Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 30
A.J. v. United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
A.J. v. United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland CEDAW/C/74/D/126/2018 Communication number s : 126/2018 Author: A.J. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 74 Country United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland JUTBCEDAW/C/74/D/126/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2666/en-US
Al Adam v. Saudi Arabia
Al Adam v. Saudi Arabia CRPD/C/20/D/38/2016 Communication number s : 038/2016 Author: Al Adam Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 20 Country Saudi Arabia Submission date 05 May 2016 Date of decision 20 Sep 2018 Comment: This document has no JUTBCRPD/C/20/D/38/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2513/en-US
Alonzo et al. v. Philippines
Alonzo et al. v. Philippines CEDAW/C/84/D/155/2020 Communication number s : 155/2020 Author: Natalia M. Alonzo Perla B. Balingit Virginia M. Bangit Francia A. Buco Dela Paz B. Culala Belen Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 84 Country JUTBCEDAW/C/84/D/155/2020https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3765/en-US
CASE OF ABU ZUBAYDAH v. LITHUANIA
CASE OF ABU ZUBAYDAH v. LITHUANIA 46454/11 DUFFY H. MICKUM IV G.B. MARGULIES J. LTU 5/31/2018 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 34 Individual applications Art. 34 Victim Preliminary objections joined to merits and dismissed Art. 35 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0531JUD004645411https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-183687
CASE OF AL NASHIRI v. POLAND
CASE OF AL NASHIRI v. POLAND 28761/11 GOLDSTON J.A. SKILBECK R. SINGH A. HOLLANDER N. POL 7/24/2014 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Remainder ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0724JUD002876111https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-146044
CASE OF AL NASHIRI v. ROMANIA
CASE OF AL NASHIRI v. ROMANIA 33234/12 GOLDSTON J.A. SKILBECK R. SINGH A. HOLLANDER N. HATNEANU D.O. ROU 5/31/2018 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objections joined to merits and dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0531JUD003323412https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-183685
CASE OF HILAL v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF HILAL v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 45276/99 N/A GBR 3/6/2001 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 3 No violation of Art. 13 No separate issues under Art. 6 and 8 Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Costs and expenses award 350 193 192 444 110 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0306JUD004527699https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-59339
CASE OF HUSAYN (ABU ZUBAYDAH) v. POLAND
CASE OF HUSAYN ABU ZUBAYDAH v. POLAND 7511/13 HUGHES P. DUFFY H. VANDOVA V. MARGULIES J. MICKUM G.B. JANKOWSKI B. POL 7/24/2014 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0724JUD000751113https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-146047
CASE OF NADA v. SWITZERLAND
CASE OF NADA v. SWITZERLAND 10593/08 MCBRIDE J. CHE 9/12/2012 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objections dismissed Article 35 3 Ratione personae Preliminary objections dismissed Article 34 Victim Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed Article 35 3 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0912JUD001059308https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-113118
CASE OF R.L. AND OTHERS v. DENMARK
CASE OF R.L. AND OTHERS v. DENMARK 52629/11 TRIER T. DNK 3/7/2017 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 Positive obligations Article 8 1 Respect for family life Respect for private life Sections 23 24 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0307JUD005262911https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-171776
CASE OF SARGSYAN v. AZERBAIJAN
CASE OF SARGSYAN v. AZERBAIJAN 40167/06 GASPARYAN N. OHANYAN K. AZE 6/16/2015 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Article 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Preliminary objection dismissed Article 35 3 Continuing situation Preliminary objection ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0616JUD004016706https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-155662
CASE OF SUFI AND ELMI v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF SUFI AND ELMI v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 8319/07 11449/07 MOLE N. GBR 6/28/2011 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 3 in case of expulsion to Somalia Section 103A of the Nationality Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 Paragraph 353 of the Immigration Rules ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0628JUD000831907https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-105434
CASE OF TRABELSI v. BELGIUM
CASE OF TRABELSI v. BELGIUM 140/10 CHATEAU A. BEL 9/4/2014 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objections dismissed Article 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Extradition the United ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0904JUD000014010https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-146372
G.B.M. v. Sweden
G.B.M. v. Sweden CAT/C/49/D/435/2010 Communication number s : 435/2010 Author: G.B.M. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 49 Country Sweden Submission date 05 Oct 2010 Date of decision 14 Nov 2012 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/49/D/435/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/16/en-US
G.D. v. Bulgaria
G.D. v. Bulgaria CEDAW/C/80/D/142/2019 Communication number s : 142/2019 Author: G.D. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 80 Country Bulgaria Submission date 05 Mar 2019 Date of decision 25 Oct 2021 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/80/D/142/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3043/en-US
Independent Expert on Democratic Republic of the Congo
Report to HRC E/CN.4/2006/113 from 16 August 2005 to 27 August 2005 15 February 2006 Independent Expert on Democratic Republic of the Congo Democratic Republic of the Congo UNITED NATIONS E Economic and Social Distr. GENERAL Council E/CN.4/2006/113 15 UNSPE/CN.4/2006/113https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=E%2fCN.4%2f2006%2f113&Lang=en
J.B.N.K. v. Sweden
J.B.N.K. v. Sweden CCPR/C/128/D/2984/2017 Communication number s : 2984/2017 Author: J.B.N.K. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 128 Country Sweden Submission date 22 May 2017 Date of decision 13 Mar 2020 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/128/D/2984/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2833/en-US
J.D. v. Czech Republic
J.D. v. Czech Republic CEDAW/C/73/D/102/2016 Communication number s : 102/2016 Author: J.D. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 73 Country Czech Republic Submission date 17 Feb 2016 Date of decision 16 Jul 2019 Comment: This document has JUTBCEDAW/C/73/D/102/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2659/en-US
K.K. v. Russian Federation
K.K. v. Russian Federation CEDAW/C/72/D/98/2016 Communication number s : 098/2015 Author: K.K. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 72 Country Russian Federation Submission date 07 Sep 2015 Date of decision 25 Feb 2019 Comment: This document JUTBCEDAW/C/72/D/98/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2653/en-US
K.S. v. Poland
K.S. v. Poland CEDAW/C/76/D/128/2018 Communication number s : 128/2018 Author: K.S. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 76 Country Poland Submission date 11 Apr 2017 Date of decision 06 Jul 2020 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/76/D/128/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3034/en-US