Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 55
13. International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of their Families
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 13. International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of their Families New York 18 December 1990 Entry into force : 1 July 2003 in accordance with UNIV-13https://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-13&chapter=4&clang=_en
4. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 4. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights New York 16 December 1966 Entry into force : 23 March 1976 in accordance with article 49 for all provisions except those of article 41 UNIV-4https://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-4&chapter=4&clang=_en
Ali Djahangir oglu Quliyev v. Azerbaijan
Ali Djahangir oglu Quliyev v. Azerbaijan CCPR/C/112/D/1972/2010 Communication number s : 1972/2010 Author: Ali Djahangir oglu Quliyev represented by counsel Eldar Zeynalov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 112 Country Azerbaijan Submission JUTBCCPR/C/112/D/1972/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1892/en-US
CASE OF ABU ZUBAYDAH v. LITHUANIA
CASE OF ABU ZUBAYDAH v. LITHUANIA 46454/11 DUFFY H. MICKUM IV G.B. MARGULIES J. LTU 5/31/2018 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 34 Individual applications Art. 34 Victim Preliminary objections joined to merits and dismissed Art. 35 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0531JUD004645411https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-183687
CASE OF DIKME v. TURKEY
CASE OF DIKME v. TURKEY 20869/92 N/A TUR 7/11/2000 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objections rejected non exhaustion of domestic remedies six month period No violation of Art. 5 2 Violation of Art. 5 3 Violation of Art. 3 in respect of ill treatment Violation of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0711JUD002086992https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58751
CASE OF ERDAGÖZ v. TURKEY
CASE OF ERDAG Z v. TURKEY 21890/93 N/A TUR 10/22/1997 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 3 Preliminary objection rejected non exhaustion No violation of Art. 5 Criminal Code Articles 266 283 and 285 Law no. 466 of 7 May 1964 sections 1 and 2 1 350 193 192 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:1022JUD002189093https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58108
CASE OF FOX, CAMPBELL AND HARTLEY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF FOX CAMPBELL AND HARTLEY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 12244/86 12245/86 12383/86 N/A GBR 8/30/1990 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 5 1 No violation of Art. 5 2 Violation of Art. 5 5 Not necessary to examine Art. 5 4 and 13 Just satisfaction reserved 1978 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1990:0830JUD001224486https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57721
CASE OF LAWLESS v. IRELAND (No. 3)
CASE OF LAWLESS v. IRELAND No. 3 332/57 N/A IRL 7/1/1961 12:00:00 AM Questions of procedure rejected No violation of Art. 7 Offences against the State Amendment Act 1940 Section 4 340 448 445 288 96 ECLI:CE:ECHR:1961:0701JUD000033257 COURT CHAMBER CASE OF ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1961:0701JUD000033257https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57518
CASE OF MAMATKULOV AND ABDURASULOVIC v. TURKEY
CASE OF MAMATKULOV AND ABDURASULOVIC v. TURKEY 46827/99 46951/99 N/A TUR 2/6/2003 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 3 No violation of Art. 6 as regard the extradition proceedings No separate issue under Art. 6 as regard the other complaints Violation of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0206JUD004682799https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-60924
CASE OF MAMATKULOV AND ASKAROV v. TURKEY
CASE OF MAMATKULOV AND ASKAROV v. TURKEY 46827/99 46951/99 CARSANCAKLI I.S. TUR 2/4/2005 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 3 Not necessary to examine Art. 2 Inadmissible under Art. 6 concerning the exradition proceedings No violation of Art. 6 1 Failure to ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0204JUD004682799https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-68183
CASE OF MEDVEDYEV AND OTHERS v. FRANCE
CASE OF MEDVEDYEV AND OTHERS v. FRANCE 3394/03 SPINOSI P. FRA 7/10/2008 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 5 1 No violation of Art. 5 3 Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient 448 29 30 93 209 339 216 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0710JUD000339403 FIFTH ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0710JUD000339403https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-87369
CASE OF MERABISHVILI v. GEORGIA
CASE OF MERABISHVILI v. GEORGIA 72508/13 LEACH P. SAWYER J. GEO 11/28/2017 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Art. 35 4 Rejection of application at any stage of the ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1128JUD007250813https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-178753
CASE OF ČONKA v. BELGIUM
CASE OF ONKA v. BELGIUM 51564/99 N/A BEL 2/5/2002 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies No violation of Article 5 Right to liberty and security Article 5 1 Lawful arrest or ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0205JUD005156499https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-60026
CASE OF SAADI v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF SAADI v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 13229/03 WILSON Co. GBR 1/29/2008 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 5 1 Violation of Art. 5 2 Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Schedules 2 paragraph 2 8 9 10 16 1 and 21 1 and section 11 of the ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0129JUD001322903https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-84709
CASE OF SUSO MUSA v. MALTA
CASE OF SUSO MUSA v. MALTA 42337/12 FALZON N. MLT 7/23/2013 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 5 Right to liberty and security Article 5 4 Review of lawfulness of detention Speediness of review Violation of Article 5 Right to liberty ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0723JUD004233712https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-122893
CASE OF VALIULIENĖ v. LITHUANIA
CASE OF VALIULIEN v. LITHUANIA 33234/07 MICKEVICIUS H. LTU 3/26/2013 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Positive obligations Substantive aspect Non pecuniary damage award Article 116 of the old Criminal Code Article 140 1 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0326JUD003323407https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-117636
Decision on the merits: Médecins du Monde - International v. France, Collective Complaint No. 67/2011
Decision on the merits: M decins du Monde International v. France Collective Complaint No. 67/2011 FRA 11 01 000 11 02 000 11 03 000 13 01 000 13 04 000 16 00 000 17 02 163 30 00 163 31 01 163 31 02 163 19 08 000 16 00 000 91 00 163 11/09/2012 21/01/2013 ESCcc-67-2011-dmerits-enhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=cc-67-2011-dmerits-en
Eleventh Activity Report (2016-2018)
Eleventh Activity Report 2016 2018 ACFC/INF 2018 001 2018 05 31 2018 10 01 Strasbourg 31 May 2018 Restricted ACFC/INF 2018 001 Eleventh activity report covering the period 1 June 2016 31 May 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE ADVISORY FCNMACFC/INF (2018)001https://hudoc.fcnm.coe.int/eng?i=11th_Activity_Report_2016_2018
Faragollah et al. v. Switzerland
Faragollah et al. v. Switzerland CAT/C/47/D/381/2009 Communication number s : 381/2009 Author: Abolghasem Faragollah et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 47 Country Switzerland Submission date 17 Apr 2009 Date of decision 21 Nov 2011 JUTBCAT/C/47/D/381/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/46/en-US
Fourth report on Monaco
Fourth report on Monaco MCO 2022 03 29 2022 06 09 CRI 2022 18 Fourth report on Monaco Sixth monitoring cycle Adopted on 29 March 2022 Published on 9 June 2022 ECRI Secretariat Directorate General II Democracy Council of Europe F 67075 STRASBOURG Cedex ECRIMCO-CbC-VI-2022-018-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=MCO-CbC-VI-2022-018-ENG