Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 401 - 420 of 651
Dranichnikov v. Australia
Dranichnikov v. Australia CCPR/C/88/D/1291/2004 Communication number s : 1291/2004 Author: Olga Dranichnikov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 88 Country Australia Submission date 01 Jun 2004 Date of decision 20 Oct 2006 Comment: Pursuant to JUTBCCPR/C/88/D/1291/2004https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1327/en-US
Dudko v. Australia
Dudko v. Australia CCPR/C/90/D/1347/2005 Communication number s : 1347/2005 Author: Lucy Dudko Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 90 Country Australia Submission date 01 Jun 2004 Date of decision 23 Jul 2007 Comment: Pursuant to rule 90 of JUTBCCPR/C/90/D/1347/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1368/en-US
Dumont de Chassart v. Italy
Dumont de Chassart v. Italy CCPR/C/87/D/1229/2003/Rev.1 Communication number s : 1229/2003 Author: Noel L opold Dumont de Chassart Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 87 Country Italy Submission date 25 Mar 2003 Date of decision 25 Jul JUTBCCPR/C/87/D/1229/2003/Rev.1https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3222/en-US
E. B. v. New Zealand
E. B. v. New Zealand CCPR/C/89/D/1368/2005 Communication number s : 1368/2005 Author: E. B. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 89 Country New Zealand Submission date 24 Dec 2004 Date of decision 16 Mar 2007 Comment: An individual opinion JUTBCCPR/C/89/D/1368/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1333/en-US
E.H.P. et al. v. Canada
E.H.P. et al. v. Canada CCPR/C/17/D/67/1980 Communication number s : 067/1980 Author: E.H.P. name deleted on her own behalf and as chairperson of the Port Hope Environmental Group behalf of the present and future generations of Port Hope Ontario Canada JUTBCCPR/C/17/D/67/1980https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/497/en-US
E.J.V.M. v. Sweden
E.J.V.M. v. Sweden CAT/C/31/D/213/2002 Communication number s : 213/2002 Author: E.J.V.M. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 31 Country Sweden Submission date 17 May 2002 Date of decision 14 Nov 2003 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/31/D/213/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/157/en-US
E.L. v. Canada
E.L. v. Canada CAT/C/48/D/370/2009 Communication number s : 370/2009 Author: E.L. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 48 Country Canada Submission date 14 Jan 2009 Date of decision 21 May 2012 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCAT/C/48/D/370/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/33/en-US
E.M.M.A. v. Sweden
E.M.M.A. v. Sweden CAT/C/74/D/960/2019 Communication number s : 960/2019 Author: E.M.M.A. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 74 Country Sweden Submission date 03 Oct 2019 Date of decision 21 Jul 2022 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/74/D/960/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3326/en-US
El Rgeig v. Switzerland
El Rgeig v. Switzerland CAT/C/37/D/280/2005 Communication number s : 280/2005 Author: Gamal El Rgeig Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 37 Country Switzerland Submission date 15 Sep 2005 Date of decision 15 Nov 2006 Comment: This document has JUTBCAT/C/37/D/280/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/103/en-US
Elmi v. Australia
Elmi v. Australia CAT/C/22/D/120/1998 Communication number s : 120/1998 Author: Sadiq Shek Elmi Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 22 Country Australia Submission date 17 Nov 1998 Date of decision 14 May 1999 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/22/D/120/1998https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/260/en-US
Ersaliev v. Uzbekistan
Ersaliev v. Uzbekistan CCPR/C/131/D/2574/2015 Communication number s : 2574/2015 Author: Ulugbek Ersaliev Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 131 Country Uzbekistan Submission date 24 Jul 2014 Date of decision 22 Mar 2021 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/131/D/2574/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3239/en-US
Evaluation Report Bulgaria
Evaluation Report Bulgaria BGR 2022 12 02 2023 01 19 Adoption: 2 December 2022 Publication: 19 January 2023 Public GrecoEval5Rep 2022 9 FIFTH EVALUATION ROUND Preventing corruption and promoting integrity in central governments top executive functions and GRECOGrecoEval5Rep-2022-9-Final-eng-EvaluationReport-Bulgaria-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=GrecoEval5Rep-2022-9-Final-eng-EvaluationReport-Bulgaria-PUBLIC
F.A. v. Denmark
F.A. v. Denmark CCPR/C/130/D/2671/2015 Communication number s : 2671/2015 Author: F.A. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 130 Country Denmark Submission date 05 Nov 2015 Date of decision 06 Nov 2020 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/130/D/2671/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3268/en-US
F.J. et al. v. Australia
F.J. et al. v. Australia CCPR/C/116/D/2233/2013 Communication number s : 2233/2013 Author: F.J. et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 116 Country Australia Submission date 03 Dec 2012 Date of decision 22 Mar 2016 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/116/D/2233/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3092/en-US
F.K.A.G. et al. v. Australia
F.K.A.G. et al. v. Australia CCPR/C/108/D/2094/2011 Communication number s : 2094/2011 Author: F.K.A.G. et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 108 Country Australia Submission date 28 Aug 2011 Date of decision 26 Jul 2013 Comment: The text JUTBCCPR/C/108/D/2094/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1673/en-US
F.K.M. v. Netherlands
F.K.M. v. Netherlands CAT/C/74/D/954/2019 Communication number s : 954/2019 Author: F.K.M. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 74 Country Netherlands Submission date 20 Jun 2019 Date of decision 21 Jul 2022 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/74/D/954/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3458/en-US
F. and G. v. Denmark
F. and G. v. Denmark CCPR/C/119/D/2530/2015 Communication number s : 2530/2015 Author: F. and G. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 119 Country Denmark Submission date 08 Jan 2015 Date of decision 16 Mar 2017 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/119/D/2530/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2288/en-US
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament, judges and prosecutors EVALUATION REPORT SERBIA
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament judges and prosecutors EVALUATION REPORT SERBIA SRB 2015 06 19 2015 07 02 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I. INTRODUCTION AND METHODOLOGY II. CONTEXT III. CORRUPTION GRECOGreco-Eval-IV-Rep-2014-8E-Final-Serbia-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=Greco-Eval-IV-Rep-2014-8E-Final-Serbia-PUBLIC
Fa'aaliga v. New Zealand
Fa aaliga v. New Zealand CCPR/C/85/D/1279/2004 Communication number s : 1279/2004 Author: Moleni Fa aaliga and Faatupu Fa aaliga Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 85 Country New Zealand Submission date 26 Feb 2004 Date of decision 28 JUTBCCPR/C/85/D/1279/2004https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1173/en-US
Farah v. Djibouti
Farah v. Djibouti CCPR/C/130/D/3593/2019 Communication number s : 3593/2019 Author: Daher Ahmed Farah Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 130 Country Djibouti Submission date 21 Nov 2017 Date of decision 04 Nov 2020 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/130/D/3593/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3274/en-US