Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1421 - 1440 of 1637
Lovell v. Australia
Lovell v. Australia CCPR/C/80/D/920/2000 Communication number s : 920/2000 Author: Avon Lovell Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 80 Country Australia Submission date 02 Dec 1999 Date of decision 24 Mar 2004 Comment: An individual opinion was JUTBCCPR/C/80/D/920/2000https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1100/en-US
Ltaief v. Tunisia
Ltaief v. Tunisia CAT/C/31/D/189/2001 Communication number s : 189/2001 Author: Bouabdallah Ltaief Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 31 Country Tunisia Submission date 30 Jun 2000 Date of decision 14 Nov 2003 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/31/D/189/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/163/en-US
Luciano Daniel Juárez v. Argentina
Luciano Daniel Ju rez v. Argentina E/C.12/68/D/149/2019 Communication number s : 149/2019 Author: Luciano Daniel Ju rez Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 68 Virtual Session Country Argentina Submission date 01 Feb 2018 Date of decision JUTBE/C.12/68/D/149/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2770/en-US
M.D.T. v. Democratic Republic of the Congo,Switzerland
M.D.T. v. Democratic Republic of the Congo Switzerland CAT/C/48/D/382/2009 Communication number s : 382/2009 Author: M.D.T. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 48 Country Democratic Republic of the Congo Switzerland Submission date 11 Apr 2009 JUTBCAT/C/48/D/382/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/35/en-US
M.K. v. Switzerland
M.K. v. Switzerland CAT/C/60/D/662/2015 Communication number s : 662/2015 Author: M.K. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 60 Country Switzerland Submission date 04 Mar 2015 Date of decision 02 May 2017 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/60/D/662/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3017/en-US
MAKSYMENKO AND GERASYMENKO v. Ukraine
MAKSYMENKO AND GERASYMENKO v. Ukraine UKR 16/08/2013 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the failure of the domestic courts to examine the proportionality of the interference with the applicants property rights EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-32248
Manuel v. New Zealand
Manuel v. New Zealand CCPR/C/91/D/1385/2005 Communication number s : 1385/2005 Author: Benjamin Manuel Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 91 Country New Zealand Submission date 06 Apr 2005 Date of decision 18 Oct 2007 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/91/D/1385/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1379/en-US
Maroufidou v. Sweden
Maroufidou v. Sweden CCPR/C/12/D/58/1979 Communication number s : 058/1979 Author: Anna Maroufidou Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 12 Country Sweden Submission date 05 Sep 1979 Date of decision 09 Apr 1981 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/12/D/58/1979https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/564/en-US
Martínez Fernández v. Spain
Mart nez Fern ndez v. Spain CCPR/C/83/D/1104/2002 Communication number s : 1104/2002 Author: Antonio Mart nez Fern ndez Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 83 Country Spain Submission date 31 Jul 2001 Date of decision 29 Mar 2005 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/83/D/1104/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/979/en-US
Masih Shakeel v. Canada
Masih Shakeel v. Canada CCPR/C/108/D/1881/2009 Communication number s : 1881/2009 Author: Masih Shakeel Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 108 Country Canada Submission date 24 Jun 2009 Date of decision 24 Jul 2013 Comment: The texts of two JUTBCCPR/C/108/D/1881/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1670/en-US
McCallum v. South Africa
McCallum v. South Africa CCPR/C/100/D/1818/2008 Communication number s : 1818/2008 Author: Bradley McCallum Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 100 Country South Africa Submission date 16 Oct 2008 Date of decision 25 Oct 2010 Comment: Pursuant JUTBCCPR/C/100/D/1818/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1596/en-US
Miller et.al. v. New Zealand
Miller et.al. v. New Zealand CCPR/C/119/D/2502/2014 Communication number s : 2502/2014 Author: Allan Brian Miller and Michael John Carroll Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 119 Country New Zealand Submission date 17 Feb 2014 Date of decision JUTBCCPR/C/119/D/2502/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2433/en-US
Muhonen v. Finland
Muhonen v. Finland CCPR/C/24/D/89/1981 Communication number s : 089/1981 Author: Paavo Muhonen Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 24 Country Finland Submission date 28 Mar 1981 Date of decision 08 Apr 1985 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/24/D/89/1981https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/730/en-US
N.B-M. v. Switzerland
N.B M. v. Switzerland CAT/C/47/D/347/2008 Communication number s : 347/2008 Author: N.B M. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 47 Country Switzerland Submission date 10 Apr 2008 Date of decision 14 Nov 2011 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/47/D/347/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/38/en-US
N.B and M.W.J v. United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
N.B and M.W.J v. United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland CRPD/C/22/D/43/2017 Communication number s : 43/2017 Author: N.B and M.W.J Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 22 Country United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern JUTBCRPD/C/22/D/43/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3124/en-US
N.B. v. Sweden
N.B. v. Sweden CCPR/C/25/D/175/1984 Communication number s : 175/1984 Author: N.B. name deleted Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 25 Country Sweden Submission date 21 Mar 1984 Date of decision 11 Jul 1985 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/25/D/175/1984https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/420/en-US
Natalya Pinchuk v. Belarus
Natalya Pinchuk v. Belarus CCPR/C/112/D/2165/2012 Communication number s : 2165/2012 Author: Natalya Pinchuk represented by counsel Antoine Bernard Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 112 Country Belarus Submission date 12 Apr 2012 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/112/D/2165/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1938/en-US
Nguyen v. Netherlands
Nguyen v. Netherlands CEDAW/C/36/D/3/2004 Communication number s : 003/2004 Author: Dung Thi Thuy Nguyen Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 36 Country Netherlands Submission date 08 Dec 2003 Date of decision 14 Aug 2006 Comment: Under rule 60 JUTBCEDAW/C/36/D/3/2004https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1717/en-US
Nirmal Singh v. Canada
Nirmal Singh v. Canada CAT/C/46/D/319/2007 Communication number s : 319/2007 Author: Nirmal Singh Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 46 Country Canada Submission date 20 Jun 2007 Date of decision 30 May 2011 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/46/D/319/2007https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/60/en-US
O'KEEFFE v. Ireland
O KEEFFE v. Ireland IRL 28/01/2014 00:00:00 26/10/2016 16:50:41 Case Description: The case concerns the responsibility of the Irish State for the sexual abuse of the applicant aged nine by a lay teacher LH in a National School in 1973. A prior complaint EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1946