Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 2281 - 2300 of 2424
Tharu and Kumari Tharuni v. Nepal
Tharu and Kumari Tharuni v. Nepal CCPR/C/134/D/3199/2018 Communication number s : 3199/2018 Author: Puniram Tharu and Nira Kumari Tharuni Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 134 Country Nepal Submission date 28 Mar 2018 Date of decision 14 Mar JUTBCCPR/C/134/D/3199/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3080/en-US
Tharu et al. v. Nepal
Tharu et al. v. Nepal CCPR/C/114/D/2038/2011 Communication number s : 2038/2011 Author: Chhedulal Tharu Sara/Sarita Tharu Padam Tharu Sanchariya Tharu Birbal Tharu Thagani Tharu Bhagawati Tharu Tulsiram Tharu Phagani Tharu Mahango Tharu Parmeshwari Tharu JUTBCCPR/C/114/D/2038/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1994/en-US
Tharu et al. v. Nepal
Tharu et al. v. Nepal CCPR/C/114/D/2038/2011 Communication number s : 2038/2011 Author: Chhedulal Tharu Sara/Sarita Tharu Padam Tharu Sanchariya Tharu Birbal Tharu Thagani Tharu Bhagawati Tharu Tulsiram Tharu Phagani Tharu Mahango Tharu Parmeshwari Tharu JUTBCCPR/C/114/D/2038/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2027/en-US
The Vienna Intervention Centre against Domestic Violence and the Association for Women's Access to Justice on behalf of Banu Akbak, Gülen Khan, and Melissa Özdemir (descendants of the deceased) v. Austria
The Vienna Intervention Centre against Domestic Violence and the Association for Women s Access to Justice on behalf of Banu Akbak G len Khan and Melissa zdemir descendants of the deceased v. Austria CEDAW/C/39/D/6/2005 Communication number s : 006/2005 JUTBCEDAW/C/39/D/6/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1711/en-US
Third Evaluation Round Evaluation Report on Ireland Transparency of Party Funding (Theme II)
Third Evaluation Round Evaluation Report on Ireland Transparency of Party Funding Theme II IRL 2009 12 04 2010 01 25 Directorate General of Human Rights and Legal Affairs Directorate of Monitoring Strasbourg 4 December 2009 Public Greco Eval III Rep 2009 GRECOGreco-Eval-III-Rep-2009-4E-Ireland-Final-PF-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=Greco-Eval-III-Rep-2009-4E-Ireland-Final-PF-PUBLIC
Third Opinion on Montenegro
Third Opinion on Montenegro MNE ACFC/OP/III 2019 001rev 2019 03 07 2019 10 02 ACFC/OP/III 2019 001rev ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES Third Opinion on Montenegro Adopted on 7 March 2019 EXECUTIVE FCNMACFC/OP/III(2019)001revhttps://hudoc.fcnm.coe.int/eng?i=3rd_OP_Montenegro_en
Third Opinion on Norway
Third Opinion on Norway NOR ACFC/OP/III 2011 007 2011 06 30 Strasbourg 31 August 2011 Public ACFC/OP/III 2011 007 ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES Third Opinion on Norway adopted on 30 June 2011 FCNMACFC/OP/III(2011)007https://hudoc.fcnm.coe.int/eng?i=3rd_OP_Norway_en
Third Opinion on the Netherlands
Third Opinion on the Netherlands NLD ACFC/OP/III 2019 003 2019 03 06 2019 09 05 ACFC/OP/III 2019 003 ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES Third Opinion on the Netherlands 1 Adopted on 6 March 2019 FCNMACFC/OP/III(2019)003https://hudoc.fcnm.coe.int/eng?i=3rd_OP_Netherlands_en
Third Opinion on the Russian Federation
Third Opinion on the Russian Federation RUS ACFC/OP/III 2011 010 2011 11 24 Strasbourg 25 July 2012 Public ACFC/OP/III 2011 010 ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES Third Opinion on the Russian FCNMACFC/OP/III(2011)010https://hudoc.fcnm.coe.int/eng?i=3rd_OP_RussianFederation_en
Third Opinion on the United Kingdom
Third Opinion on the United Kingdom GBR ACFC/OP/III 2011 006 2011 06 30 Strasbourg 22 December 2011 Public ACFC/OP/III 2011 006 ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES Third Opinion on the United Kingdom FCNMACFC/OP/III(2011)006https://hudoc.fcnm.coe.int/eng?i=3rd_OP_UnitedKingdom_en
