Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1461 - 1480 of 1793
D.V.K. v. Kazakhstan
D.V.K. v. Kazakhstan CCPR/C/132/D/2675/2015 Communication number s : 2675/2015 Author: D.V.K. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 132 Country Kazakhstan Submission date 20 May 2015 Date of decision 23 Jul 2021 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/132/D/2675/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3173/en-US
Decision on admissibility and the merits: European Committee for Home-Based Priority Action for the Child and the Family (EUROCEF) v. France, Complaint No. 82/2012
Decision on admissibility and the merits: European Committee for Home Based Priority Action for the Child and the Family EUROCEF v. France Complaint No. 82/2012 FRA 16 00 000 30 00 163 91 175 163 91 212 163 19/03/2013 15/07/2013 European Committee of ESCcc-82-2012-dadmissandmerits-enhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=cc-82-2012-dadmissandmerits-en
Decision on the merits: International Federation of Human Rights Leagues (FIDH) v. Greece, Collective Complaint No. 72/2011
Decision on the merits: International Federation of Human Rights Leagues FIDH v. Greece Collective Complaint No. 72/2011 GRC 11 01 000 11 02 000 11 03 000 23/01/2013 05/06/2013 European Committee of Social Rights Comit europ en des Droits sociaux DECISION ESCcc-72-2011-dmerits-enhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=cc-72-2011-dmerits-en
Deperraz and Delieutraz v. France
Deperraz and Delieutraz v. France CCPR/C/83/D/1118/2002 Communication number s : 1118/2002 Author: Jean Louis Deperraz and his wife Genevi ve Delieutraz Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 83 Country France Submission date 11 Oct 2000 JUTBCCPR/C/83/D/1118/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1170/en-US
Dissanayake v. Sri Lanka
Dissanayake v. Sri Lanka CCPR/C/93/D/1373/2005 Communication number s : 1373/2005 Author: Dissanayake Mudiyanselage Sumanaweera Banda Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 93 Country Sri Lanka Submission date 03 Mar 2005 Date of decision 22 Jul JUTBCCPR/C/93/D/1373/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1430/en-US
Dixit v. Australia
Dixit v. Australia CCPR/C/77/D/978/2001 Communication number s : 978/2001 Author: Sunil Dixit Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 77 Country Australia Submission date 18 May 1998 Date of decision 28 Mar 2003 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/77/D/978/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1042/en-US
ERMENYI v. Hungary
ERMENYI v. Hungary HUN 22/02/2017 00:00:00 24/03/2017 11:39:16 Case Description: Protection of private life: Unjustified interference due to the premature termination of the applicant s mandate as Vice President of the Supreme Court in parallel with the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46371
Ellis v. Jamaica
Ellis v. Jamaica CCPR/C/45/D/276/1988 Communication number s : 276/1988 Author: Trevor Ellis Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 45 Country Jamaica Submission date 01 Mar 1988 Date of decision 28 Jul 1992 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/45/D/276/1988https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/483/en-US
Engo v. Cameroon
Engo v. Cameroon CCPR/C/96/D/1397/2005 Communication number s : 1397/2005 Author: Pierre D sir Engo Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 96 Country Cameroon Submission date 30 Mar 2005 Date of decision 22 Jul 2009 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/96/D/1397/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1527/en-US
European Convention on Social Security (ETS No. 078)
European Convention on Social Security ETS No. 078 078 Paris 1972 12 14T00:00:00 Treaty open for signature by the member States and for accession by non member States Paris 1977 03 01T00:00:00 3 Ratifications. The basis of the European Convention on COEETS No. 078https://rm.coe.int/1680074611
F.B. et al. v. France
F.B. et al. v. France CRC/C/86/D/R.77/2019 Communication number s : 77/2019 Author: F.B. et al. Type of decision: Admissibility decision Session No 86 Country France Submission date 01 Mar 2019 Date of decision 04 Feb 2021 Comment: This document has no JUTBCRC/C/86/D/R.77/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3575/en-US
F.K.A. v. Canada
F.K.A. v. Canada CAT/C/65/D/784/2016 Communication number s : 784/2016 Author: F.K.A. represented by counsel Mr. Zoheir Snasni Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 65 Country Canada Submission date 07 Nov 2016 Date of decision 15 Nov 2018 JUTBCAT/C/65/D/784/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2473/en-US
F.M. v. Canada
F.M. v. Canada CCPR/C/115/D/2284/2013 Communication number s : 2284/2013 Author: F.M. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 115 Country Canada Submission date 16 Aug 2013 Date of decision 05 Nov 2015 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/115/D/2284/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2025/en-US
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament, judges and prosecutors EVALUATION REPORT CROATIA
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament judges and prosecutors EVALUATION REPORT CROATIA HRV 2014 06 20 2014 06 25 / TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I. INTRODUCTION AND METHODOLOGY II. CONTEXT III. CORRUPTION GRECOGreco-Eval-IV-Rep-2013-7E-Final-Croatia-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=Greco-Eval-IV-Rep-2013-7E-Final-Croatia-PUBLIC
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament, judges and prosecutors EVALUATION REPORT FINLAND
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament judges and prosecutors EVALUATION REPORT FINLAND FIN 2013 03 22 2013 03 27 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION AND METHODOLOGY II. CONTEXT III. CORRUPTION PREVENTION IN GRECOGreco-Eval-IV-Rep-2012-6E-Final-Finland-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=Greco-Eval-IV-Rep-2012-6E-Final-Finland-PUBLIC
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament, judges and prosecutors EVALUATION REPORT LATVIA
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament judges and prosecutors EVALUATION REPORT LATVIA LVA 2012 12 07 2012 12 17 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I. INTRODUCTION AND METHODOLOGY II. CONTEXT III. CORRUPTION GRECOGreco-Eval-IV-Rep-2012-3E-Final-Latvia-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=Greco-Eval-IV-Rep-2012-3E-Final-Latvia-PUBLIC
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament, judges and prosecutors EVALUATION REPORT PORTUGAL
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament judges and prosecutors EVALUATION REPORT PORTUGAL PRT 2015 12 04 2016 02 10 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I. INTRODUCTION AND METHODOLOGY II. CONTEXT III. CORRUPTION GRECOGreco-Eval-IV-Rep-2015-5E-Final-Portugal-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=Greco-Eval-IV-Rep-2015-5E-Final-Portugal-PUBLIC
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament, judges and prosecutors EVALUATION REPORT SERBIA
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament judges and prosecutors EVALUATION REPORT SERBIA SRB 2015 06 19 2015 07 02 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I. INTRODUCTION AND METHODOLOGY II. CONTEXT III. CORRUPTION GRECOGreco-Eval-IV-Rep-2014-8E-Final-Serbia-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=Greco-Eval-IV-Rep-2014-8E-Final-Serbia-PUBLIC
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament, judges and prosecutors EVALUATION REPORT “THE FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA”
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament judges and prosecutors EVALUATION REPORT THE FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA MKD 2013 12 06 2014 03 17 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I. INTRODUCTION AND GRECOGreco-Eval-IV-Rep-2013-4E-Final-FYROM-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=Greco-Eval-IV-Rep-2013-4E-Final-FYROM-PUBLIC
Faure v. Australia
Faure v. Australia CCPR/C/85/D/1036/2001 Communication number s : 1036/2001 Author: Bernadette Faure Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 85 Country Australia Submission date 19 Jun 2001 Date of decision 31 Oct 2005 Comment: Pursuant to rule 90 JUTBCCPR/C/85/D/1036/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1218/en-US