Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 699
15. Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 15. Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities New York 13 December 2006 Entry into force : 3 May 2008 in accordance with article 45 1 . Registration : 3 May 2008 No. 44910 Status : UNIV-15https://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-15&chapter=4&clang=_en
A.A. v. Denmark
A.A. v. Denmark CAT/C/49/D/412/2010 Communication number s : 412/2010 Author: A.A. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 49 Country Denmark Submission date 30 Sep 2009 Date of decision 13 Nov 2012 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/49/D/412/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/23/en-US
Alger v. Australia
Alger v. Australia CCPR/C/120/D/2237/2013 Communication number s : 2237/2013 Author: Christopher Alger Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 120 Country Australia Submission date 30 Mar 2012 Date of decision 13 Jul 2017 Comment: Individual JUTBCCPR/C/120/D/2237/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2315/en-US
Benhadj v. Algeria
Benhadj v. Algeria CCPR/C/90/D/1173/2003 Communication number s : 1173/2003 Author: Abdelhamid Benhadj Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 90 Country Algeria Submission date 31 Mar 2003 Date of decision 20 Jul 2007 Comment: Two Committee JUTBCCPR/C/90/D/1173/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1363/en-US
Bronson Blessington and Matthew Elliot v. Australia
Bronson Blessington and Matthew Elliot v. Australia CCPR/C/112/D/1968/2010 Communication number s : 1968/2010 Author: Bronson Blessington and Matthew Elliot represented by Human Rights Law Centre Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 112 Country JUTBCCPR/C/112/D/1968/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1890/en-US
C. v. Australia
C. v. Australia CCPR/C/76/D/900/1999 Communication number s : 900/1999 Author: C. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 76 Country Australia Submission date 23 Nov 1999 Date of decision 28 Oct 2002 Comment: Under rule 85 of the Committee s rules JUTBCCPR/C/76/D/900/1999https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1026/en-US
CASE OF A AND B v. NORWAY
CASE OF A AND B v. NORWAY 24130/11 29758/11 KJELDAHL R. NOR 11/15/2016 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 Right not to be tried or punished twice general Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 Right not to be tried or punished twice Criminal ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1115JUD002413011https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-168972
CASE OF A.M. AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
CASE OF A.M. AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA 47220/19 GLUSHKOVA T. KHAYMOVICH D. RUS 7/6/2021 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Ratione personae Violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0706JUD004722019https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-210878
CASE OF A.M. v. NORWAY
CASE OF A.M. v. NORWAY 30254/18 ANDRESEN K.S.S. NOR 3/24/2022 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies No violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 1 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0324JUD003025418https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-216348
CASE OF A.V. v. SLOVENIA
CASE OF A.V. v. SLOVENIA 878/13 Ceferin and Partners Odvetniska druzba Ceferin in partnerji SVN 4/9/2019 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 Positive obligations Article 8 1 Respect for family life 451 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0409JUD000087813https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-192205
CASE OF ABDI IBRAHIM v. NORWAY
CASE OF ABDI IBRAHIM v. NORWAY 15379/16 LUTINA A. NOR 12/10/2021 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 1 Respect for family life read in the light of Article 9 Art. 9 Freedom of thought conscience and ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1210JUD001537916https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-214433
CASE OF ABDULAZIZ, CABALES AND BALKANDALI v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF ABDULAZIZ CABALES AND BALKANDALI v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 9214/80 9473/81 9474/81 N/A GBR 5/28/1985 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 14 8 Violation of Art. 13 Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Costs and expenses award Convention ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1985:0528JUD000921480https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57416
CASE OF ABDULLAHI ELMI AND AWEYS ABUBAKAR v. MALTA
CASE OF ABDULLAHI ELMI AND AWEYS ABUBAKAR v. MALTA 25794/13 28151/13 CAMILLERI M. CAMILLERI K. MLT 11/22/2016 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Degrading treatment Substantive aspect Violation of Article 5 Right to ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1122JUD002579413https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-168780
CASE OF ABU ZUBAYDAH v. LITHUANIA
CASE OF ABU ZUBAYDAH v. LITHUANIA 46454/11 DUFFY H. MICKUM IV G.B. MARGULIES J. LTU 5/31/2018 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 34 Individual applications Art. 34 Victim Preliminary objections joined to merits and dismissed Art. 35 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0531JUD004645411https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-183687
CASE OF ACHOUR v. FRANCE
CASE OF ACHOUR v. FRANCE 67335/01 THOUIN PALAT F. FRA 3/29/2006 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 7 Article 132 9 of the new Criminal Code which came into force on 1 March 1994 288 535 434 491 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0329JUD006733501 GRAND CHAMBER CASE OF ACHOUR ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0329JUD006733501https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-72927
CASE OF ADALI v. TURKEY
CASE OF ADALI v. TURKEY 38187/97 BINDMAN PARTNERS MESSRS TUR 3/31/2005 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Article 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies No violation of Article 2 Right to life Article 2 1 Life Substantive aspect Violation of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0331JUD003818797https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-68670
CASE OF ADAM v. SLOVAKIA
CASE OF ADAM v. SLOVAKIA 68066/12 DURBAKOVA V. SVK 7/26/2016 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed Article 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Remainder inadmissible No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0726JUD006806612https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-165230
CASE OF ADVANCE PHARMA SP. Z O.O v. POLAND
CASE OF ADVANCE PHARMA SP. Z O.O v. POLAND 1469/20 G SIOROWSKA M. METELSKA J. POL 2/3/2022 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Violation of Article 6 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0203JUD000146920https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-215388
CASE OF AGOSI v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF AGOSI v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 9118/80 N/A GBR 10/24/1986 12:00:00 AM No violation of P1 1 Customs and Excise Act 1952 Section 288 369 62 321 168 304 509 445 70 448 339 ECLI:CE:ECHR:1986:1024JUD000911880 COURT CHAMBER CASE OF AGOSI v. THE UNITED ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1986:1024JUD000911880https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57418
CASE OF AIR CANADA v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF AIR CANADA v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 18465/91 N/A GBR 5/5/1995 12:00:00 AM No violation of P1 1 No violation of Art. 6 1 Customs and Excise Management Act 1979 sections 139 1 and 5 141 1 142 152 Schedule 3 paras. 6 7 and 16 1952 Act on customs 1876 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:0505JUD001846591https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57939