Third report on Austria
Third report on Austria AUT 2004 06 25 2005 02 15 CRI 2005 1 Third report on Austria Adopted on 25 June 2004 Strasbourg 15 February 2005 For further information about the work of the European Commission against Racism and Intolerance ECRI and about the ECRIAUT-CbC-III-2005-001-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=AUT-CbC-III-2005-001-ENG
Third report on Germany
Third report on Germany DEU 2003 12 05 2004 06 08 European Commission Against Racism and Intolerance Third report on Germany Adopted on 5 December 2003 For further information about the work of the European Commission against Racism and Intolerance ECRI ECRIDEU-CbC-III-2004-023-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=DEU-CbC-III-2004-023-ENG
Third report on Norway
Third report on Norway NOR 2003 06 27 2004 02 27 CRI 2004 3 European Commission Against Racism and Intolerance Third report on Norway Adopted on 27 June 2003 Strasbourg 27 January 2004 For further information about the work of the European Commission ECRINOR-CbC-III-2004-003-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=NOR-CbC-III-2004-003-ENG
Thomas James Hickey v. Australia
Thomas James Hickey v. Australia CCPR/C/111/D/1995/2010 Communication number s : 1995/2010 Author: Elizabeth Gail Hickey Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 111 Country Australia Submission date 14 Feb 2010 Date of decision 21 Jul 2014 JUTBCCPR/C/111/D/1995/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1858/en-US
Thomas (Samuel) v. Jamaica
Thomas Samuel v. Jamaica CCPR/C/65/D/614/1995 Communication number s : 614/1995 Author: Samuel Thomas Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 65 Country Jamaica Submission date 05 Jan 1995 Date of decision 31 Mar 1999 Comment: An individual JUTBCCPR/C/65/D/614/1995https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/766/en-US
Thuraisamy v. Canada
Thuraisamy v. Canada CCPR/C/106/D/1912/2009 Communication number s : 1912/2009 Author: Ganesaratnam Thuraisamy Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 106 Country Canada Submission date 28 Oct 2009 Date of decision 31 Oct 2012 Comment: The text of JUTBCCPR/C/106/D/1912/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1353/en-US
Timoshenko v. Belarus
Timoshenko v. Belarus CCPR/C/114/D/1950/2010 Communication number s : 1950/2010 Author: Viktor Timoshenko Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 114 Country Belarus Submission date 26 Jan 2009 Date of decision 22 Jul 2015 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/114/D/1950/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1964/en-US
Timur Ilyasov v. Kazakhstan
Timur Ilyasov v. Kazakhstan CCPR/C/111/D/2009/2010 Communication number s : 2009/2010 Author: Timur Ilyasov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 111 Country Kazakhstan Submission date 21 Jul 2010 Date of decision 23 Jul 2014 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/111/D/2009/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1861/en-US
Toala et al. v. New Zealand
Toala et al. v. New Zealand CCPR/C/70/D/675/1995 Communication number s : 675/1995 Author: Simalae Toala et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 70 Country New Zealand Submission date 19 Oct 1995 Date of decision 02 Nov 2000 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/70/D/675/1995https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/900/en-US
Tolipkhuzhaev v. Uzbekistan
Tolipkhuzhaev v. Uzbekistan CCPR/C/96/D/1280/2004 Communication number s : 1280/2004 Author: Akbarkhudzh Tolipkhuzhaev Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 96 Country Uzbekistan Submission date 06 May 2004 Date of decision 22 Jul 2009 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/96/D/1280/2004https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1526/en-US