Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 155
4. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 4. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights New York 16 December 1966 Entry into force : 23 March 1976 in accordance with article 49 for all provisions except those of article 41 UNIV-4https://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-4&chapter=4&clang=_en
A/HRC/47/8: Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review - Australia
United Nations A/HRC/47/8 General Assembly Distr.: General 24 March 2021 Original: English Human Rights Council Forty seventh session 21 June 9 July 2021 Agenda item 6 Universal periodic review Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review UPRA/HRC/47/8https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/country-reports/ahrc478-report-working-group-universal-periodic-review-australia
A. v. Canada
A. v. Canada CAT/C/57/D/583/2014 Communication number s : 583/2014 Author: A. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 57 Country Canada Submission date 16 Dec 2014 Date of decision 09 May 2016 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCAT/C/57/D/583/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2115/en-US
A. v. Denmark
A. v. Denmark CEDAW/C/62/D/53/2013 Communication number s : 53/2013 Author: A. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 62 Country Denmark Submission date 11 Apr 2013 Date of decision 19 Nov 2015 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCEDAW/C/62/D/53/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3027/en-US
Agiza v. Sweden
Agiza v. Sweden CAT/C/34/D/233/2003 Communication number s : 233/2003 Author: Ahmed Hussein Mustafa Kamil Agiza Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 34 Country Sweden Submission date 25 Jun 2003 Date of decision 20 May 2005 Comment: Decision on JUTBCAT/C/34/D/233/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/140/en-US
CASE OF A. AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF A. AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 3455/05 BIRNBERG PIERCE AND PARTNERS GBR 2/19/2009 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 3 No violation of Art. 13 3 Preliminary objection rejected Government not precluded from raising defence under Art. 5 1 f or ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0219JUD000345505https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-91403
CASE OF ABDULAZIZ, CABALES AND BALKANDALI v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF ABDULAZIZ CABALES AND BALKANDALI v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 9214/80 9473/81 9474/81 N/A GBR 5/28/1985 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 14 8 Violation of Art. 13 Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Costs and expenses award Convention ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1985:0528JUD000921480https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57416
CASE OF CHAHAL v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF CHAHAL v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 22414/93 N/A GBR 11/15/1996 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 3 Violation of Art. 5 4 Violation of Art. 13 No violation of Art. 5 1 Not necessary to examine Art. 8 Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Costs ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:1115JUD002241493https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58004
CASE OF D.H. AND OTHERS v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC
CASE OF D.H. AND OTHERS v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC 57325/00 LORD LESTER OF HERNE HILL QC GOLDSTON J. STRUPEK D. CZE 11/13/2007 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed non exhaustion of domestic remedies Violation of Art. 14 P1 2 General measures refused ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1113JUD005732500https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-83256
CASE OF GEORGIA v. RUSSIA (II)
CASE OF GEORGIA v. RUSSIA II 38263/08 RUS 1/21/2021 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objections dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Ratione loci ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0121JUD003826308https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-207757
CASE OF H.F. AND OTHERS v. FRANCE
CASE OF H.F. AND OTHERS v. FRANCE 24384/19 44234/20 DOS M. FRA 9/14/2022 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 34 Individual applications Art. 34 Locus standi Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Ratione loci Art. ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0914JUD002438419https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-219333
CASE OF HASSAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF HASSAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 29750/09 SHINER P. OTTY T. HICKMAN T. GBR 9/16/2014 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible No violation of Article 5 Right to liberty and security Article 5 1 Deprivation of liberty Lawful arrest or detention No violation ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0916JUD002975009https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-146501
CASE OF ILIAS AND AHMED v. HUNGARY
CASE OF ILIAS AND AHMED v. HUNGARY 47287/15 POH RNOK B. HUN 11/21/2019 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection allowed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Six month period Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Ratione materiae ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1121JUD004728715https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-198760
CASE OF KRUPKO AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
CASE OF KRUPKO AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA 26587/07 CHIMIROV A. DANIEL R. RUS 6/26/2014 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 5 Right to liberty and security Article 5 1 Deprivation of liberty Lawful arrest or detention Violation of Article 9 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0626JUD002658707https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-145013
CASE OF MAGYAR JETI ZRT v. HUNGARY
CASE OF MAGYAR JETI ZRT v. HUNGARY 11257/16 VERMEER V. HUN 12/4/2018 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 10 Freedom of expression general Article 10 1 Freedom of expression Pecuniary damage award Article 41 Pecuniary damage Just satisfaction 451 429 149 148 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1204JUD001125716https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-187930
CASE OF MAMATKULOV AND ABDURASULOVIC v. TURKEY
CASE OF MAMATKULOV AND ABDURASULOVIC v. TURKEY 46827/99 46951/99 N/A TUR 2/6/2003 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 3 No violation of Art. 6 as regard the extradition proceedings No separate issue under Art. 6 as regard the other complaints Violation of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0206JUD004682799https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-60924
CASE OF MAMATKULOV AND ASKAROV v. TURKEY
CASE OF MAMATKULOV AND ASKAROV v. TURKEY 46827/99 46951/99 CARSANCAKLI I.S. TUR 2/4/2005 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 3 Not necessary to examine Art. 2 Inadmissible under Art. 6 concerning the exradition proceedings No violation of Art. 6 1 Failure to ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0204JUD004682799https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-68183
CASE OF MOCANU AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA
CASE OF MOCANU AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA 10865/09 45886/07 32431/08 POPESCU A. SFIRAIALA I. MATEI I. NACEA D. HARTNEANU D.O. ROU 9/17/2014 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objections dismissed Article 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Six month period Article 35 3 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0917JUD001086509https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-146540
CASE OF N.S. v. DENMARK
CASE OF N.S. v. DENMARK 58359/08 BOSERUP H. DNK 1/20/2011 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible No violation of Art. 3 in case of expulsion to Sri Lanka 350 620 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0120JUD005835908 FIFTH SECTION CASE OF N.S. v. DENMARK Application no. 58359/08 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0120JUD005835908https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-102957
CASE OF NA. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF NA. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 25904/07 MOLE N. GBR 7/17/2008 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 3 350 193 492 449 216 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0717JUD002590407 FOURTH SECTION CASE OF NA. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM Application no. 25904/07 JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 17 July ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0717JUD002590407https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-87458