A/HRC/27/7 General Assembly Distr.: General 7 July 2014 Original: English Human Rights Council Twenty seventh session Agenda UHRIA/HRC/27/7https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/be8925c9-0343-4d85-9914-d3bf9c20a7cf
REPORT OF THE WORKING GROUP ON THE UNIVERSAL PERIODIC REVIEW :SAINT LUCIA
REPORT OF THE WORKING GROUP ON THE UNIVERSAL PERIODIC REVIEW :SAINT LUCIA A/HRC/47/9 NULL 2021 04 14T00:00:00 UPR United Nations A/HRC/47/9 General Assembly Distr.: General 14 April 2021 Original: English Human Rights Council Forty seventh session 21 June UHRIA/HRC/47/9https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/073715b5-ca24-4acf-ad68-86ebf52209e0
REPORT OF THE WORKING GROUP ON THE UNIVERSAL PERIODIC REVIEW : SPAIN
REPORT OF THE WORKING GROUP ON THE UNIVERSAL PERIODIC REVIEW : SPAIN A/HRC/29/8 NULL 2015 04 12T00:00:00 UPR United Nations A/HRC/29/8 General Assembly Distr.: General 13 April 2015 Original: English Human Rights Council Twenty ninth session Agenda item 6 UHRIA/HRC/29/8https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/31057e4a-c191-4f8d-8115-172db43ea8f3
Rameka et al. v. New Zealand
Rameka et al. v. New Zealand CCPR/C/79/D/1090/2002 Communication number s : 1090/2002 Author: Tai Wairiki Rameka et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 79 Country New Zealand Submission date 09 Mar 2002 Date of decision 06 Nov 2003 JUTBCCPR/C/79/D/1090/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1090/en-US