Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1341 - 1360 of 1507
G.K. v. Switzerland
G.K. v. Switzerland CAT/C/30/D/219/2002 Communication number s : 219/2002 Author: G.K. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 30 Country Switzerland Submission date 18 Oct 2002 Date of decision 07 May 2003 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/30/D/219/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/165/en-US
G.P. and G.P. v. Canada
G.P. and G.P. v. Canada CCPR/C/132/D/3016/2017 Communication number s : 3016/2017 Author: G.P. and G.P. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 132 Country Canada Submission date 11 Aug 2017 Date of decision 23 Jul 2021 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/132/D/3016/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3177/en-US
GREVIO’s (Baseline) Evaluation Report on legislative and other measures giving effect to the provisions of the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence (Istanbul Convention) NETHERLANDS
GREVIO s Baseline Evaluation Report on legislative and other measures giving effect to the provisions of the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence Istanbul Convention NETHERLANDS NLD a15 a23 GREVIOGREVIO-Inf(2019)19_Netherlands_Baseline_Evaluation_Report_enghttps://hudoc.grevio.coe.int/eng?i=GREVIO-Inf(2019)19_Netherlands_Baseline_Evaluation_Report_eng
Gonzales v. Trinidad and Tobago
Gonzales v. Trinidad and Tobago CCPR/C/65/D/673/1995 Communication number s : 673/1995 Author: Franklyn Gonzales Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 65 Country Trinidad and Tobago Submission date 12 Dec 1994 Date of decision 23 Mar 1999 JUTBCCPR/C/65/D/673/1995https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/767/en-US
Government comments on the third report on Cyprus
Government comments on the third report on Cyprus CYP 2005 12 16 2006 05 16 APPENDIX The following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in Cyprus ECRI wishes to point out that the analysis contained in its ECRICYP-COM-III-2006-017-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=CYP-COM-III-2006-017-ENG
Government comments on the third report on Italy
Government comments on the third report on Italy ITA 2005 12 16 2006 05 16 APPENDIX The following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in Italy ECRI wishes to point out that the analysis contained in its ECRIITA-COM-III-2006-019-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=ITA-COM-III-2006-019-ENG
H.S. v. Australia
H.S. v. Australia CCPR/C/113/D/2015/2010 Communication number s : 2015/2010 Author: H.S. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 113 Country Australia Submission date 19 Feb 2010 Date of decision 30 Mar 2015 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/113/D/2015/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1925/en-US
Horvath v. Australia
Horvath v. Australia CCPR/C/110/D/1885/2009 Communication number s : 1885/2009 Author: Corinna Horvath Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 110 Country Australia Submission date 19 Aug 2008 Date of decision 27 Mar 2014 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/110/D/1885/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1802/en-US
Hoyos y Martínez de Irujo v. Spain
Hoyos y Mart nez de Irujo v. Spain CCPR/C/80/D/1008/2001 Communication number s : 1008/2001 Author: Isabel Hoyos y Mart nez de Irujo Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 80 Country Spain Submission date 04 Sep 2001 Date of decision 30 Mar JUTBCCPR/C/80/D/1008/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1104/en-US
Hudoyberganova v. Uzbekistan
Hudoyberganova v. Uzbekistan CCPR/C/82/D/931/2000 Communication number s : 931/2000 Author: Raihon Hudoyberganova Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 82 Country Uzbekistan Submission date 15 Sep 1999 Date of decision 05 Nov 2004 Comment: The JUTBCCPR/C/82/D/931/2000https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/977/en-US
I.A.F.B. v. Sweden
I.A.F.B. v. Sweden CAT/C/49/D/425/2010 Communication number s : 425/2010 Author: I.A.F.B. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 49 Country Sweden Submission date 22 Jun 2010 Date of decision 13 Nov 2012 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/49/D/425/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/14/en-US
I.D.G. v. Spain
I.D.G. v. Spain E/C.12/55/D/2/2014 Communication number s : 002/2014 Author: I.D.G. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 55 Country Spain Submission date 28 Jan 2014 Date of decision 17 Jun 2015 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBE/C.12/55/D/2/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2010/en-US
INDONESIA: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS COMBINED SIXTH AND SEVENTH PERIODIC REPORT
INDONESIA: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS COMBINED SIXTH AND SEVENTH PERIODIC REPORT CEDAW/C/IDN/CO/6 7 NULL 2012 08 07T00:00:00 CEDAW United Nations CEDAW/C/IDN/CO/6 7 Convention on the Elimination Distr.: General of All Forms of Discrimination 7 August 2012 UHRICEDAW/C/IDN/CO/6-7https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/1758c183-98bf-4a89-b09e-23d4f445d168
Independent Expert on the Right to Development
Report to HRC E/CN.4/2002/WG.18/6/Add.1 2002 31 December 2002 Independent Expert on the Right to Development Sweden E UNITED NATIONS Economic and Social Distr. Council GENERAL E/CN.4/2002/WG.18/6/Add.1 31 December 2002 Original: ENGLISH COMMISSION ON UNSPE/CN.4/2002/WG.18/6/Add.1https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=E%2fCN.4%2f2002%2fWG.18%2f6%2fAdd.1&Lang=en
Independent Expert on the effects of foreign debt and other related international financial obligations of States on the full enjoyment of all human rights, particularly economic, social and cultural rights
Report to HRC A/HRC/20/23/Add.2 from 25 July 2011 to 5 August 2011 11 June 2012 Independent Expert on the effects of foreign debt and other related international financial obligations of States on the full enjoyment of all human rights particularly UNSPA/HRC/20/23/Add.2https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f20%2f23%2fAdd.2&Lang=en
Independent Expert on the situation of human rights in Haiti
Report to HRC E/CN.4/2001/106 from 25 September 2000 to 29 September 2000 30 January 2001 Independent Expert on the situation of human rights in Haiti Haiti E UNITED NATIONS Economic and Social Distr. Council GENERAL E/CN.4/2001/106 30 January 2001 UNSPE/CN.4/2001/106https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=E%2fCN.4%2f2001%2f106&Lang=en
Ioane Teitiota v. New Zealand
Ioane Teitiota v. New Zealand CCPR/C/127/D/2728/2016 Communication number s : 2728/2016 Author: Ioane Teitiota Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 127 Country New Zealand Submission date 15 Sep 2015 Date of decision 24 Oct 2019 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/127/D/2728/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2798/en-US
J.B. v. Canada
J.B. v. Canada CAT/C/57/D/529/2012 Communication number s : 529/2012 Author: J.B. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 57 Country Canada Submission date 16 Nov 2012 Date of decision 06 May 2016 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/57/D/529/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3005/en-US
J.S.H.R. v. Spain
J.S.H.R. v. Spain CRC/C/81/D/13/2017 Communication number s : 013/2017 Author: J.S.H.R. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 81 Country Spain Submission date 20 Sep 2016 Date of decision 15 May 2019 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCRC/C/81/D/13/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2525/en-US
J.S. v. Canada
J.S. v. Canada CAT/C/62/D/695/2015 Communication number s : 695/2015 Author: J.S. represented by counsel Rajwinder S. Bhambi Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 62 Country Canada Submission date 10 Aug 2015 Date of decision 28 Nov 2017 JUTBCAT/C/62/D/695/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2412/en-US