Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 805
A.B. v. Canada
A.B. v. Canada CCPR/C/117/D/2387/2014 Communication number s : 2387/2014 Author: A.B. represented by counsel Laura Brittain then Benjamin Liston Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 117 Country Canada Submission date 29 Apr 2014 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/117/D/2387/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2197/en-US
A.P. v. Russian Federation
A.P. v. Russian Federation CCPR/C/107/D/1857/2008 Communication number s : 1857/2008 Author: A.P. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 107 Country Russian Federation Submission date 20 May 2008 Date of decision 28 Mar 2013 Comment: The JUTBCCPR/C/107/D/1857/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1326/en-US
A.R. v. Netherlands
A.R. v. Netherlands CAT/C/31/D/203/2002 Communication number s : 203/2002 Author: A.R. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 31 Country Netherlands Submission date 14 Mar 2002 Date of decision 14 Nov 2003 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/31/D/203/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/159/en-US
ALPARSLAN ALTAN v. Turkey
ALPARSLAN ALTAN v. Turkey TUR 09/09/2019 00:00:00 25/09/2019 10:40:24 Case Description: The Alparslan Altan group of cases concerns violations of the right to liberty and security in the immediate aftermath of the coup attempt on 15 July 2016 due to the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52779
Adyrkhayev et al. v. Tajikistan
Adyrkhayev et al. v. Tajikistan CCPR/C/135/D/2483/2014 Communication number s : 2483/2014 Author: Vladimir Adyrkhayev Behruz Solikhov and the Religious Association of Jehovah s Witnesses in Dushanb Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 135 JUTBCCPR/C/135/D/2483/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3555/en-US
Alakuş v. Türkiye
Alaku v. T rkiye CCPR/C/135/D/3736/2020 Communication number s : 3736/2020 Author: Mukadder Alaku Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 135 Country T rkiye Submission date 23 Dec 2019 Date of decision 26 Jul 2022 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/135/D/3736/2020https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3737/en-US
Ali and Ali v. Norway
Ali and Ali v. Norway CCPR/C/135/D/2926/2017 Communication number s : 2926/2017 Author: Imran Ali and Bakhtaware Ali Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 135 Country Norway Submission date 04 Jan 2017 Date of decision 14 Jul 2022 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/135/D/2926/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3677/en-US
Ashby v. Trinidad and Tobago
Ashby v. Trinidad and Tobago CCPR/C/74/D/580/1994 Communication number s : 580/1994 Author: Glenn Ashby Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 74 Country Trinidad and Tobago Submission date 06 Jul 1994 Date of decision 21 Mar 2002 Comment: Under JUTBCCPR/C/74/D/580/1994https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/951/en-US
B.H. v. Austria
B.H. v. Austria CCPR/C/119/D/2088/2011 Communication number s : 2088/2011 Author: B.H. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 119 Country Austria Submission date 14 Feb 2005 Date of decision 28 Mar 2017 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/119/D/2088/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2257/en-US
B.N.T.K. v. Sweden
B.N.T.K. v. Sweden CAT/C/64/D/641/2014 Communication number s : 641/2014 Author: B.N.T.K. represented by counsel Mai Greitz Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 64 Country Sweden Submission date 01 Dec 2014 Date of decision 09 Aug 2018 Comment: JUTBCAT/C/64/D/641/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2456/en-US
B.W.M.Z. v. Netherlands
B.W.M.Z. v. Netherlands CCPR/C/107/D/1788/2008 Communication number s : 1788/2008 Author: B.W.M.Z. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 107 Country Netherlands Submission date 26 Jun 2007 Date of decision 25 Mar 2013 Comment: Pursuant to JUTBCCPR/C/107/D/1788/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1331/en-US
BULGARIAN ORTHODOX OLD CALENDAR CHURCH AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria
BULGARIAN ORTHODOX OLD CALENDAR CHURCH AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria BGR 20/04/2021 00:00:00 23/04/2021 09:38:23 Case Description: These cases concern unjustified judicial refusals in 2013 and 2014 to register two Orthodox churches on the ground that they had EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57381
Bakhtiyari v. Australia
Bakhtiyari v. Australia CCPR/C/79/D/1069/2002 Communication number s : 1069/2002 Author: Ali Aqsar Bakhtiyari and Roqaiha Bakhtiyari Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 79 Country Australia Submission date 25 Mar 2002 Date of decision 29 Oct JUTBCCPR/C/79/D/1069/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1092/en-US
Bandajevsky v. Belarus
Bandajevsky v. Belarus CCPR/C/86/D/1100/2002 Communication number s : 1100/2002 Author: Yuri Bandajevsky Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 86 Country Belarus Submission date 19 Apr 2002 Date of decision 28 Mar 2006 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/86/D/1100/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1248/en-US
Baumgarten v. Germany
Baumgarten v. Germany CCPR/C/78/D/960/2000 Communication number s : 960/2000 Author: Klaus Dieter Baumgarten Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 78 Country Germany Submission date 30 Sep 1998 Date of decision 31 Jul 2003 Comment: The Covenant JUTBCCPR/C/78/D/960/2000https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1061/en-US
Buckle v. New Zealand
Buckle v. New Zealand CCPR/C/70/D/858/1999 Communication number s : 858/1999 Author: Margaret Buckle Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 70 Country New Zealand Submission date 21 Sep 1998 Date of decision 25 Oct 2000 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/70/D/858/1999https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/905/en-US
CASE OF A. AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF A. AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 3455/05 BIRNBERG PIERCE AND PARTNERS GBR 2/19/2009 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 3 No violation of Art. 13 3 Preliminary objection rejected Government not precluded from raising defence under Art. 5 1 f or ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0219JUD000345505https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-91403
CASE OF A.B.V. v. RUSSIA
CASE OF A.B.V. v. RUSSIA 56987/15 THREEFOLD LEGAL ADVISORS LLC RUS 10/2/2018 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 Positive obligations Article 8 1 Respect for family life 451 634 425 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1002JUD005698715https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-186439
CASE OF A.G.A.M. v. SWEDEN
CASE OF A.G.A.M. v. SWEDEN 71680/10 NORBERG N. SWE 6/27/2013 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Expulsion Substantive aspect Conditional Iraq 350 620 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0627JUD007168010 FIFTH SECTION CASE OF A.G.A.M. v. ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0627JUD007168010https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-121571
CASE OF A.G.R. v. THE NETHERLANDS
CASE OF A.G.R. v. THE NETHERLANDS 13442/08 KESSELS A. NLD 1/12/2016 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Expulsion Conditional Afghanistan 350 620 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0112JUD001344208 THIRD SECTION CASE OF A.G.R. v. THE ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0112JUD001344208https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-159883