Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 21 - 40 of 1902
B.W.M.Z. v. Netherlands
B.W.M.Z. v. Netherlands CCPR/C/107/D/1788/2008 Communication number s : 1788/2008 Author: B.W.M.Z. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 107 Country Netherlands Submission date 26 Jun 2007 Date of decision 25 Mar 2013 Comment: Pursuant to JUTBCCPR/C/107/D/1788/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1331/en-US
BAHRAIN: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
BAHRAIN: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CERD/C/BHR/CO/8 14 NULL 2022 12 07T00:00:00 CERD United Nations CERD/C/BHR/CO/8 14 International Convention on Distr.: General 29 December 2022 the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination Original: English UHRICERD/C/BHR/CO/8-14https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/d7328b3e-40dd-49ec-9dc4-19cea261976b
BELARUS: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
BELARUS: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CCPR/C/BLR/CO/5 NULL 2018 11 22T00:00:00 CCPR United Nations CCPR/C/BLR/CO/5 International Covenant on Distr.: General 22 November 2018 Civil and Political Rights Original: English Human Rights Committee Concluding UHRICCPR/C/BLR/CO/5https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/c58ec660-a181-4765-ac2d-0d021de10d06
BELGIUM: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
BELGIUM: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CERD/C/BEL/CO/20 22 NULL 2021 05 21T00:00:00 CERD United Nations CERD/C/BEL/CO/20 22 International Convention on Distr.: General 21 May 2021 the Elimination of All Forms English of Racial Discrimination Original: French UHRICERD/C/BEL/CO/20-22https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/2d0949c3-d23b-471f-b82a-7cc8603ecdbf
Baban v. Australia
Baban v. Australia CCPR/C/78/D/1014/2001 Communication number s : 1014/2001 Author: Omar Sharif Baban Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 78 Country Australia Submission date 19 Dec 2000 Date of decision 06 Aug 2003 Comment: Under rule 86 of JUTBCCPR/C/78/D/1014/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1057/en-US
Berlinov v. Belarus
Berlinov v. Belarus CCPR/C/133/D/2708/2015 Communication number s : 2708/2015 Author: Petr Berlinov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 133 Country Belarus Submission date 18 Mar 2015 Date of decision 18 Oct 2021 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/133/D/2708/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3166/en-US
Borzov v. Estonia
Borzov v. Estonia CCPR/C/81/D/1136/2002 Communication number s : 1136/2002 Author: Vjatseslav Borzov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 81 Country Estonia Submission date 02 Nov 2001 Date of decision 26 Jul 2004 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/81/D/1136/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1129/en-US
Brandsma v. Netherlands
Brandsma v. Netherlands CCPR/C/80/D/977/2001 Communication number s : 977/2001 Author: R.P.C.W.M. Brandsma Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 80 Country Netherlands Submission date 30 Oct 2000 Date of decision 01 Apr 2004 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/80/D/977/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/376/en-US
Broeks v. Netherlands
Broeks v. Netherlands CCPR/C/29/D/172/1984 Communication number s : 172/1984 Author: S.W.M. Broeks represented by Marie Emmie Diepstraten Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 29 Country Netherlands Submission date 01 Jun 1984 Date of decision JUTBCCPR/C/29/D/172/1984https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/653/en-US
Brok and Brokova v. Czech Republic
Brok and Brokova v. Czech Republic CCPR/C/73/D/774/1997 Communication number s : 774/1997 Author: Robert Brok deceased and his surviving spouse Dagmar Brokova Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 73 Country Czech Republic Submission date 23 Dec JUTBCCPR/C/73/D/774/1997https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/947/en-US
Bujdosó v. Hungary
Bujdos v. Hungary CRPD/C/10/D/4/2011 Communication number s : 004/2011 Author: J nos Fiala Disability Rights Center Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 10 Country Hungary Submission date 14 Sep 2011 Date of decision 09 Sep 2013 Comment: This JUTBCRPD/C/10/D/4/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1988/en-US
Burgess v. Australia
Burgess v. Australia CCPR/C/85/D/1012/2001 Communication number s : 1012/2001 Author: Brian John Lawrence Burgess Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 85 Country Australia Submission date 13 Jul 2001 Date of decision 21 Oct 2005 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/85/D/1012/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1202/en-US
C. T. and K. M. v. Sweden
C. T. and K. M. v. Sweden CAT/C/37/D/279/2005 Communication number s : 279/2005 Author: C.T. and K.M. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 37 Country Sweden Submission date 07 Sep 2005 Date of decision 17 Nov 2006 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/37/D/279/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/102/en-US
C. v. Australia
C. v. Australia CCPR/C/76/D/900/1999 Communication number s : 900/1999 Author: C. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 76 Country Australia Submission date 23 Nov 1999 Date of decision 28 Oct 2002 Comment: Under rule 85 of the Committee s rules JUTBCCPR/C/76/D/900/1999https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1026/en-US
CASE OF A.A. v. SWITZERLAND
CASE OF A.A. v. SWITZERLAND 58802/12 MOTZ S. HASSAN T. CHE 1/7/2014 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 13 3 Right to an effective remedy Article 13 Effective remedy Article 3 Prohibition of torture Expulsion 350 620 444 110 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0107JUD005880212https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-139903
CASE OF A, B AND C v. IRELAND
CASE OF A B AND C v. IRELAND 25579/05 KAY J. IRL 12/16/2010 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed non exhaustion of domestic remedies Remainder inadmissible No violation of Art. 8 Violation of Art. 8 Non pecuniary damage award ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1216JUD002557905https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-102332
CASE OF A.E. v. BULGARIA
CASE OF A.E. v. BULGARIA 53891/20 DOBREVA N. BGR 5/23/2023 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0523JUD005389120https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-224778
CASE OF A.P., GARÇON AND NICOT v. FRANCE
CASE OF A.P. GAR ON AND NICOT v. FRANCE 79885/12 52471/13 52596/13 SCP GATINEAU FATTACCINI SCP THOUIN PALAT BOUCARD FOURNIER J. PIERRAT E. FRA 4/6/2017 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0406JUD007988512https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-172913
CASE OF A. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF A. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 35373/97 N/A GBR 12/17/2002 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 6 1 as regards parliamentary immunity No violation of Art. 6 1 as regards lack of legal aid No violation of Art. 8 No violation of Art. 14 6 No violation of Art. ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:1217JUD003537397https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-60822
CASE OF ABDI IBRAHIM v. NORWAY
CASE OF ABDI IBRAHIM v. NORWAY 15379/16 LUTINA A. NOR 12/10/2021 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 1 Respect for family life read in the light of Article 9 Art. 9 Freedom of thought conscience and ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1210JUD001537916https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-214433