Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 41
B.S.S. v. Canada
B.S.S. v. Canada CAT/C/32/D/183/2001 Communication number s : 183/2001 Author: B.S.S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 32 Country Canada Submission date 07 Mar 2001 Date of decision 12 May 2004 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/32/D/183/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/149/en-US
CASE OF AL-SKEINI AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF AL SKEINI AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 55721/07 PUBLIC INTEREST LAWYERS GBR 7/7/2011 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objections dismissed estoppel non exhaustion of domestic remedies Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed lack of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0707JUD005572107https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-105606
CASE OF BEVACQUA AND S. v. BULGARIA
CASE OF BEVACQUA AND S. v. BULGARIA 71127/01 GORBOUNOVA D. TISHEVA G. BGR 6/12/2008 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 8 No violation of Art. 6 1 Non pecuniary damage award Child Protection Act 2000 Protection Against Domestic Violence Act 2005 Article 217a of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0612JUD007112701https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-86875
CASE OF ÖCALAN v. TURKEY (No. 2) [Extracts]
CASE OF CALAN v. TURKEY No. 2 Extracts 24069/03 197/04 6201/06 10464/07 OTTY T. MULLER M. TUGLUK A. ERBAS D. DUNDAR I. KAPLAN H. TEPE M. KOSTAK F. AYDINKAYA F. GUNES O. BILMEZ I. KAYA B. TUR S. EMEKCI E. BILGIC K. KORKUT H. SAKAR M. YALCINDAG R. BULGAN N. ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0318JUD002406903https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-142087
CASE OF CENTRE FOR LEGAL RESOURCES ON BEHALF OF VALENTIN CÂMPEANU v. ROMANIA
CASE OF CENTRE FOR LEGAL RESOURCES ON BEHALF OF VALENTIN C MPEANU v. ROMANIA 47848/08 COJOCARIU C. ROU 7/17/2014 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Article 34 Locus standi Violation of Article 2 Right to life Article 2 Positive obligations ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0717JUD004784808https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-145577
CASE OF CHIRAGOV AND OTHERS v. ARMENIA
CASE OF CHIRAGOV AND OTHERS v. ARMENIA 13216/05 MULLER M. VINE C. BUTLER M. IVERS M. POYNOR B. SWAROOP S. YILDIZ K. ARM 6/16/2015 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objections dismissed Article 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Article 35 3 Ratione loci ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0616JUD001321605https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-155353
CASE OF FEDOTOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
CASE OF FEDOTOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA 40792/10 30538/14 43439/14 GNEZDILOVA O.A. RUS 1/17/2023 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 34 Individual applications Art. 34 Victim Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0117JUD004079210https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-222750
CASE OF GARIB v. THE NETHERLANDS
CASE OF GARIB v. THE NETHERLANDS 43494/09 WIJLING R.S. NLD 11/6/2017 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 2 of Protocol No. 4 Freedom of movement general Article 2 para. 1 of Protocol No. 4 Freedom to choose residence Sections 5 2 6 2 7 1 b and 17 of the ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1106JUD004349409https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-177406
CASE OF JANOWIEC AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
CASE OF JANOWIEC AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA 55508/07 29520/09 SZEWCZYK J. KAMINSKI I. NOWOSIELSKI R. SOCHANSKI B. KARPINSKIY R. STAVITSKAYA A. RUS 10/21/2013 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection allowed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Ratione temporis ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1021JUD005550807https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-127684
CASE OF KHLAIFIA AND OTHERS v. ITALY
CASE OF KHLAIFIA AND OTHERS v. ITALY 16483/12 MASERA L.M. ZIRULIA S. ITA 12/15/2016 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 5 Right to liberty and security Article 5 1 Lawful arrest or detention Article 5 1 f Expulsion Violation of Article 5 Right to liberty and ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1215JUD001648312https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-170054
CASE OF KURT v. TURKEY
CASE OF KURT v. TURKEY 24276/94 N/A TUR 5/25/1998 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection rejected Not necessary to examine Art. 2 Not necessary to examine Art. 3 complaint in respect of applicant s son Violation of Art. 5 Violation of Art. 3 Violation of Art. ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0525JUD002427694https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58198
CASE OF OLIARI AND OTHERS v. ITALY
CASE OF OLIARI AND OTHERS v. ITALY 18766/11 36030/11 SCHUSTER A. D AMICO M. CLARA M. PITEA C. ITA 7/21/2015 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 Positive obligations Article 8 1 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0721JUD001876611https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-156265
CASE OF OPUZ v. TURKEY
CASE OF OPUZ v. TURKEY 33401/02 BESTAS M. TUR 6/9/2009 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed six month period Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed non exhaustion of domestic remedies Violation of Art. 2 Violation of Art. 3 Violation ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0609JUD003340102https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-92945
CASE OF RODRIGUES DA SILVA AND HOOGKAMER v. THE NETHERLANDS
CASE OF RODRIGUES DA SILVA AND HOOGKAMER v. THE NETHERLANDS 50435/99 VAN ATTEN G. NLD 1/31/2006 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 8 Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Costs and expenses award domestic proceedings Aliens Act 1965 Aliens Act ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0131JUD005043599https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-72205
CASE OF TADDEUCCI AND McCALL v. ITALY
CASE OF TADDEUCCI AND McCALL v. ITALY 51362/09 WINTEMUTE R.W. ITA 6/30/2016 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 14 8 1 Prohibition of discrimination Article 14 Discrimination Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0630JUD005136209https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-164715
CASE OF VALIULIENĖ v. LITHUANIA
CASE OF VALIULIEN v. LITHUANIA 33234/07 MICKEVICIUS H. LTU 3/26/2013 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Positive obligations Substantive aspect Non pecuniary damage award Article 116 of the old Criminal Code Article 140 1 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0326JUD003323407https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-117636
Doolan v. Australia
Doolan v. Australia CRPD/C/22/D/18/2013 Communication number s : 18/2013 Author: Manuway Doolan Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 22 Country Australia Submission date 19 Sep 2013 Date of decision 30 Aug 2019 Comment: This document has no JUTBCRPD/C/22/D/18/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3135/en-US
Government comments on the fifth report on Portugal
Government comments on the fifth report on Portugal PRT 2018 06 19 2018 10 02 APPENDIX: GOVERNMENT S VIEWPOINT The following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in Portugal ECRI in accordance with its ECRIPRT-COM-V-2018-035-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=PRT-COM-V-2018-035-ENG
Independent Expert on the question of human rights and extreme poverty
Report to HRC E/CN.4/2006/43/Add.1 from 23 October 2005 to 8 November 2005 27 March 2006 Independent Expert on the question of human rights and extreme poverty United States of America UNITED NATIONS E Economic and Social Distr. GENERAL Council UNSPE/CN.4/2006/43/Add.1https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=E%2fCN.4%2f2006%2f43%2fAdd.1&Lang=en
Lee and 388 others v. Republic of Korea
Lee and 388 others v. Republic of Korea CCPR/C/130/D/2776/2016 Communication number s : 2776/2016 Author: Jung Hee Lee and 388 others Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 130 Country Republic of Korea Submission date 11 Dec 2015 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/130/D/2776/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3288/en-US