Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 889
2nd RC4 Spain
2nd RC4 Spain ESP 2021 03 25 2021 09 30 I. INTRODUCTION The Fourth Round Evaluation Report on Spain was adopted at GRECO s 62nd Plenary Meeting 6 December 2013 and made public on 15 January 2014 following authorisation by Spain. The Fourth Evaluation GRECOGrecoRC4(2021)3-Final-eng-Spain-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=GrecoRC4(2021)3-Final-eng-Spain-PUBLIC
5th Round Evaluation Report on Poland
5th Round Evaluation Report on Poland POL 2018 12 07 2019 01 28 Adoption: 7 December 2018 Publication: 28 January 2019 Public GrecoEval5Rep 2018 1 FIFTH EVALUATION ROUND Preventing corruption and promoting integrity in central governments top executive GRECOGrecoEval5Rep(2018)1-Final-eng-Poland-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=GrecoEval5Rep(2018)1-Final-eng-Poland-PUBLIC
A.H.G. v. Canada
A.H.G. v. Canada CCPR/C/113/D/2091/2011 Communication number s : 2091/2011 Author: A.H.G. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 113 Country Canada Submission date 28 Aug 2011 Date of decision 25 Mar 2015 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/113/D/2091/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1926/en-US
AL NASHIRI v. Poland
AL NASHIRI v. Poland POL 16/02/2015 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: The cases concern the violation of a number of Convention rights arising from the fact that the applicants were victims of a secret rendition operation involving their EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20624
AMIE AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria
AMIE AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria BGR 12/05/2013 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention pending expulsion and deportation and of family life: Shortcomings of the judicial review in respect of the expulsion of foreign EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3939
ANNUAL REPORT OF THE WORKING GROUP ON THE USE OF MERCENARIES AS A MEANS OF VIOLATING HUMAN RIGHTS AND IMPEDING THE EXERCISE OF THE RIGHT OF PEOPLES TO SELF-DETERMINATION ADDENDUM : MISSION TO HONDURAS
ANNUAL REPORT OF THE WORKING GROUP ON THE USE OF MERCENARIES AS A MEANS OF VIOLATING HUMAN RIGHTS AND IMPEDING THE EXERCISE OF THE RIGHT OF PEOPLES TO SELF DETERMINATION ADDENDUM : MISSION TO HONDURAS A/HRC/24/45/Add.1 NULL 2013 08 05T00:00:00 WG UHRIA/HRC/24/45/Add.1https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/3da0110e-6a50-4290-bd4f-20e5594b1e7b
Alakuş v. Türkiye
Alaku v. T rkiye CCPR/C/135/D/3736/2020 Communication number s : 3736/2020 Author: Mukadder Alaku Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 135 Country T rkiye Submission date 23 Dec 2019 Date of decision 26 Jul 2022 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/135/D/3736/2020https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3737/en-US
Althammer et al. (2) v. Austria
Althammer et al. 2 v. Austria CCPR/C/78/D/998/2001 Communication number s : 998/2001 Author: Rupert Althammer et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 78 Country Austria Submission date 22 Apr 1998 Date of decision 08 Aug 2003 Comment: An JUTBCCPR/C/78/D/998/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1054/en-US
Amanda Jane Mellet v. Ireland
Amanda Jane Mellet v. Ireland CCPR/C/116/D/2324/2013 Communication number s : 2324/2013 Author: Amanda Jane Mellet Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 116 Country Ireland Submission date 11 Nov 2013 Date of decision 31 Mar 2016 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/116/D/2324/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2152/en-US
Anne Nuorgam et al. v. Finland
Anne Nuorgam et al. v. Finland CERD/C/106/D/59/2016 Communication number s : 59/2016 Author: Anne Nuorgam et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 106 Country Finland Submission date 14 Mar 2016 Date of decision 22 Apr 2022 Comment: This JUTBCERD/C/106/D/59/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3745/en-US
Assenova Naidenova et al. v. Bulgaria
Assenova Naidenova et al. v. Bulgaria CCPR/C/106/D/2073/2011 Communication number s : 2073/2011 Author: Liliana Assenova Naidenova et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 106 Country Bulgaria Submission date 25 Jun 2011 Date of decision 30 JUTBCCPR/C/106/D/2073/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1464/en-US
BIG BROTHER WATCH AND OTHERS v. the United Kingdom
BIG BROTHER WATCH AND OTHERS v. the United Kingdom GBR 25/05/2021 00:00:00 28/05/2021 14:53:04 Case Description: The case concerns certain shortcomings in the secret surveillance regime including bulk interception and obtaining communications data from EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57685
Bacher v. Austria
Bacher v. Austria CRPD/C/19/D/26/2014 Communication number s : 026/2014 Author: Viktoria Bacher Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 20 Country Austria Submission date 08 Feb 2014 Date of decision 16 Feb 2018 Comment: This document has no JUTBCRPD/C/19/D/26/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2394/en-US
Bagale v. Nepal
Bagale v. Nepal CCPR/C/130/D/2777/2016 Communication number s : 2777/2016 Author: Hom Bahadur Bagale Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 130 Country Nepal Submission date 17 Dec 2015 Date of decision 02 Nov 2020 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/130/D/2777/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3277/en-US
Baranovs v. Latvia
Baranovs v. Latvia CCPR/C/133/D/3021/2017 Communication number s : 3021/2017 Author: Ivans Baranovs Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 133 Country Latvia Submission date 06 Sep 2017 Date of decision 18 Oct 2021 Comment: Individual opinion by JUTBCCPR/C/133/D/3021/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3167/en-US
Bessis v. France
Bessis v. France CCPR/C/133/D/3215/2018 Communication number s : 3215/2018 Author: Philippe Rudyard Bessis Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 133 Country France Submission date 26 Oct 2017 Date of decision 13 Oct 2021 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/133/D/3215/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3114/en-US
Bulgakov v. Ukraine
Bulgakov v. Ukraine CCPR/C/106/D/1803/2008 Communication number s : 1803/2008 Author: Dmitriy Vladimirovich Bulgakov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 106 Country Ukraine Submission date 23 May 2008 Date of decision 29 Oct 2012 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/106/D/1803/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1270/en-US
CASE OF A AND B v. GEORGIA
CASE OF A AND B v. GEORGIA 73975/16 DEKANOSIDZE T. ABAZADZE T. JOMARJIDZE N. ARGANASHVILI A. ABASHIDZE A. LEACH P. LEVIN K. EVANS J. GAVRON J. GEO 2/10/2022 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed Art. 34 Individual applications ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0210JUD007397516https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-215716
CASE OF A. AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF A. AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 3455/05 BIRNBERG PIERCE AND PARTNERS GBR 2/19/2009 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 3 No violation of Art. 13 3 Preliminary objection rejected Government not precluded from raising defence under Art. 5 1 f or ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0219JUD000345505https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-91403
CASE OF A.B. v. RUSSIA
CASE OF A.B. v. RUSSIA 1439/06 BELINSKAYA M. RUS 10/14/2010 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Violations of Art. 3 substantive aspect Violation of Art. 5 1 Non pecuniary damage award Article 109 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 350 90 193 448 220 216 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1014JUD000143906https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-100964