Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 534
A.C.G. et al. v. Spain
A.C.G. et al. v. Spain E/C.12/60/D/17/2016 Communication number s : 017/2016 Author: A.C.G. et al. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 60 Country Spain Submission date 23 Sep 2016 Date of decision 22 Feb 2017 Comment: This document has JUTBE/C.12/60/D/17/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2420/en-US
A.J. v. United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
A.J. v. United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland CEDAW/C/74/D/126/2018 Communication number s : 126/2018 Author: A.J. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 74 Country United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland JUTBCEDAW/C/74/D/126/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2666/en-US
A and B v. Denmark v. Denmark
A and B v. Denmark v. Denmark CCPR/C/117/D/2291/2013 Communication number s : 2291/2013 Author: A and B Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 117 Country Denmark Submission date 01 Oct 2013 Date of decision 13 Jul 2016 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/117/D/2291/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2128/en-US
ALGERIA: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
ALGERIA: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CRPD/C/DZA/CO/1 NULL 2019 06 26T00:00:00 CRPD United Nations CRPD/C/DZA/CO/1 Convention on the Rights Distr.: General 27 June 2019 of Persons with Disabilities Original: English Committee on the Rights of Persons with UHRICRPD/C/DZA/CO/1https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/606fc556-e451-4245-bb93-1b59cf06b169
Adam Harun v. Switzerland
Adam Harun v. Switzerland CAT/C/65/D/758/2016 Communication number s : 758/2016 Author: Adam Harun represented by counsels Gabriella Tau et Boris Wijkstr m Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 65 Country Switzerland Submission date 08 Jul 2016 JUTBCAT/C/65/D/758/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2476/en-US
Alarcón Flores et al v. Ecuador
Alarc n Flores et al v. Ecuador E/C.12/62/D/14/2016 Communication number s : 014/2016 Author: Ana Esther Alarc n Flores et al Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 62 Country Ecuador Submission date 05 Mar 2015 Date of decision 04 Oct 2017 JUTBE/C.12/62/D/14/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2410/en-US
Albareda [et al.] v. Uruguay
Albareda et al. v. Uruguay CCPR/C/103/D/1637/2007 1757 1765/2008 Communication number s : 1757/2008 1765/2008 1637/2007 Author: N stor Julio Canessa Albareda Mary Mabel Barindelli Bassini Graciela Besio Abal Mar a del Jes s Curbelo Romano Celia Dinorah JUTBCCPR/C/103/D/1637/2007,1757&1765/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1648/en-US
B. & C. v. Czech Republic
B. C. v. Czech Republic CCPR/C/113/D/1967/2010 Communication number s : 1967/2010 Author: B. and C. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 113 Country Czech Republic Submission date 18 Sep 2009 Date of decision 02 Apr 2015 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/113/D/1967/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1944/en-US
B.M.I. and N.A.K. v. Denmark
B.M.I. and N.A.K. v. Denmark CCPR/C/118/D/2569/2015 Communication number s : 2569/2015 Author: B.M.I. and N.A.K. represented by counsel Hannah Krog Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 118 Country Denmark Submission date 06 Feb 2015 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/118/D/2569/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2229/en-US
B.Z. et al. v. Albania
B.Z. et al. v. Albania CCPR/C/121/D/2837/2016 Communication number s : 2837/2016 Author: B.Z. et al. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 121 Country Albania Submission date 13 Jan 2016 Date of decision 08 Nov 2017 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/121/D/2837/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2362/en-US
BRAUER v. Germany
BRAUER v. Germany DEU 28/08/2009 00:00:00 15/11/2016 14:32:10 Case Description: Discrimination and protection of family life: Discriminatory interference with the right to family life in that the applicant born out of wedlock was unable to assert her EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-38440
Bakhtiyari v. Australia
Bakhtiyari v. Australia CCPR/C/79/D/1069/2002 Communication number s : 1069/2002 Author: Ali Aqsar Bakhtiyari and Roqaiha Bakhtiyari Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 79 Country Australia Submission date 25 Mar 2002 Date of decision 29 Oct JUTBCCPR/C/79/D/1069/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1092/en-US
Bergauer et al. v. Czech Republic
Bergauer et al. v. Czech Republic CCPR/C/100/D/1748/2008 Communication number s : 1748/2008 Author: Josef Bergauer et al. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 100 Country Czech Republic Submission date 05 Oct 2007 Date of decision 28 Oct JUTBCCPR/C/100/D/1748/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1553/en-US
Bibaud v. Canada
Bibaud v. Canada CCPR/C/98/D/1747/2008 Communication number s : 1747/2008 Author: Mireille Boisvert Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 98 Country Canada Submission date 23 Jul 2008 Date of decision 19 Mar 2010 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/98/D/1747/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1577/en-US
CASE OF A.A. AND OTHERS v. NORTH MACEDONIA
CASE OF A.A. AND OTHERS v. NORTH MACEDONIA 55798/16 55808/16 55817/16 55820/16 55823/16 GERICKE C. MKD 4/5/2022 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 34 Individual applications Art. 34 Victim Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 35 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0405JUD005579816https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-216861
CASE OF A.A. v. SWITZERLAND
CASE OF A.A. v. SWITZERLAND 58802/12 MOTZ S. HASSAN T. CHE 1/7/2014 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 13 3 Right to an effective remedy Article 13 Effective remedy Article 3 Prohibition of torture Expulsion 350 620 444 110 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0107JUD005880212https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-139903
CASE OF A. AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF A. AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 3455/05 BIRNBERG PIERCE AND PARTNERS GBR 2/19/2009 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 3 No violation of Art. 13 3 Preliminary objection rejected Government not precluded from raising defence under Art. 5 1 f or ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0219JUD000345505https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-91403
CASE OF A, B AND C v. IRELAND
CASE OF A B AND C v. IRELAND 25579/05 KAY J. IRL 12/16/2010 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed non exhaustion of domestic remedies Remainder inadmissible No violation of Art. 8 Violation of Art. 8 Non pecuniary damage award ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1216JUD002557905https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-102332
CASE OF A.H. AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
CASE OF A.H. AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA 6033/13 8927/13 10549/13 12275/13 23890/13 26309/13 27161/13 29197/13 32224/13 32331/13 32351/13 32368/13 37173/13 38490/13 42340/13 42403/13 INTERNATIONAL PROTECTION CENTRE IN MOSCOW O REAR I. RUS 1/17/2017 12:00:00 AM ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0117JUD000603313https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-170390
CASE OF AĞTAŞ v. TURKEY
CASE OF A TA v. TURKEY 33240/96 KILIC O. TUR 2/2/2006 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed non exhaustion of domestic remedies No violation of Art. 3 and 8 and of P1 1 No violation of Art. 5 1 Not necessary to examine Art. 6 1 Violation of Art. 13 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0202JUD003324096https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-72238