Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 41 - 60 of 1639
BRAGADIREANU v. Romania
BRAGADIREANU v. Romania ROU 06/03/2008 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: This group currently consisting of 121 judgments 1 mainly concerns the inhuman and/or degrading treatment suffered by the applicants due to overcrowding and poor EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12985
Bahadur Maharjan v. Nepal
Bahadur Maharjan v. Nepal CCPR/C/105/D/1863/2009 Communication number s : 1863/2009 Author: Dev Bahadur Maharjan Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 105 Country Nepal Submission date 31 Dec 2008 Date of decision 19 Jul 2012 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/105/D/1863/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1238/en-US
Bakhtiyari v. Australia
Bakhtiyari v. Australia CCPR/C/79/D/1069/2002 Communication number s : 1069/2002 Author: Ali Aqsar Bakhtiyari and Roqaiha Bakhtiyari Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 79 Country Australia Submission date 25 Mar 2002 Date of decision 29 Oct JUTBCCPR/C/79/D/1069/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1092/en-US
Basem Ahmed Issa Yassin et. al. v. Canada
Basem Ahmed Issa Yassin et. al. v. Canada CCPR/C/120/D/2285/2013 Communication number s : 2285/2013 Author: Basem Ahmed Issa Yassin et. al. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 120 Country Canada Submission date 28 Feb 2013 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/120/D/2285/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2316/en-US
Benon Pjetri v. Switzerland
Benon Pjetri v. Switzerland CERD/C/91/D/53/2013 Communication number s : 053/2013 Author: Benon Pjetri Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 91 Country Switzerland Submission date 12 Dec 2012 Date of decision 05 Dec 2016 Comment: Opinion non JUTBCERD/C/91/D/53/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2186/en-US
Berhane v. Switzerland
Berhane v. Switzerland CAT/C/73/D/872/2018 Communication number s : 872/2018 Author: Yacob Berhane Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 73 Country Switzerland Submission date 16 May 2018 Date of decision 28 Apr 2022 Comment: This document has JUTBCAT/C/73/D/872/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3138/en-US
Brada v. France
Brada v. France CAT/C/34/D/195/2002 Communication number s : 195/2002 Author: Mafhoud Brada Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 34 Country France Submission date 29 Nov 2001 Date of decision 17 May 2005 Comment: HR/CAT/PUB/1 p. 146 Substantive JUTBCAT/C/34/D/195/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/137/en-US
Brun v. France
Brun v. France CCPR/C/88/D/1453/2006 Communication number s : 1453/2006 Author: Andr Brun Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 88 Country France Submission date 15 Nov 2005 Date of decision 18 Oct 2006 Comment: Pursuant to rule 90 of the JUTBCCPR/C/88/D/1453/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1319/en-US
C.A.R.M. et al. v. Canada
C.A.R.M. et al. v. Canada CAT/C/38/D/298/2006 Communication number s : 298/2006 Author: C.A.R.M. et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 38 Country Canada Submission date 26 Jun 2006 Date of decision 18 May 2007 Comment: This document has JUTBCAT/C/38/D/298/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/92/en-US
C.F.T. v. Switzerland
C.F.T. v. Switzerland CAT/C/66/D/829/2017 Communication number s : 829/2017 Author: C.F.T. represented by counsel Coordination Asyle Migration Riviera Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 66 Country Switzerland Submission date 05 Jun 2017 Date JUTBCAT/C/66/D/829/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2588/en-US
C.G. AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria
C.G. AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria BGR 24/07/2008 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: The cases C.G. and Others Kurilovich and Others M. and Others and Bou Hassoun concern shortcomings in the procedure for judicial review of decisions to expel foreign EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3769
C.Y. v. Denmark
C.Y. v. Denmark CAT/C/63/D/647/2014 Communication number s : 647/2014 Author: C.Y. represented by counsel Niels Erik Hansen Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 63 Country Denmark Submission date 17 Dec 2014 Date of decision 17 May 2018 JUTBCAT/C/63/D/647/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2741/en-US
C. v. Australia
C. v. Australia CCPR/C/76/D/900/1999 Communication number s : 900/1999 Author: C. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 76 Country Australia Submission date 23 Nov 1999 Date of decision 28 Oct 2002 Comment: Under rule 85 of the Committee s rules JUTBCCPR/C/76/D/900/1999https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1026/en-US
CASE OF A.A. AND OTHERS v. NORTH MACEDONIA
CASE OF A.A. AND OTHERS v. NORTH MACEDONIA 55798/16 55808/16 55817/16 55820/16 55823/16 GERICKE C. MKD 4/5/2022 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 34 Individual applications Art. 34 Victim Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 35 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0405JUD005579816https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-216861
CASE OF A.A. v. RUSSIA
CASE OF A.A. v. RUSSIA 49097/08 N/A RUS 1/17/2012 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Degrading treatment Inhuman treatment Substantive aspect Violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Effective investigation ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0117JUD004909708https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-108605
CASE OF A.A. v. SWITZERLAND
CASE OF A.A. v. SWITZERLAND 58802/12 MOTZ S. HASSAN T. CHE 1/7/2014 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 13 3 Right to an effective remedy Article 13 Effective remedy Article 3 Prohibition of torture Expulsion 350 620 444 110 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0107JUD005880212https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-139903
CASE OF A AND B v. CROATIA
CASE OF A AND B v. CROATIA 7144/15 BOJIC I. VRANJICAN DEREK T. DRENSKI LASAN V. HRV 6/20/2019 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Effective investigation Procedural aspect No violation of Article 8 Right to respect for ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0620JUD000714415https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-194217
CASE OF A AND B v. NORWAY
CASE OF A AND B v. NORWAY 24130/11 29758/11 KJELDAHL R. NOR 11/15/2016 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 Right not to be tried or punished twice general Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 Right not to be tried or punished twice Criminal ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1115JUD002413011https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-168972
CASE OF A. AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF A. AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 3455/05 BIRNBERG PIERCE AND PARTNERS GBR 2/19/2009 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 3 No violation of Art. 13 3 Preliminary objection rejected Government not precluded from raising defence under Art. 5 1 f or ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0219JUD000345505https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-91403
CASE OF A, B AND C v. IRELAND
CASE OF A B AND C v. IRELAND 25579/05 KAY J. IRL 12/16/2010 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed non exhaustion of domestic remedies Remainder inadmissible No violation of Art. 8 Violation of Art. 8 Non pecuniary damage award ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1216JUD002557905https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-102332