Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 39
A.A.M. v. Sweden
A.A.M. v. Sweden CAT/C/48/D/413/2010 Communication number s : 413/2010 Author: A.A.M. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 48 Country Sweden Submission date 19 Feb 2010 Date of decision 23 May 2012 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/48/D/413/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/49/en-US
CASE OF ABDULLAHI ELMI AND AWEYS ABUBAKAR v. MALTA
CASE OF ABDULLAHI ELMI AND AWEYS ABUBAKAR v. MALTA 25794/13 28151/13 CAMILLERI M. CAMILLERI K. MLT 11/22/2016 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Degrading treatment Substantive aspect Violation of Article 5 Right to ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1122JUD002579413https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-168780
CASE OF AL-SKEINI AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF AL SKEINI AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 55721/07 PUBLIC INTEREST LAWYERS GBR 7/7/2011 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objections dismissed estoppel non exhaustion of domestic remedies Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed lack of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0707JUD005572107https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-105606
CASE OF BABAR AHMAD AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF BABAR AHMAD AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 24027/07 11949/08 36742/08 66911/09 67354/09 PEIRCE G. COOPER B. ARANI M. JONES A. BRANDON B. RAJA A. JONES J. GBR 4/10/2012 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0410JUD002402707https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-110267
CASE OF DRĖLINGAS v. LITHUANIA
CASE OF DR LINGAS v. LITHUANIA 28859/16 N/A LTU 3/12/2019 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 7 No punishment without law Article 7 1 Nullum crimen sine lege Retroactivity Criminal offence Article 99 of the Lithuanian Criminal Code 288 536 291 434 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0312JUD002885916https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-191702
CASE OF GEORGIA v. RUSSIA (II)
CASE OF GEORGIA v. RUSSIA II 38263/08 RUS 1/21/2021 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objections dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Ratione loci ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0121JUD003826308https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-207757
CASE OF H.F. AND OTHERS v. FRANCE
CASE OF H.F. AND OTHERS v. FRANCE 24384/19 44234/20 DOS M. FRA 9/14/2022 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 34 Individual applications Art. 34 Locus standi Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Ratione loci Art. ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0914JUD002438419https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-219333
CASE OF HANDYSIDE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF HANDYSIDE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 5493/72 N/A GBR 12/7/1976 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 10 No violation of P1 1 No violation of Art. 14 No violation of Art. 18 149 148 201 105 265 356 362 316 343 100 369 232 ECLI:CE:ECHR:1976:1207JUD000549372 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1976:1207JUD000549372https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57499
CASE OF MAWAKA v. THE NETHERLANDS
CASE OF MAWAKA v. THE NETHERLANDS 29031/04 VAN DER WAL H. NLD 6/1/2010 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 3 in case of expulsion to the Democratic Republic of the Congo No violation of Art. 8 in case of expulsion to the Democratic Republic of the Congo ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0601JUD002903104https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-98815
CASE OF MUBILANZILA MAYEKA AND KANIKI MITUNGA v. BELGIUM
CASE OF MUBILANZILA MAYEKA AND KANIKI MITUNGA v. BELGIUM 13178/03 VANHEULE D. BEL 10/12/2006 12:00:00 AM Violations of Art. 3 Violations of Art. 8 Violation of Art. 5 1 No violation of Art. 5 1 first applicant Violation of Art. 5 4 No violation of Art. 5 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1012JUD001317803https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-77447
CASE OF N. v. FINLAND
CASE OF N. v. FINLAND 38885/02 BERGMAN THOMAS FIN 7/26/2005 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 3 if expelled No separate issue under Art. 8 Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Aliens Act 1991 Aliens Act 2004 350 90 193 492 451 425 429 216 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0726JUD003888502https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-69908
CASE OF NSONA v. THE NETHERLANDS
CASE OF NSONA v. THE NETHERLANDS 23366/94 N/A NLD 11/28/1996 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection rejected victim No violation of Art. 3 No violation of Art. 8 Not necessary to examine Art. 13 1984 Border Guarding Circular Chapter A6 Civil Code Articles 1233 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:1128JUD002336694https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58008
CASE OF XENOFONTOS AND OTHERS v. CYPRUS
CASE OF XENOFONTOS AND OTHERS v. CYPRUS 68725/16 74339/16 74359/16 VRAHIMIS R. PARASKEVA C. CYP 10/25/2022 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 6 Right to a fair trial Article 6 Criminal proceedings Article 6 1 Fair hearing No violation of Article 6 Right ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1025JUD006872516https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-220184
E.K.W. v. Democratic Republic of the Congo,Finland
E.K.W. v. Democratic Republic of the Congo Finland CAT/C/54/D/490/2012 Communication number s : 490/2012 Author: E.K.W. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 56 Country Democratic Republic of the Congo Finland Submission date 02 Feb 2012 Date of JUTBCAT/C/54/D/490/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1947/en-US
Fourth Opinion on Romania
Fourth Opinion on Romania ROU ACFC/OP/IV 2017 005 2017 06 22 ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES ACFC/OP/IV 2017 005 Fourth Opinion on Romania adopted on 22 June 2017 Published on 16 February 2018 FCNMACFC/OP/IV(2017)005https://hudoc.fcnm.coe.int/eng?i=4_OP_Romania_rev_en
Human Rights Council adopts outcomes of Universal Periodic Review on Ireland, Togo and Syria
Human Rights Council MIDDAY 15 March 2012 The Human Rights Council at its midday meeting today adopted the outcomes of the Universal Periodic Review on Ireland Togo and Syria.Gerard Corr Permanent Representative of Ireland to the United Nations Office at UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2012/03/human-rights-council-adopts-outcomes-universal-periodic-review-ireland-togo
Independent Expert on the question of human rights and extreme poverty
Report to HRC E/CN.4/2004/43 from 18 November 2003 to 20 November 2003 29 February 2004 Independent Expert on the question of human rights and extreme poverty Sudan UNITED NATIONS E Economic and Social Distr. GENERAL Council E/CN.4/2004/43 29 February UNSPE/CN.4/2004/43https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=E%2fCN.4%2f2004%2f43&Lang=en
J.B.N.K. v. Sweden
J.B.N.K. v. Sweden CCPR/C/128/D/2984/2017 Communication number s : 2984/2017 Author: J.B.N.K. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 128 Country Sweden Submission date 22 May 2017 Date of decision 13 Mar 2020 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/128/D/2984/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2833/en-US
K.N. v. France
K.N. v. France CAT/C/23/D/93/1997 Communication number s : 093/1997 Author: K.N. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 23 Country France Submission date 15 Aug 1997 Date of decision 18 Nov 1999 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/23/D/93/1997https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/222/en-US
M. G. v. Germany
M. G. v. Germany CCPR/C/93/D/1482/2006 Communication number s : 1482/2006 Author: M. G. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 93 Country Germany Submission date 26 May 2006 Date of decision 23 Jul 2008 Comment: A request for interim measures was JUTBCCPR/C/93/D/1482/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1435/en-US