Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 2127
11. Convention on the Rights of the Child
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 11. Convention on the Rights of the Child New York 20 November 1989 Entry into force : 2 September 1990 in accordance with article 49 1 . Registration : 2 September 1990 No. 27531 Status : UNIV-11https://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-11&chapter=4&clang=_en
8. Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 8. Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women New York 18 December 1979 1 Entry into force : 3 September 1981 in accordance with article 27 1 . Registration : 3 UNIV-8https://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-8&chapter=4&clang=_en
A.D. v. Spain
A.D. v. Spain CRC/C/80/D/14/2017 Communication number s : 014/2017 Author: A.D. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 80 Country Spain Submission date 17 Mar 2017 Date of decision 01 Feb 2019 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCRC/C/80/D/14/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2508/en-US
A/HRC/47/14: Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review - Rwanda
United Nations A/HRC/47/14 General Assembly Distr.: General 25 March 2021 Original: English Human Rights Council Forty seventh session 21 June 9 July 2021 Agenda item 6 Universal periodic review Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review UPRA/HRC/47/14https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/country-reports/ahrc4714-report-working-group-universal-periodic-review-rwanda
A. S. v. Russian Federation
A. S. v. Russian Federation CERD/C/79/D/45/2009 Communication number s : 045/2009 Author: A. S. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 79 Country Russian Federation Submission date 20 Aug 2009 Date of decision 26 Aug 2011 Comment: This JUTBCERD/C/79/D/45/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1726/en-US
A.W.P v. Denmark
A.W.P v. Denmark CCPR/C/109/D/1879/2009 Communication number s : 1879/2009 Author: A.W.P Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 109 Country Denmark Submission date 26 Mar 2009 Date of decision 01 Nov 2013 Comment: The text of an individual JUTBCCPR/C/109/D/1879/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1678/en-US
A v. Bosnia and Herzegovina
A v. Bosnia and Herzegovina CAT/C/67/D/854/2017 Communication number s : 854/2017 Author: A represented by counsel Philip Grant of TRIAL International Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 67 Country Bosnia and Herzegovina Submission date 01 Nov JUTBCAT/C/67/D/854/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2623/en-US
ABUYEVA AND OTHERS v. Russia
ABUYEVA AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 11/04/2011 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: These cases concern mainly violations resulting from or relating to the actions of Russian security forces during anti terrorist operations in the Northern Caucasus EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14124
Alzery v. Sweden
Alzery v. Sweden CCPR/C/88/D/1416/2005 Communication number s : 1416/2005 Author: Mohammed Alzery Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 88 Country Sweden Submission date 29 Jul 2005 Date of decision 25 Oct 2006 Comment: Pursuant to rule 90 of JUTBCCPR/C/88/D/1416/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1300/en-US
Andersen v. Denmark
Andersen v. Denmark CCPR/C/99/D/1868/2009 Communication number s : 1868/2009 Author: Fatima Andersen Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 99 Country Denmark Submission date 13 Jan 2009 Date of decision 26 Jul 2010 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/99/D/1868/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1586/en-US
BALSAN v. Romania
BALSAN v. Romania ROU 23/08/2017 00:00:00 15/09/2017 15:07:24 Case Description: This case concerns the failure of the investigating prosecuting and judicial authorities to comply with their positive obligation under Article 3 to protect the applicant from EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47601
BATI AND OTHERS v. Turkey
BATI AND OTHERS v. Turkey TUR 03/09/2004 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:53:30 Case Description: This group of judgments 1 concerns the ineffectiveness of investigations criminal prosecutions and disciplinary proceedings in relation to killing torture ill EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37206
BEKIR-OUSTA AND OTHERS v. Greece
BEKIR OUSTA AND OTHERS v. Greece GRC 11/01/2008 00:00:00 04/11/2016 16:42:14 Case Description: These cases concern violations of the right to freedom of association Article 11 due to the domestic courts rulings not to register associations Bekir Ousta and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-15567
BELOZOROV v. Russia
BELOZOROV v. Russia RUS 15/01/2016 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: These cases concern different violations linked to the unlawful transfer of individuals from Ukraine to the Russian Federation. In both cases the European Court found a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55229
BELOZOROV v. Ukraine
BELOZOROV v. Ukraine UKR 15/01/2016 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: These cases concern different violations linked to the unlawful transfer of individuals from Ukraine to the Russian Federation. In both cases the European Court found a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14094
Baumgarten v. Germany
Baumgarten v. Germany CCPR/C/78/D/960/2000 Communication number s : 960/2000 Author: Klaus Dieter Baumgarten Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 78 Country Germany Submission date 30 Sep 1998 Date of decision 31 Jul 2003 Comment: The Covenant JUTBCCPR/C/78/D/960/2000https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1061/en-US
Benaziza v. Algeria
Benaziza v. Algeria CCPR/C/99/D/1588/2007 Communication number s : 1588/2007 Author: Nedjma Benaziza Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 99 Country Algeria Submission date 13 Mar 2007 Date of decision 26 Jul 2010 Comment: The text of an JUTBCCPR/C/99/D/1588/2007https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1485/en-US
Bronson Blessington and Matthew Elliot v. Australia
Bronson Blessington and Matthew Elliot v. Australia CCPR/C/112/D/1968/2010 Communication number s : 1968/2010 Author: Bronson Blessington and Matthew Elliot represented by Human Rights Law Centre Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 112 Country JUTBCCPR/C/112/D/1968/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1890/en-US
CASE OF A.A. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF A.A. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 8000/08 THE AIRE CENTRE GBR 9/20/2011 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Violation of Art. 8 in case of expulsion to Nigeria Sections 3 5 a and 5 of the Immigration Act 1971 Sections 82 1 82 2 j and k and 84 of the ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0920JUD000800008https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-106282
CASE OF A AND B v. CROATIA
CASE OF A AND B v. CROATIA 7144/15 BOJIC I. VRANJICAN DEREK T. DRENSKI LASAN V. HRV 6/20/2019 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Effective investigation Procedural aspect No violation of Article 8 Right to respect for ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0620JUD000714415https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-194217