Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 6061 - 6080 of 6983
S.S. v. Australia
S.S. v. Australia CAT/C/74/D/935/2019 Communication number s : 935/2019 Author: S.S. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 74 Country Australia Submission date 17 Jun 2019 Date of decision 23 Jul 2022 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/74/D/935/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3612/en-US
S.S. v. Australia
S.S. v. Australia CAT/C/60/D/648/2015 Communication number s : 648/2015 Author: S.S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 60 Country Australia Submission date 14 Oct 2014 Date of decision 10 May 2017 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/60/D/648/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3430/en-US
S.S. v. Canada
S.S. v. Canada CAT/C/62/D/715/2015 Communication number s : 715/2015 Author: S.S. represented by counsel Raj S. Bhambi Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 62 Country Canada Submission date 20 Nov 2015 Date of decision 28 Nov 2017 JUTBCAT/C/62/D/715/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2411/en-US
S.S. v. Canada
S.S. v. Canada CAT/C/59/D/581/2014 Communication number s : 581/2014 Author: S.S. represented by counsel Rajwinder Bhambi Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 59 Country Canada Submission date 02 Jan 2014 Date of decision 30 Nov 2016 Comment: JUTBCAT/C/59/D/581/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2202/en-US
S.S. v. Netherlands
S.S. v. Netherlands CAT/C/30/D/191/2001 Communication number s : 191/2001 Author: S.S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 30 Country Netherlands Submission date 20 Sep 2001 Date of decision 05 May 2003 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/30/D/191/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/172/en-US
S.T. v. Australia
S.T. v. Australia CAT/C/60/D/716/2015 Communication number s : 716/2015 Author: S.T. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 60 Country Australia Submission date 23 Oct 2015 Date of decision 11 May 2017 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/60/D/716/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3463/en-US
S.T. v. Netherlands
S.T. v. Netherlands CAT/C/27/D/175/2000 Communication number s : 175/2000 Author: S.T. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 27 Country Netherlands Submission date 27 Nov 2000 Date of decision 23 Nov 2001 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/27/D/175/2000https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/188/en-US
S.T. v. Russian Federation
S.T. v. Russian Federation CEDAW/C/72/D/65/2014 Communication number s : 065/2014 Author: S.T. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 72 Country Russian Federation Submission date 08 Nov 2013 Date of decision 25 Jan 2019 Comment: This document JUTBCEDAW/C/72/D/65/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2651/en-US
S.U.A. v. Sweden
S.U.A. v. Sweden CAT/C/33/D/223/2002 Communication number s : 223/2002 Author: S.U.A. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 33 Country Sweden Submission date 12 Dec 2002 Date of decision 22 Nov 2004 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/33/D/223/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/139/en-US
S.V. et al. v. Canada
S.V. et al. v. Canada CAT/C/26/D/49/1996 Communication number s : 049/1996 Author: S.V. et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 26 Country Canada Submission date 15 May 1996 Date of decision 15 May 2001 Comment: exact date of admissibility JUTBCAT/C/26/D/49/1996https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/200/en-US
S. V. v. Canada
S. V. v. Canada CCPR/C/105/D/1827/2008 Communication number s : 1827/2008 Author: S. V. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 105 Country Canada Submission date 26 Sep 2008 Date of decision 23 Jul 2012 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/105/D/1827/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1536/en-US
S.Z. v. Denmark
S.Z. v. Denmark CCPR/C/120/D/2625/2015 Communication number s : 2625/2015 Author: S.Z. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 120 Country Denmark Submission date 25 Jun 2015 Date of decision 28 Jul 2017 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/120/D/2625/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2325/en-US
S.Z. v. Denmark
S.Z. v. Denmark CCPR/C/117/D/2443/2014 Communication number s : 2443/2014 Author: S.Z. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 117 Country Denmark Submission date 07 Jul 2014 Date of decision 13 Jul 2016 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/117/D/2443/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2164/en-US
S. v. Denmark
S. v. Denmark CCPR/C/122/D/2642/2015 Communication number s : 2642/2015 Author: S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 122 Country Denmark Submission date 19 Jun 2014 Date of decision 26 Mar 2018 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/122/D/2642/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2443/en-US
S v. Sweden
S v. Sweden CAT/C/59/D/691/2015 Communication number s : 691/2015 Author: S Type of decision: Admissibility decision Session No 59 Country Sweden Submission date 01 Jun 2015 Date of decision 25 Nov 2016 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCAT/C/59/D/691/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2184/en-US
S. v. Sweden
S. v. Sweden CAT/C/65/D/691/2015 Communication number s : 691/2015 Author: S. represented by counsel Viktoria Nystrom Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 65 Country Sweden Submission date 01 Jun 2015 Date of decision 16 Nov 2018 Comment: JUTBCAT/C/65/D/691/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2467/en-US
SAINT VINCENT AND THE GRENADINES : CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
SAINT VINCENT AND THE GRENADINES : CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CCPR/C/VCT/CO/2/ADD.1 NULL 2019 05 09T00:00:00 CCPR United Nations CCPR/C/VCT/CO/2/Add.1 International Covenant on Distr.: General 9 May 2019 Civil and Political Rights Original: English Human UHRICCPR/C/VCT/CO/2/ADD.1https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/eea9b47b-fdc3-4120-95ce-1ddbf600df74
SALAKHOV AND ISLYAMOVA v. Ukraine
SALAKHOV AND ISLYAMOVA v. Ukraine UKR 14/06/2013 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: This case concerns the lack of adequate medical assistance to the first applicant in pre trial detention found primarily due to the Government s failure to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-32272
SAMOILA AND CIONCA v. Romania
SAMOILA AND CIONCA v. Romania ROU 04/06/2008 00:00:00 06/11/2016 15:17:22 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Failure to bring arrested applicants promptly before the judge refusal of competent court to review the lawfulness of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-16653
SARA v. the Republic of Moldova
SARA v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 20/01/2016 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:38:31 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Arbitrary arrest and detention of the applicant in criminal proceedings without him having a formal procedural status of a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7138