Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 1121
4. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 4. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights New York 16 December 1966 Entry into force : 23 March 1976 in accordance with article 49 for all provisions except those of article 41 UNIV-4https://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-4&chapter=4&clang=_en
A.A.M. v. Sweden
A.A.M. v. Sweden CAT/C/48/D/413/2010 Communication number s : 413/2010 Author: A.A.M. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 48 Country Sweden Submission date 19 Feb 2010 Date of decision 23 May 2012 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/48/D/413/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/49/en-US
A.B.H. v. Denmark
A.B.H. v. Denmark CCPR/C/126/D/2603/2015 Communication number s : 2603/2015 Author: A.B.H. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 126 Country Denmark Submission date 28 Apr 2015 Date of decision 08 Jul 2019 Comment: An individual opinion by JUTBCCPR/C/126/D/2603/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2778/en-US
A.R.U. v. Netherlands
A.R.U. v. Netherlands CCPR/C/49/D/509/1992 Communication number s : 509/1992 Author: A.R.U. name deleted Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 49 Country Netherlands Submission date 21 Apr 1992 Date of decision 19 Oct 1993 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/49/D/509/1992https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/393/en-US
A.Sh. et al. v. Switzerland
A.Sh. et al. v. Switzerland CAT/C/63/D/717/2015 Communication number s : 717/2015 Author: A.Sh. et al. represented by counsel Angela Stettler Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 63 Country Switzerland Submission date 25 Nov 2015 Date of JUTBCAT/C/63/D/717/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2730/en-US
A.Y. v. Switzerland
A.Y. v. Switzerland CAT/C/74/D/887/2018 Communication number s : 887/2018 Author: A.Y. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 74 Country Switzerland Submission date 11 Oct 2018 Date of decision 22 Jul 2022 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/74/D/887/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3620/en-US
A.Y. v. Switzerland
A.Y. v. Switzerland CAT/C/74/D/887/2018 Communication number s : 887/2018 Author: A.Y. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 74 Country Switzerland Submission date 11 Oct 2018 Date of decision 22 Jul 2022 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/74/D/887/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3614/en-US
Aïcha Dehimi and Noura Ayache v. Algeria
A cha Dehimi and Noura Ayache v. Algeria CCPR/C/112/D/2086/2011 Communication number s : 2086/2011 Author: A cha Dehimi and Noura Ayache represented by Philippe Grant of Track Impunity Always TRIAL a Swiss association against impunity Type of decision: JUTBCCPR/C/112/D/2086/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1911/en-US
A v. Bosnia and Herzegovina
A v. Bosnia and Herzegovina CAT/C/67/D/854/2017 Communication number s : 854/2017 Author: A represented by counsel Philip Grant of TRIAL International Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 67 Country Bosnia and Herzegovina Submission date 01 Nov JUTBCAT/C/67/D/854/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2623/en-US
A. v. Canada
A. v. Canada CAT/C/57/D/583/2014 Communication number s : 583/2014 Author: A. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 57 Country Canada Submission date 16 Dec 2014 Date of decision 09 May 2016 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCAT/C/57/D/583/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2115/en-US
ALTUG TANER AKCAM v. Turkey
ALTUG TANER AKCAM v. Turkey TUR 25/01/2012 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:45:20 Case Description: These groups mainly concern unjustified and disproportionate interferences with the applicants freedom of expression on account of criminal proceedings for having EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37188
ARTUN AND GUVENER v. Turkey
ARTUN AND GUVENER v. Turkey TUR 26/09/2007 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:22:51 Case Description: These groups mainly concern unjustified and disproportionate interferences with the applicants freedom of expression on account of criminal proceedings for having EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37417
AVANESYAN v. Armenia
AVANESYAN v. Armenia ARM 20/10/2021 00:00:00 19/11/2021 15:34:10 Case Description: This case concerns the applicant s refusal to perform military service in 2014 because as a Jehovah s Witness his conscience did not allow him to serve in the army. The EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58877
Abbahah v. Morocco
Abbahah v. Morocco CAT/C/72/D/871/2018 Communication number s : 871/2018 Author: Sidi Abdallah Abbahah Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 72 Country Morocco Submission date 09 May 2018 Date of decision 24 Nov 2021 Comment: This document has JUTBCAT/C/72/D/871/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3120/en-US
Abbassi v. Algeria
Abbassi v. Algeria CCPR/C/89/D/1172/2003 Communication number s : 1172/2003 Author: Salim Abbassi Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 89 Country Algeria Submission date 31 Mar 2003 Date of decision 28 Mar 2007 Comment: Individual opinions JUTBCCPR/C/89/D/1172/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1354/en-US
Abdilafir Abubakar Ali and Mayul Ali Mohamad v. Denmark
Abdilafir Abubakar Ali and Mayul Ali Mohamad v. Denmark CCPR/C/116/D/2409/2014 Communication number s : 2409/2014 Author: Abdilafir Abubakar Ali and Mayul Ali Mohamad Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 116 Country Denmark Submission date Date JUTBCCPR/C/116/D/2409/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2134/en-US
Abdilafir Abubakar Ali and Mayul Ali Mohamad v. Denmark
Abdilafir Abubakar Ali and Mayul Ali Mohamad v. Denmark CCPR/C/116/D/2409/2014 Communication number s : 2409/2014 Author: Abdilafir Abubakar Ali and Mayul Ali Mohamad Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 116 Country Denmark Submission date 28 JUTBCCPR/C/116/D/2409/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2178/en-US
Additional Protocol to the Convention for the Protection of Individuals with regard to Automatic Processing of Personal Data, regarding supervisory authorities and transborder data flows (ETS No. 181)
Additional Protocol to the Convention for the Protection of Individuals with regard to Automatic Processing of Personal Data regarding supervisory authorities and transborder data flows ETS No. 181 181 Strasbourg 2001 11 08T00:00:00 Treaty open for COEETS No. 181https://rm.coe.int/1680080626
Additional Protocol to the European Convention on Extradition (ETS No. 086)
Additional Protocol to the European Convention on Extradition ETS No. 086 086 Strasbourg 1975 10 15T00:00:00 Treaty open for signature by the member States signatories to Treaty ETS 24 and for accession by the non member States which have acceded to COEETS No. 086https://rm.coe.int/1680076da5
Alonzo et al. v. Philippines
Alonzo et al. v. Philippines CEDAW/C/84/D/155/2020 Communication number s : 155/2020 Author: Natalia M. Alonzo Perla B. Balingit Virginia M. Bangit Francia A. Buco Dela Paz B. Culala Belen Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 84 Country JUTBCEDAW/C/84/D/155/2020https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3765/en-US