Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 9381 - 9400 of 9751
T.D.J. v. Denmark
T.D.J. v. Denmark CCPR/C/127/D/2654/2015 Communication number s : 2654/2015 Author: T.D.J. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 127 Country Denmark Submission date 05 Oct 2015 Date of decision 08 Nov 2019 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/127/D/2654/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2813/en-US
T.D. v. Switzerland
T.D. v. Switzerland CAT/C/46/D/375/2009 Communication number s : 375/2009 Author: T.D. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 46 Country Switzerland Submission date 10 Mar 2009 Date of decision 26 May 2011 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/46/D/375/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/57/en-US
T.I. v. Canada,Uzbekistan
T.I. v. Canada Uzbekistan CAT/C/45/D/333/2007 Communication number s : 333/2007 Author: T.I. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 45 Country Canada Uzbekistan Submission date 15 Sep 2007 Date of decision 15 Nov 2010 Comment: This document has JUTBCAT/C/45/D/333/2007https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/62/en-US
T.K.T. v. Switzerland
T.K.T. v. Switzerland CAT/C/71/D/866/2018 Communication number s : 866/2018 Author: T.K.T. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 71 Country Switzerland Submission date 16 Mar 2018 Date of decision 19 Jul 2021 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/71/D/866/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3373/en-US
T.L.N. v. Norway
T.L.N. v. Norway CCPR/C/111/D/1942/2010 Communication number s : 1942/2010 Author: T.L.N. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 111 Country Norway Submission date 11 Dec 2009 Date of decision 16 Jul 2014 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/111/D/1942/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1847/en-US
T. M. and Z. I v. Uzbekistan
T. M. and Z. I v. Uzbekistan CCPR/C/98/D/1206/2003 Communication number s : 1206/2003 Author: T. M. and Z. I Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 98 Country Uzbekistan Submission date 13 Oct 2003 Date of decision 10 Mar 2010 Comment: Under rule JUTBCCPR/C/98/D/1206/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1551/en-US
T.M. v. Greece
T.M. v. Greece CRPD/C/21/D/42/2017 Communication number s : 042/2017 Author: T.M. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 21 Country Greece Submission date 21 Mar 2017 Date of decision 02 Apr 2019 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCRPD/C/21/D/42/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2516/en-US
T. M. v. Republic of Korea
T. M. v. Republic of Korea CAT/C/53/D/519/2012 Communication number s : 519/2012 Author: T. M. represented by counsel Jae Chang Oh Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 53 Country Republic of Korea Submission date 24 Apr 2012 Date of decision 21 JUTBCAT/C/53/D/519/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2059/en-US
T.M. v. Sweden
T.M. v. Sweden CAT/C/31/D/228/2003 Communication number s : 228/2003 Author: T.M. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 31 Country Sweden Submission date 06 Mar 2003 Date of decision 18 Nov 2003 Comment: Committee member Mr. Fernando Mari o Men JUTBCAT/C/31/D/228/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/154/en-US
T.M. v. Sweden
T.M. v. Sweden CAT/C/68/D/860/2018 Communication number s : 860/2018 Author: T.M. represented by counsel Daniel Carnestedt Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 68 Country Sweden Submission date 21 Jan 2018 Date of decision 06 Dec 2019 Comment: JUTBCAT/C/68/D/860/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2702/en-US
T.N. v. Denmark
T.N. v. Denmark CEDAW/C/59/D/37/2012 Communication number s : 037/2012 Author: T.N. represented by counsel Tyge Trier Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 59 Country Denmark Submission date 19 Sep 2011 Date of decision 03 Nov 2014 JUTBCEDAW/C/59/D/37/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1880/en-US
T.S. v. Netherlands
T.S. v. Netherlands CAT/C/71/D/896/2018 Communication number s : 896/2018 Author: T.S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 71 Country Netherlands Submission date 02 Nov 2018 Date of decision 19 Jul 2021 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/71/D/896/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3374/en-US
T.S. v. Russian Federation
T.S. v. Russian Federation CEDAW/C/66/D/69/2014 Communication number s : 69/2014 Author: T.S. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 66 Country Russian Federation Submission date 07 May 2014 Date of decision 28 Feb 2017 Comment: This JUTBCEDAW/C/66/D/69/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3448/en-US
T.V. and A.G. v. Uzbekistan
T.V. and A.G. v. Uzbekistan CCPR/C/116/D/2044/2011 Communication number s : 2044/2011 Author: T.V. and A.G. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 116 Country Uzbekistan Submission date 16 Feb 2009 Date of decision 11 Mar 2016 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/116/D/2044/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2101/en-US
T.W.M.B. v. Netherlands
T.W.M.B. v. Netherlands CCPR/C/43/D/403/1990 Communication number s : 403/1990 Author: T.W.M.B. name deleted Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 43 Country Netherlands Submission date 11 Apr 1990 Date of decision 07 Nov 1991 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/43/D/403/1990https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/606/en-US
T.W. and G.M. v. Slovakia
T.W. and G.M. v. Slovakia CCPR/C/110/D/1963/2010 Communication number s : 1963/2010 Author: T.W. and G.M. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 110 Country Slovakia Submission date 23 Feb 2009 Date of decision 25 Mar 2014 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/110/D/1963/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1812/en-US
T v. New Zealand
T v. New Zealand CCPR/C/125/D/2684/2015 Communication number s : 2684/2015 Author: T Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 125 Country New Zealand Submission date 02 Jun 2015 Date of decision 29 Mar 2019 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/125/D/2684/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3316/en-US
TCHOKHONELIDZE v. Georgia
TCHOKHONELIDZE v. Georgia GEO 28/09/2018 00:00:00 10/10/2018 10:41:00 Case Description: The case concerns the alleged police entrapment of the applicant a senior regional government official at the material time. Following an undercover police operation EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50349
TURKMENISTAN: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
TURKMENISTAN: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CCPR/C/TKM/CO/2 NULL 2017 04 20T00:00:00 CCPR United Nations CCPR/C/TKM/CO/2 International Covenant on Distr.: General 20 April 2017 Civil and Political Rights Original: English Human Rights Committee Concluding UHRICCPR/C/TKM/CO/2https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/b779aa9a-855e-4456-9133-f1d672f7ae90
TYSIAC v. Poland
TYSIAC v. Poland POL 24/09/2007 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: These three cases concern the lack of effective access to lawful abortion in Poland. The Tysi c and R.R. cases concern the lack of effective procedural mechanisms to enable the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20592