Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 2069
2nd RC4 Spain
2nd RC4 Spain ESP 2021 03 25 2021 09 30 I. INTRODUCTION The Fourth Round Evaluation Report on Spain was adopted at GRECO s 62nd Plenary Meeting 6 December 2013 and made public on 15 January 2014 following authorisation by Spain. The Fourth Evaluation GRECOGrecoRC4(2021)3-Final-eng-Spain-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=GrecoRC4(2021)3-Final-eng-Spain-PUBLIC
8. Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 8. Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women New York 18 December 1979 1 Entry into force : 3 September 1981 in accordance with article 27 1 . Registration : 3 UNIV-8https://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-8&chapter=4&clang=_en
A/HRC/47/14: Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review - Rwanda
United Nations A/HRC/47/14 General Assembly Distr.: General 25 March 2021 Original: English Human Rights Council Forty seventh session 21 June 9 July 2021 Agenda item 6 Universal periodic review Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review UPRA/HRC/47/14https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/country-reports/ahrc4714-report-working-group-universal-periodic-review-rwanda
A.M.B. v. Ecuador
A.M.B. v. Ecuador E/C.12/58/D/3/2014 Communication number s : 003/2014 Author: A.M.B. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 58 Country Ecuador Submission date Date of decision 20 Jun 2016 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBE/C.12/58/D/3/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2137/en-US
A.M. v. Australia
A.M. v. Australia CRPD/C/13/D/12/2013 Communication number s : 012/2013 Author: Australian Centre for Disability Law Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 13 Country Australia Submission date 18 Apr 2013 Date of decision 27 Mar 2015 JUTBCRPD/C/13/D/12/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2009/en-US
A v. Bosnia and Herzegovina
A v. Bosnia and Herzegovina CAT/C/67/D/854/2017 Communication number s : 854/2017 Author: A represented by counsel Philip Grant of TRIAL International Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 67 Country Bosnia and Herzegovina Submission date 01 Nov JUTBCAT/C/67/D/854/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2623/en-US
ARMENIA: REPORT OF THE SUBCOMMITTEE
ARMENIA: REPORT OF THE SUBCOMMITTEE CAT/OP/ARM/2 NULL 2017 02 22T00:00:00 SPT United Nations CAT/OP/ARM/2 Optional Protocol to the Distr.: General Convention against Torture 22 February 2017 and Other Cruel Inhuman Original: English English French Russian UHRICAT/OP/ARM/2https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/cd1a2951-d987-47c5-9623-51169c4ce79b
Anne Nuorgam et al. v. Finland
Anne Nuorgam et al. v. Finland CERD/C/106/D/59/2016 Communication number s : 59/2016 Author: Anne Nuorgam et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 106 Country Finland Submission date 14 Mar 2016 Date of decision 22 Apr 2022 Comment: This JUTBCERD/C/106/D/59/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3745/en-US
BALSAN v. Romania
BALSAN v. Romania ROU 23/08/2017 00:00:00 15/09/2017 15:07:24 Case Description: This case concerns the failure of the investigating prosecuting and judicial authorities to comply with their positive obligation under Article 3 to protect the applicant from EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47601
Bakhtiyari v. Australia
Bakhtiyari v. Australia CCPR/C/79/D/1069/2002 Communication number s : 1069/2002 Author: Ali Aqsar Bakhtiyari and Roqaiha Bakhtiyari Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 79 Country Australia Submission date 25 Mar 2002 Date of decision 29 Oct JUTBCCPR/C/79/D/1069/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1092/en-US
Baroy v. Philippines
Baroy v. Philippines CCPR/C/79/D/1045/2002 Communication number s : 1045/2002 Author: Alfredo Baroy Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 79 Country Philippines Submission date 04 Jan 2002 Date of decision 31 Oct 2003 Comment: Under rule JUTBCCPR/C/79/D/1045/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/372/en-US
Baumgarten v. Germany
Baumgarten v. Germany CCPR/C/78/D/960/2000 Communication number s : 960/2000 Author: Klaus Dieter Baumgarten Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 78 Country Germany Submission date 30 Sep 1998 Date of decision 31 Jul 2003 Comment: The Covenant JUTBCCPR/C/78/D/960/2000https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1061/en-US
Belemvire v. Republic of Moldova
Belemvire v. Republic of Moldova CERD/C/94/D/57/2015 Communication number s : 057/2015 Author: Marcel Moraru Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 103 Country Republic of Moldova Submission date 21 Apr 2015 Date of decision 24 Nov 2017 Comment: JUTBCERD/C/94/D/57/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2605/en-US
Ben Said v. Norway
Ben Said v. Norway CCPR/C/68/D/767/1997 Communication number s : 767/1997 Author: Zouhair Ben Said Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 68 Country Norway Submission date 28 Oct 1996 Date of decision 29 Mar 2000 Comment: An individual opinion JUTBCCPR/C/68/D/767/1997https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/898/en-US
Broeks v. Netherlands
Broeks v. Netherlands CCPR/C/29/D/172/1984 Communication number s : 172/1984 Author: S.W.M. Broeks represented by Marie Emmie Diepstraten Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 29 Country Netherlands Submission date 01 Jun 1984 Date of decision JUTBCCPR/C/29/D/172/1984https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/653/en-US
C. v. Australia
C. v. Australia CCPR/C/76/D/900/1999 Communication number s : 900/1999 Author: C. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 76 Country Australia Submission date 23 Nov 1999 Date of decision 28 Oct 2002 Comment: Under rule 85 of the Committee s rules JUTBCCPR/C/76/D/900/1999https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1026/en-US
CASE OF A AND B v. NORWAY
CASE OF A AND B v. NORWAY 24130/11 29758/11 KJELDAHL R. NOR 11/15/2016 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 Right not to be tried or punished twice general Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 Right not to be tried or punished twice Criminal ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1115JUD002413011https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-168972
CASE OF A AND B v. ROMANIA
CASE OF A AND B v. ROMANIA 48442/16 48831/16 DRAGOMIR D. E. ROU 6/2/2020 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objections dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Art. 35 3 a Abuse of the right of application No violation of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0602JUD004844216https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-202621
CASE OF A. AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF A. AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 3455/05 BIRNBERG PIERCE AND PARTNERS GBR 2/19/2009 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 3 No violation of Art. 13 3 Preliminary objection rejected Government not precluded from raising defence under Art. 5 1 f or ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0219JUD000345505https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-91403
CASE OF A, B AND C v. IRELAND
CASE OF A B AND C v. IRELAND 25579/05 KAY J. IRL 12/16/2010 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed non exhaustion of domestic remedies Remainder inadmissible No violation of Art. 8 Violation of Art. 8 Non pecuniary damage award ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1216JUD002557905https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-102332