Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 1269
15. Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 15. Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities New York 13 December 2006 Entry into force : 3 May 2008 in accordance with article 45 1 . Registration : 3 May 2008 No. 44910 Status : UNIV-15https://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-15&chapter=4&clang=_en
A.A. v. Denmark
A.A. v. Denmark CAT/C/49/D/412/2010 Communication number s : 412/2010 Author: A.A. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 49 Country Denmark Submission date 30 Sep 2009 Date of decision 13 Nov 2012 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/49/D/412/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/23/en-US
A.B. v. Canada
A.B. v. Canada CCPR/C/117/D/2387/2014 Communication number s : 2387/2014 Author: A.B. represented by counsel Laura Brittain then Benjamin Liston Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 117 Country Canada Submission date 29 Apr 2014 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/117/D/2387/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2197/en-US
A.H.G. v. Canada
A.H.G. v. Canada CCPR/C/113/D/2091/2011 Communication number s : 2091/2011 Author: A.H.G. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 113 Country Canada Submission date 28 Aug 2011 Date of decision 25 Mar 2015 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/113/D/2091/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1926/en-US
A/HRC/47/9: Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review - Saint Lucia
United Nations A/HRC/47/9 General Assembly Distr.: General 14 April 2021 Original: English Human Rights Council Forty seventh session 21 June 9 July 2021 Agenda item 6 Universal periodic review Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review UPRA/HRC/47/9https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/country-reports/ahrc479-report-working-group-universal-periodic-review-saint-lucia
A.J. v. United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
A.J. v. United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland CEDAW/C/74/D/126/2018 Communication number s : 126/2018 Author: A.J. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 74 Country United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland JUTBCEDAW/C/74/D/126/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2666/en-US
Ahani v. Canada
Ahani v. Canada CCPR/C/80/D/1051/2002 Communication number s : 1051/2002 Author: Mansour Ahani Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 80 Country Canada Submission date 10 Jan 2002 Date of decision 29 Mar 2004 Comment: Three individual opinions JUTBCCPR/C/80/D/1051/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1108/en-US
Alger v. Australia
Alger v. Australia CCPR/C/120/D/2237/2013 Communication number s : 2237/2013 Author: Christopher Alger Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 120 Country Australia Submission date 30 Mar 2012 Date of decision 13 Jul 2017 Comment: Individual JUTBCCPR/C/120/D/2237/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2315/en-US
Angela González Carreño v. Spain
Angela Gonz lez Carre o v. Spain CEDAW/C/58/D/47/2012 Communication number s : 047/2012 Author: Angela Gonz lez Carre o Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 58 Country Spain Submission date 19 Sep 2012 Date of decision 16 Jul 2014 Comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/58/D/47/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1878/en-US
B.Z. et al. v. Albania
B.Z. et al. v. Albania CCPR/C/121/D/2837/2016 Communication number s : 2837/2016 Author: B.Z. et al. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 121 Country Albania Submission date 13 Jan 2016 Date of decision 08 Nov 2017 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/121/D/2837/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2362/en-US
Bronson Blessington and Matthew Elliot v. Australia
Bronson Blessington and Matthew Elliot v. Australia CCPR/C/112/D/1968/2010 Communication number s : 1968/2010 Author: Bronson Blessington and Matthew Elliot represented by Human Rights Law Centre Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 112 Country JUTBCCPR/C/112/D/1968/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1890/en-US
C. v. Australia
C. v. Australia CCPR/C/76/D/900/1999 Communication number s : 900/1999 Author: C. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 76 Country Australia Submission date 23 Nov 1999 Date of decision 28 Oct 2002 Comment: Under rule 85 of the Committee s rules JUTBCCPR/C/76/D/900/1999https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1026/en-US
CASE OF A.A.M. v. SWEDEN
CASE OF A.A.M. v. SWEDEN 68519/10 LINDBERG C. O. SWE 4/3/2014 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Expulsion Conditional Iraq 350 620 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0403JUD006851910 FIFTH SECTION CASE OF A.A.M. v. SWEDEN Application ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0403JUD006851910https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-142085
CASE OF A.A. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF A.A. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 8000/08 THE AIRE CENTRE GBR 9/20/2011 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Violation of Art. 8 in case of expulsion to Nigeria Sections 3 5 a and 5 of the Immigration Act 1971 Sections 82 1 82 2 j and k and 84 of the ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0920JUD000800008https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-106282
CASE OF A AND B v. NORWAY
CASE OF A AND B v. NORWAY 24130/11 29758/11 KJELDAHL R. NOR 11/15/2016 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 Right not to be tried or punished twice general Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 Right not to be tried or punished twice Criminal ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1115JUD002413011https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-168972
CASE OF A, B AND C v. IRELAND
CASE OF A B AND C v. IRELAND 25579/05 KAY J. IRL 12/16/2010 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed non exhaustion of domestic remedies Remainder inadmissible No violation of Art. 8 Violation of Art. 8 Non pecuniary damage award ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1216JUD002557905https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-102332
CASE OF A, B AND C v. LATVIA
CASE OF A B AND C v. LATVIA 30808/11 MOLA I. LVA 3/31/2016 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed Article 34 Victim No violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 Positive obligations Article 8 1 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0331JUD003080811https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-161741
CASE OF A.H. AND J.K. v. CYPRUS
CASE OF A.H. AND J.K. v. CYPRUS 41903/10 41911/10 CHARALAMBIDOU N. CYP 7/21/2015 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 5 Right to liberty and security Article 5 4 Review of lawfulness of detention Violation of Article 5 Right to liberty and security Article 5 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0721JUD004190310https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-156264
CASE OF A.M. AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
CASE OF A.M. AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA 47220/19 GLUSHKOVA T. KHAYMOVICH D. RUS 7/6/2021 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Ratione personae Violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0706JUD004722019https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-210878
CASE OF A.M. v. NORWAY
CASE OF A.M. v. NORWAY 30254/18 ANDRESEN K.S.S. NOR 3/24/2022 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies No violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 1 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0324JUD003025418https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-216348