Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 2321 - 2340 of 3100
Gillot et al. v. France
Gillot et al. v. France CCPR/C/75/D/932/2000 Communication number s : 932/2000 Author: Marie H l ne Gillot et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 75 Country France Submission date 25 Jun 1999 Date of decision 15 Jul 2002 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/75/D/932/2000https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1011/en-US
Goekce v. Austria
Goekce v. Austria CEDAW/C/39/D/5/2005 Communication number s : 005/2005 Author: Hakan Goekce Handan Goekce and Guelue Goekce descendants of the deceased Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 39 Country Austria Submission date 21 Jul 2004 Date of JUTBCEDAW/C/39/D/5/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1715/en-US
Goldade et al v. Belarus
Goldade et al v. Belarus CCPR/C/130/D/2330/2014 Communication number s : 2330/2014 Author: Svetlana Goldade Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 130 Country Belarus Submission date 11 Apr 2013 Date of decision 06 Nov 2020 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/130/D/2330/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3104/en-US
Gomaríz Valera v. Spain
Gomar z Valera v. Spain CCPR/C/84/D/1095/2002 Communication number s : 1095/2002 Author: Bernardino Gomar z Valera Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 84 Country Spain Submission date 04 Sep 1997 Date of decision 22 Jul 2005 Comment: An JUTBCCPR/C/84/D/1095/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1191/en-US
Gonçalves et al. v. Portugal
Gon alves et al. v. Portugal CCPR/C/98/D/1565/2007 Communication number s : 1565/2007 Author: Aur lio Gon alves et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 98 Country Portugal Submission date 31 Jan 2007 Date of decision 18 Mar 2010 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/98/D/1565/2007https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1563/en-US
Government comments on the first report on Turkey
Government comments on the first report on Turkey TUR 1998 11 28 1999 11 09 APPENDIX The following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in Turkey ECRI wishes to point out that the analysis contained in its ECRITUR-COM-I-1999-052-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=TUR-COM-I-1999-052-ENG
Government comments on the fourth report on Portugal
Government comments on the fourth report on Portugal PRT 2013 03 21 2013 07 09 APPENDIX: GOVERNMENT S VIEWPOINT The following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in Portugal ECRI in accordance with its ECRIPRT-COM-IV-2013-020-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=PRT-COM-IV-2013-020-ENG
Government comments on the second report on Croatia
Government comments on the second report on Croatia HRV 2000 12 15 2001 07 03 The following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in Croatia. APPENDIX ECRI wishes to point out that the analysis contained in ECRIHRV-COM-II-2001-034-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=HRV-COM-II-2001-034-ENG
Government comments on the second report on Germany
Government comments on the second report on Germany DEU 2000 12 15 2001 07 03 APPENDIX The following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in Germany. ECRI wishes to point out that the analysis contained in ECRIDEU-COM-II-2001-036-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=DEU-COM-II-2001-036-ENG
Government comments on the second report on Norway
Government comments on the second report on Norway NOR 1999 12 10 2000 06 27 The following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in Norway. APPENDIX ECRI wishes to point out that the analysis contained in ECRINOR-COM-II-2000-033-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=NOR-COM-II-2000-033-ENG
Government comments on the third report on Switzerland
Government comments on the third report on Switzerland CHE 2003 06 27 2004 01 27 APPENDIX The following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in Switzerland ECRI wishes to point out that the analysis ECRICHE-COM-III-2004-005-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=CHE-COM-III-2004-005-ENG
Government comments on the third report on the Czech Republic
Government comments on the third report on the Czech Republic CZE 2003 12 05 2004 06 08 APPENDIX The following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in the Czech Republic ECRI wishes to point out that the ECRICZE-COM-III-2004-022-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=CZE-COM-III-2004-022-ENG
Govsha, Syritsa and Mezyak v. Belarus
Govsha Syritsa and Mezyak v. Belarus CCPR/C/105/D/1790/2008 Communication number s : 1790/2008 Author: Sergei Govsha Viktor Syritsa and Viktor Mezyak Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 105 Country Belarus Submission date 31 Mar 2008 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/105/D/1790/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1246/en-US
Grainne Sherlock v. Australia
Grainne Sherlock v. Australia CRPD/C/24/D/20/2014 Communication number s : 20/2014 Author: Grainne Sherlock Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 24 Country Australia Submission date 24 Feb 2014 Date of decision 19 Mar 2021 Comment: This JUTBCRPD/C/24/D/20/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3069/en-US
Grishkovtsov v. Belarus
Grishkovtsov v. Belarus CCPR/C/113/D/2013/2010 Communication number s : 2013/2010 Author: Oleg Grishkovtsov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 113 Country Belarus Submission date 06 Dec 2010 Date of decision 01 Apr 2015 Comment: Imposition of JUTBCCPR/C/113/D/2013/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1915/en-US
Gurbanova and Muradhasilova v. Azerbaijan
Gurbanova and Muradhasilova v. Azerbaijan CCPR/C/131/D/2952/2017 Communication number s : 2952/2017 Author: Matanat Baliyar Gizi Gurbanova and Saadat Baliyar Gizi Muradhasilova Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 131 Country Azerbaijan JUTBCCPR/C/131/D/2952/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3249/en-US
H.A. and G.H. v. Netherlands
H.A. and G.H. v. Netherlands CAT/C/63/D/719/2015 Communication number s : 719/2015 Author: H.A. and G.H. represented by counsel P.J. Schuller Type of decision: Admissibility decision Session No 63 Country Netherlands Submission date 02 Dec 2015 Date of JUTBCAT/C/63/D/719/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2745/en-US
H.A. v. Denmark
H.A. v. Denmark CCPR/C/123/D/2328/2014 Communication number s : 2328/2014 Author: H.A. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 123 Country Denmark Submission date 06 Jan 2014 Date of decision 09 Jul 2018 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/123/D/2328/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2493/en-US
H.A. v. Sweden
H.A. v. Sweden CAT/C/63/D/744/2016 Communication number s : 744/2016 Author: H.A. represented by counsel Viktoria Nystr m Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 63 Country Sweden Submission date 08 Apr 2016 Date of decision 11 May 2018 Comment: JUTBCAT/C/63/D/744/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2737/en-US
H.B.A. et al. v. Canada
H.B.A. et al. v. Canada CAT/C/56/D/536/2013 Communication number s : 536/2013 Author: H.B.A. et al. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 56 Country Canada Submission date 14 Nov 2012 Date of decision 02 Dec 2015 Comment: This document has JUTBCAT/C/56/D/536/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2070/en-US