Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 3301 - 3320 of 3600
Fourth Opinion on “the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia”
Fourth Opinion on the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia MKDMDN ACFC/OP/IV 2016 001 2016 02 24 ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES Strasbourg 20 December 2016 ACFC/OP/IV 2016 001 Fourth Opinion on FCNMACFC/OP/IV(2016)001https://hudoc.fcnm.coe.int/eng?i=4th_OP_FYROM_en
Fourth report on Romania
Fourth report on Romania ROU 2014 03 19 2014 06 03 CRI 2014 19 ECRI REPORT ON Romania fourth monitoring cycle Adopted on 19 March 2014 Published on 3 June 2014 ECRI Secretariat Directorate General II Democracy Council of Europe F 67075 STRASBOURG Cedex ECRIROU-CbC-IV-2014-019-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=ROU-CbC-IV-2014-019-ENG
Franck Kitenge Baruani v. Democratic Republic of the Congo
Franck Kitenge Baruani v. Democratic Republic of the Congo CCPR/C/110/D/1890/2009 Communication number s : 1890/2009 Author: Franck Kitenge Baruani represented by Anna Copeland SCALES Community Legal Centre Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No JUTBCCPR/C/110/D/1890/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1804/en-US
G.E. v. Germany
G.E. v. Germany CCPR/C/104/D/1789/2008 Communication number s : 1789/2008 Author: G.E. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 104 Country Germany Submission date 17 Mar 2008 Date of decision 26 Mar 2012 Comment: The texts of two individual JUTBCCPR/C/104/D/1789/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1441/en-US
G.H. v. Hungary
G.H. v. Hungary CEDAW/C/76/D/114/2017 Communication number s : 114/2017 Author: G.H. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 76 Country Hungary Submission date 23 Feb 2017 Date of decision 06 Jul 2020 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/76/D/114/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3037/en-US
G.I. v. Greece
G.I. v. Greece CCPR/C/126/D/2582/2015 Communication number s : 2582/2015 Author: G.I. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 126 Country Greece Submission date 26 Jan 2015 Date of decision 25 Jul 2019 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/126/D/2582/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2898/en-US
G.J. v. Lithuania
G.J. v. Lithuania CCPR/C/110/D/1894/2009 Communication number s : 1894/2009 Author: G.J. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 110 Country Lithuania Submission date 26 Nov 2007 Date of decision 25 Mar 2014 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/110/D/1894/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1805/en-US
G. v. Australia
G. v. Australia CCPR/C/119/D/2172/2012 Communication number s : 2172/2012 Author: G. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 119 Country Australia Submission date 02 Dec 2011 Date of decision 17 Mar 2017 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/119/D/2172/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2220/en-US
GAFGAZ MAMMADOV v. Azerbaijan
GAFGAZ MAMMADOV v. Azerbaijan AZE 14/03/2016 00:00:00 26/10/2016 09:02:49 Case Description: This group concerns numerous breaches of the applicants freedom of assembly through the dispersal of unauthorised peaceful demonstrations not posing any threat to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1743
GRZEDA v. Poland
GRZEDA v. Poland POL 15/03/2022 00:00:00 17/03/2022 16:35:22 Case Description: The Reczkowicz group concerns infringements of the right to a tribunal established by law due to the fact that the judges of the various chambers in the Supreme Court SC EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-59933
Gatilov v. Russian Federation
Gatilov v. Russian Federation CCPR/C/120/D/2171/2012 Communication number s : 2171/2012 Author: Petr Gatilov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 120 Country Russian Federation Submission date 07 Apr 2011 Date of decision 13 Jul 2017 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/120/D/2171/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2310/en-US
Georgopoulos, Georgopoulou and their seven children v. Greece
Georgopoulos Georgopoulou and their seven children v. Greece CCPR/C/99/D/1799/2008 Communication number s : 1799/2008 Author: Antonios Georgopoulos Chrysafo Georgopoulou and their seven children Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 99 Country JUTBCCPR/C/99/D/1799/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1629/en-US
Gerasimov v. Kazakhstan
Gerasimov v. Kazakhstan CAT/C/48/D/433/2010 Communication number s : 433/2010 Author: Alexander Gerasimov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 48 Country Kazakhstan Submission date 22 Apr 2010 Date of decision 24 May 2012 Comment: The decision JUTBCAT/C/48/D/433/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/26/en-US
Gintaras Jagminas v. Lithuania
Gintaras Jagminas v. Lithuania CCPR/C/126/D/2670/2015 Communication number s : 2670/2015 Author: Gintaras Jagminas Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 126 Country Lithuania Submission date 05 Feb 2015 Date of decision 24 Jul 2019 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/126/D/2670/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2795/en-US
Goekce v. Austria
Goekce v. Austria CEDAW/C/39/D/5/2005 Communication number s : 005/2005 Author: Hakan Goekce Handan Goekce and Guelue Goekce descendants of the deceased Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 39 Country Austria Submission date 21 Jul 2004 Date of JUTBCEDAW/C/39/D/5/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1715/en-US
Government comments on the fourth report on Malta
Government comments on the fourth report on Malta MLT 2013 06 20 2013 10 15 APPENDIX: GOVERNMENT S VIEWPOINT The following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in Malta ECRI in accordance with its country ECRIMLT-COM-IV-2013-037-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=MLT-COM-IV-2013-037-ENG
Government comments on the third report on Austria
Government comments on the third report on Austria AUT 2004 06 25 2005 02 15 APPENDIX The following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in Austria ECRI wishes to point out that the analysis contained in ECRIAUT-COM-III-2005-001-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=AUT-COM-III-2005-001-ENG
Government comments on the third report on Cyprus
Government comments on the third report on Cyprus CYP 2005 12 16 2006 05 16 APPENDIX The following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in Cyprus ECRI wishes to point out that the analysis contained in its ECRICYP-COM-III-2006-017-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=CYP-COM-III-2006-017-ENG
Govsha, Syritsa and Mezyak v. Belarus
Govsha Syritsa and Mezyak v. Belarus CCPR/C/105/D/1790/2008 Communication number s : 1790/2008 Author: Sergei Govsha Viktor Syritsa and Viktor Mezyak Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 105 Country Belarus Submission date 31 Mar 2008 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/105/D/1790/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1246/en-US
Guillén Martínez v. Spain
Guill n Mart nez v. Spain CCPR/C/83/D/1092/2002 Communication number s : 1092/2002 Author: Josefa Guill n Mart nez Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 83 Country Spain Submission date 16 Jun 1999 Date of decision 29 Mar 2005 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/83/D/1092/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1171/en-US