Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 21 - 40 of 900
Ambaryan v. Kyrgyzstan
Ambaryan v. Kyrgyzstan CCPR/C/120/D/2162/2012 Communication number s : 2162/2012 Author: Arsen Ambaryan Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 120 Country Kyrgyzstan Submission date 20 Apr 2012 Date of decision 28 Jul 2017 Comment: Annex: JUTBCCPR/C/120/D/2162/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2307/en-US
Ashim Rakishev and Dmitry Rakishev v. Kazakhstan
Ashim Rakishev and Dmitry Rakishev v. Kazakhstan CAT/C/61/D/661/2015 Communication number s : 661/2015 Author: Ashim Rakishev father and Dmitry Rakishev son represented by counsel Anara Ibraeva Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 61 Country JUTBCAT/C/61/D/661/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2276/en-US
Askarov v. Kyrgyzstan
Askarov v. Kyrgyzstan CCPR/C/116/D/2231/2012 Communication number s : 2231/2012 Author: Azimjan Askarov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 116 Country Kyrgyzstan Submission date 12 Nov 2012 Date of decision 31 Mar 2016 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/116/D/2231/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2112/en-US
Aung v. Canada
Aung v. Canada CAT/C/36/D/273/2005 Communication number s : 273/2005 Author: Thu Aung Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 36 Country Canada Submission date 13 Jul 2005 Date of decision 15 May 2006 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/36/D/273/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/117/en-US
B.M.I. and N.A.K. v. Denmark
B.M.I. and N.A.K. v. Denmark CCPR/C/118/D/2569/2015 Communication number s : 2569/2015 Author: B.M.I. and N.A.K. represented by counsel Hannah Krog Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 118 Country Denmark Submission date 06 Feb 2015 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/118/D/2569/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2229/en-US
B.M.S. v. Sweden
B.M.S. v. Sweden CAT/C/56/D/594/2014 Communication number s : 594/2014 Author: B.M.S. not represented by counsel Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 56 Country Sweden Submission date 09 Feb 2014 Date of decision 25 Nov 2015 Comment: Non JUTBCAT/C/56/D/594/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2079/en-US
B.Z. et al. v. Albania
B.Z. et al. v. Albania CCPR/C/121/D/2837/2016 Communication number s : 2837/2016 Author: B.Z. et al. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 121 Country Albania Submission date 13 Jan 2016 Date of decision 08 Nov 2017 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/121/D/2837/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2362/en-US
Bacher v. Austria
Bacher v. Austria CRPD/C/19/D/26/2014 Communication number s : 026/2014 Author: Viktoria Bacher Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 20 Country Austria Submission date 08 Feb 2014 Date of decision 16 Feb 2018 Comment: This document has no JUTBCRPD/C/19/D/26/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2394/en-US
Bakar Japalali and Carmen Baloyo-Japalali v. Philippines
Bakar Japalali and Carmen Baloyo Japalali v. Philippines CCPR/C/125/D/2536/2015 Communication number s : 2536/2015 Author: Hadji Hamid Japalali Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 125 Country Philippines Submission date 01 Sep 2014 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/125/D/2536/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2569/en-US
Bakhtiyari v. Australia
Bakhtiyari v. Australia CCPR/C/79/D/1069/2002 Communication number s : 1069/2002 Author: Ali Aqsar Bakhtiyari and Roqaiha Bakhtiyari Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 79 Country Australia Submission date 25 Mar 2002 Date of decision 29 Oct JUTBCCPR/C/79/D/1069/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1092/en-US
Barrero Lozano v. Sweden
Barrero Lozano v. Sweden CCPR/C/67/D/748/1997 Communication number s : 748/1997 Author: Luis Fabio Barrero Lozano Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 67 Country Sweden Submission date 04 Jun 1996 Date of decision 18 Oct 1999 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/67/D/748/1997https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/864/en-US
Bator v. Poland
Bator v. Poland CCPR/C/84/D/1037/2001 Communication number s : 1037/2001 Author: Zdzislaw Bator Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 84 Country Poland Submission date 03 Oct 2001 Date of decision 22 Jul 2005 Comment: Pursuant to rule 90 JUTBCCPR/C/84/D/1037/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1161/en-US
Bayush Alemseged Araya v. Denmark
Bayush Alemseged Araya v. Denmark CCPR/C/123/D/2575/2015 Communication number s : 2575/2015 Author: Bayush Alemseged Araya Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 123 Country Denmark Submission date 24 Feb 2015 Date of decision 13 Jul 2018 JUTBCCPR/C/123/D/2575/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2544/en-US
Ben Said v. Norway
Ben Said v. Norway CCPR/C/68/D/767/1997 Communication number s : 767/1997 Author: Zouhair Ben Said Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 68 Country Norway Submission date 28 Oct 1996 Date of decision 29 Mar 2000 Comment: An individual opinion JUTBCCPR/C/68/D/767/1997https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/898/en-US
CASE OF A.A. AND OTHERS v. NORTH MACEDONIA
CASE OF A.A. AND OTHERS v. NORTH MACEDONIA 55798/16 55808/16 55817/16 55820/16 55823/16 GERICKE C. MKD 4/5/2022 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 34 Individual applications Art. 34 Victim Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 35 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0405JUD005579816https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-216861
CASE OF A.A. AND OTHERS v. SWEDEN
CASE OF A.A. AND OTHERS v. SWEDEN 14499/09 RIMSTEN E. SWE 6/28/2012 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 2 Right to life Article 2 Extradition Conditional Yemen No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Extradition Conditional Yemen 449 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0628JUD001449909https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-111553
CASE OF A. AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF A. AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 3455/05 BIRNBERG PIERCE AND PARTNERS GBR 2/19/2009 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 3 No violation of Art. 13 3 Preliminary objection rejected Government not precluded from raising defence under Art. 5 1 f or ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0219JUD000345505https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-91403
CASE OF A, B AND C v. IRELAND
CASE OF A B AND C v. IRELAND 25579/05 KAY J. IRL 12/16/2010 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed non exhaustion of domestic remedies Remainder inadmissible No violation of Art. 8 Violation of Art. 8 Non pecuniary damage award ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1216JUD002557905https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-102332
CASE OF A.M. v. NORWAY
CASE OF A.M. v. NORWAY 30254/18 ANDRESEN K.S.S. NOR 3/24/2022 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies No violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 1 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0324JUD003025418https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-216348
CASE OF A.M. v. THE NETHERLANDS
CASE OF A.M. v. THE NETHERLANDS 29094/09 TER MEULEN MOUWEN E. NLD 7/5/2016 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed Article 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Remainder inadmissible No violation of Article 13 3 Right to an ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0705JUD002909409https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-164460